期刊文献+
共找到2篇文章
< 1 >
每页显示 20 50 100
SpyGlass治疗难治性胆管结石有效性和安全性的Meta分析 被引量:3
1
作者 陈俊宏 闻丽加 刘凯 《中国内镜杂志》 2021年第11期6-16,共11页
目的评价SpyGlass治疗难治性胆管结石(DBDS)的有效性和安全性,并比较第一代与第二代SpyGlass、液电碎石与激光碎石治疗DBDS的疗效差异。方法检索多个中英文数据库建库至2021年2月的研究。通过纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表(NOS)和JADAD量表评估... 目的评价SpyGlass治疗难治性胆管结石(DBDS)的有效性和安全性,并比较第一代与第二代SpyGlass、液电碎石与激光碎石治疗DBDS的疗效差异。方法检索多个中英文数据库建库至2021年2月的研究。通过纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表(NOS)和JADAD量表评估不同类型研究的方法学质量,并使用随机效应模型合并效应量。重要结局包括结石完全清除率、结石单次清除率、取石次数和不良事件发生率。结果最终37项研究符合纳入标准,包含3728例患者。结石完全清除率为0.947(95%CI:0.920~0.970),结石单次清除率为0.747(95%CI:0.682~0.807),取石次数为1.10次(95%CI:1.080~1.120),不良事件发生率为0.065(95%CI:0.046~0.087);二代SpyGlass在结石完全清除率、结石单次清除率、取石次数上优于一代SpyGlass(97.3%和92.2%、80.3%和67.8%、1.03和1.27次);激光碎石在结石完全清除率、结石单次清除率、取石次数、不良事件发生率上优于液电碎石(97.8%和91.0%、80.4%和70.1%、1.06和1.19次、6.5%和7.8%)。结论常规取石方法失败时,SpyGlass是治疗DBDS的一种安全有效的方法,二代SpyGlass结合激光碎石可能会得到更好的疗效。 展开更多
关键词 META分析 SpyGlass 胆道镜 胆总管结石 碎石术
下载PDF
Utility of multiple endoscopic techniques in differential diagnosis of gallbladder adenomyomatosis from gallbladder malignancy with bile duct invasion: A case report 被引量:1
2
作者 li-jia wen Jun-Hong Chen +1 位作者 Yong-Jin Chen Kai Liu 《World Journal of Clinical Cases》 SCIE 2020年第2期464-470,共7页
BACKGROUND Gallbladder adenomyomatosis(GAM) is a benign lesion, characterized by thickening of the gallbladder wall and a focal mass, which overlap with the features of gallbladder malignancy. Consequently, differenti... BACKGROUND Gallbladder adenomyomatosis(GAM) is a benign lesion, characterized by thickening of the gallbladder wall and a focal mass, which overlap with the features of gallbladder malignancy. Consequently, differential diagnosis of GAM from gallbladder cancer is difficult and approximately 20% of suspected malignant biliary strictures are postoperatively confirmed as benign lesions.Herein, we report a case in which a preoperative diagnosis of GAM was made by a combination of endoscopic and imaging techniques.CASE SUMMARY A 40-year-old man was referred to our hospital chiefly for a fever and right upper abdominal pain with dark urine. Enhanced computed tomography showed thickening of the gallbladder wall and a mass in the gallbladder neck with involvement of the hepatic bile ducts, which was suspected to be malignant.Gallbladder malignancy with bile duct invasion was ruled out by subsequent endoscopic examinations, including endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, intraductal ultrasound, and Spy Glass. Endoscopic examinations showed a homogeneous hyperechoic lesion with smooth margins of benign bile duct stricture suggestive of inflammatory stenosis of the bile duct.The patient underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy. GAM was postoperatively diagnosed and confirmed based on the histopathology results, which are consistent with the preoperative diagnosis. Notably, no malignant event occurred in the patient during a 12-mo follow-up period.CONCLUSION A combination of endoscopic techniques may help in the differential diagnosis of GAM from gallbladder cancer. 展开更多
关键词 Gallbladder adenomyomatosis Differential diagnosis Endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatography Intraductal ultrasound SpyGlass Case report
下载PDF
上一页 1 下一页 到第
使用帮助 返回顶部