AIM To compare the amount of contrast used during percutaneous coronary intervention(PCI) via trans-radial access(TRA) vs trans-femoral access(TFA).METHODS Scientific databases and websites were searched for:randomize...AIM To compare the amount of contrast used during percutaneous coronary intervention(PCI) via trans-radial access(TRA) vs trans-femoral access(TFA).METHODS Scientific databases and websites were searched for:randomizedcontrolledtrials(RCTs). Data were extracted by two independent reviewers and was summarized as the weighted mean difference(WMD) of contrast used with a 95%CI using a random-effects model. RESULTS The meta-analysis included 13 RCTs with a total of 3165 patients. There was no difference between the two strategies in the amount of contrast used(WMD =-0.65 mL,95%CI:-10.94-9.46 mL; P = 0.901). CONCLUSION This meta-analysis shows that in patients undergoing PCI,the amount of contrast volume used was not different between TRA and TFA.展开更多
文摘AIM To compare the amount of contrast used during percutaneous coronary intervention(PCI) via trans-radial access(TRA) vs trans-femoral access(TFA).METHODS Scientific databases and websites were searched for:randomizedcontrolledtrials(RCTs). Data were extracted by two independent reviewers and was summarized as the weighted mean difference(WMD) of contrast used with a 95%CI using a random-effects model. RESULTS The meta-analysis included 13 RCTs with a total of 3165 patients. There was no difference between the two strategies in the amount of contrast used(WMD =-0.65 mL,95%CI:-10.94-9.46 mL; P = 0.901). CONCLUSION This meta-analysis shows that in patients undergoing PCI,the amount of contrast volume used was not different between TRA and TFA.
