Parpose:The study aims to compare the efficacy and safety of a new minimally invasive osteosynthesis technique with those of conventional open surgery for transverse patellar fractures.Methods:It was a retrospective s...Parpose:The study aims to compare the efficacy and safety of a new minimally invasive osteosynthesis technique with those of conventional open surgery for transverse patellar fractures.Methods:It was a retrospective study.Adult patients with closed transverse patellar fracture were included,and with open comminuted patellar fracture were excluded.These patients were divided into minimally invasive osteosynthesis technique(MIOT)group and open reduction and internal fixation(ORIF)group.Surgical time,frequency of intraoperative fluoroscopy,visual analogue scale score,flexion,extension,Lysholm knee score,infection,malreduction,implant migration and implant irritation in two groups were recorded and compared.Statistical analysis was performed by the SPsS software package(version 19).A p<0.05 indicated statistical significance.Results:A total of 55 patients with transverse patellar fractures enrolled in this study,the minimally invasive technique was performed in 27 cases,and open reduction was performed in 28 cases.The surgical time in the ORIF group was shorter than that in the MIOT group(p=0.033).The visual analogue scale scores in the MIOT group were significantly lower than those in the ORIF group only in the first month after surgery(p=0.015).Flexion was restored faster in the MIOT group than that in the ORIF group at one month(p=0.001)and three months(p=0.015).Extension was recovered faster in the MIOT group than that in the ORIF group at one month(p=0.031)and three months(p=0.023).The recorded Lysholm knee scores in the MIOT group were always greater than those in the ORIF group.Complications,such as infection,malreduction,implant migration,and implant irritation,occurred more frequently in the ORIF group.Conclusion:Compared with the ORIF group,the MIOT group reduced postoperative pain and had less complications and better exercise rehabilitation.Although it requires a long operation time,MIOT may be a wise choice for transverse patellar fractures.展开更多
基金Projects(51904354,51634010)supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of ChinaProject(51825403)supported by the National Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars,ChinaProjects(2018YFC1903301,2018YFC1900301)supported by the National Key R&D Program of China。
基金supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China for Distinguished Young Scholars (No. 51825403)the National Key R&D Program of China (Nos. 2018YFC1903301, 2018YFC1900301)the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 51634010, 51904354)。
基金funded by Basic Public Welfare Plan of Zhejiang Province(LGF20H060008)Ningbo Science and technology Service Project(2020F029).
文摘Parpose:The study aims to compare the efficacy and safety of a new minimally invasive osteosynthesis technique with those of conventional open surgery for transverse patellar fractures.Methods:It was a retrospective study.Adult patients with closed transverse patellar fracture were included,and with open comminuted patellar fracture were excluded.These patients were divided into minimally invasive osteosynthesis technique(MIOT)group and open reduction and internal fixation(ORIF)group.Surgical time,frequency of intraoperative fluoroscopy,visual analogue scale score,flexion,extension,Lysholm knee score,infection,malreduction,implant migration and implant irritation in two groups were recorded and compared.Statistical analysis was performed by the SPsS software package(version 19).A p<0.05 indicated statistical significance.Results:A total of 55 patients with transverse patellar fractures enrolled in this study,the minimally invasive technique was performed in 27 cases,and open reduction was performed in 28 cases.The surgical time in the ORIF group was shorter than that in the MIOT group(p=0.033).The visual analogue scale scores in the MIOT group were significantly lower than those in the ORIF group only in the first month after surgery(p=0.015).Flexion was restored faster in the MIOT group than that in the ORIF group at one month(p=0.001)and three months(p=0.015).Extension was recovered faster in the MIOT group than that in the ORIF group at one month(p=0.031)and three months(p=0.023).The recorded Lysholm knee scores in the MIOT group were always greater than those in the ORIF group.Complications,such as infection,malreduction,implant migration,and implant irritation,occurred more frequently in the ORIF group.Conclusion:Compared with the ORIF group,the MIOT group reduced postoperative pain and had less complications and better exercise rehabilitation.Although it requires a long operation time,MIOT may be a wise choice for transverse patellar fractures.
