基于交替方向乘子法(alternating direction method of multipliers,ADMM)的线性规划(liner programming,LP)译码模型因其不会出现错误平台和具有最大似然认证的优点,广受译码研究者的关注。目前大多数ADMM算法采用的是泛洪调度策略(flo...基于交替方向乘子法(alternating direction method of multipliers,ADMM)的线性规划(liner programming,LP)译码模型因其不会出现错误平台和具有最大似然认证的优点,广受译码研究者的关注。目前大多数ADMM算法采用的是泛洪调度策略(flooding,FL),该算法存在译码收敛速度过慢的问题。基于水平分层调度的交替方向乘子法的低密度奇偶校验(low density parity check,LDPC)码译码算法能够加速译码收敛速度,然而目前水平分层调度算法中的投影算法采用的为精确投影算法,复杂度较高。针对该问题,将近似投影算法和水平分层调度算法结合,提出基于近似投影的ADMM水平分层调度译码算法以提高译码的性能。仿真实验表明,相比其他算法,本文提出的算法的译码性能可提升0.1~0.3 dB,迭代次数可降低19%~40%,平均译码时间可减少21%~65%。展开更多
Objective: To observe the clinical efficacy of electroacupuncture (EA) plus Tanbo-plucking the trigger points for scapulohumeral periarthritis (SP). Methods:A total of 80 patients with SP were randomized into an obser...Objective: To observe the clinical efficacy of electroacupuncture (EA) plus Tanbo-plucking the trigger points for scapulohumeral periarthritis (SP). Methods:A total of 80 patients with SP were randomized into an observation group and an EA group by the random number table, with 40 cases in each group. The EA group was treated with EA therapy, and the observation group was treated with EA therapy plus Tanbo-plucking the trigger points. After treatment, the visual analog scale (VAS) and Melle scores of the two groups were compared to evaluate the improvement of shoulder pain and functional activity, and meanwhile the clinical efficacy was observed. Results: After treatment, the total effective rate of the observation group was 95.0% and the cure and markedly effective rate was 72.5%. The total effective rate of the EA group was 87.5% and the cure and markedly effective rate was 42.5%. There was no significant difference in the total effective rate between the two groups (P>0.05). The cure and markedly effective rate of the observation group was higher than that of the EA group, and the difference between the two groups was statistically significant (P<0.05). After treatment, the intra-group differences in VAS and Melle scores of both groups were statistically significant (bothP<0.001). The inter-group differences in the changes of the VAS and Melle scores after treatment were statistically significant (bothP<0.001). Conclusion: EA plus Tanbo-plucking the trigger points has a better curative effect than EA therapy alone in the treatment of SP.展开更多
文摘基于交替方向乘子法(alternating direction method of multipliers,ADMM)的线性规划(liner programming,LP)译码模型因其不会出现错误平台和具有最大似然认证的优点,广受译码研究者的关注。目前大多数ADMM算法采用的是泛洪调度策略(flooding,FL),该算法存在译码收敛速度过慢的问题。基于水平分层调度的交替方向乘子法的低密度奇偶校验(low density parity check,LDPC)码译码算法能够加速译码收敛速度,然而目前水平分层调度算法中的投影算法采用的为精确投影算法,复杂度较高。针对该问题,将近似投影算法和水平分层调度算法结合,提出基于近似投影的ADMM水平分层调度译码算法以提高译码的性能。仿真实验表明,相比其他算法,本文提出的算法的译码性能可提升0.1~0.3 dB,迭代次数可降低19%~40%,平均译码时间可减少21%~65%。
文摘Objective: To observe the clinical efficacy of electroacupuncture (EA) plus Tanbo-plucking the trigger points for scapulohumeral periarthritis (SP). Methods:A total of 80 patients with SP were randomized into an observation group and an EA group by the random number table, with 40 cases in each group. The EA group was treated with EA therapy, and the observation group was treated with EA therapy plus Tanbo-plucking the trigger points. After treatment, the visual analog scale (VAS) and Melle scores of the two groups were compared to evaluate the improvement of shoulder pain and functional activity, and meanwhile the clinical efficacy was observed. Results: After treatment, the total effective rate of the observation group was 95.0% and the cure and markedly effective rate was 72.5%. The total effective rate of the EA group was 87.5% and the cure and markedly effective rate was 42.5%. There was no significant difference in the total effective rate between the two groups (P>0.05). The cure and markedly effective rate of the observation group was higher than that of the EA group, and the difference between the two groups was statistically significant (P<0.05). After treatment, the intra-group differences in VAS and Melle scores of both groups were statistically significant (bothP<0.001). The inter-group differences in the changes of the VAS and Melle scores after treatment were statistically significant (bothP<0.001). Conclusion: EA plus Tanbo-plucking the trigger points has a better curative effect than EA therapy alone in the treatment of SP.