An exclusive fine-needle biopsy approach to sampling solid lesions under EUS guidance:a prospective cohort study

Background Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy(EUS-FNB)is increasingly utilized to enhance the cytological yield of sampling solid lesions,but its superiority over existing fine-needle aspiration(FNA)platforms has not been clearly demonstrated.The aim of our study was to compare the diagnostic accuracy and procedural outcomes of FNB using a new Franseen-tip needle to that of a traditional FNA in sampling solid lesions under EUS guidance.Methods Consecutive patients with solid lesions referred for EUS-FNB sampling were included.Procedure-related outcomes were collected prospectively including patient demographics,number of passes performed,diagnostic sample adequacy,adverse events,and recovery time.The Acquire needle was used to sample all lesions in the study group.Consecutive EUSFNA procedures performed to sample solid lesions using the Expect needle were utilized as controls.Results There were 180 patients undergoing EUS-FNB compared to 183 patients undergoing EUS-FNA procedures for solidlesion sampling.The procedure time was significantly shorter in patients who underwent FNB compared to FNA(mean:37.4 vs 44.9 minutes,P<0.001).Significantly fewer passes were performed in the FNB cohort compared to the FNA group(mean:2.9 vs 3.8,P<0.001).The cytologic diagnostic yield was significantly higher in the FNB group compared to the FNA group(98.3%vs 90.2%,P=0.003).No significant difference in the incidence of adverse events was observed between the FNB and FNA groups(1.1%vs 0.5%,P=0.564).Conclusions An FNB-exclusive approach to sampling solid lesions under EUS guidance is safe and feasible,and may result in fewer overall passes,shorter procedure time,and improved diagnostic adequacy.FNB may replace FNA as the primary sampling modality of choice in all solid lesions.