This paper deals with the monitoring cyclo-addition of CO2 to methyl methacrylate (MMA)-glycidyl methacrylate (GMA) copolymers using spectral (IH-NMR and FTIR) and chemical (elemental analysis and titration) m...This paper deals with the monitoring cyclo-addition of CO2 to methyl methacrylate (MMA)-glycidyl methacrylate (GMA) copolymers using spectral (IH-NMR and FTIR) and chemical (elemental analysis and titration) methods. Thus, poly(MMA-co-GMA), was first prepared via solution polymerization. The copolymer was then treated with CO2 gas flow in the presence of cetyltrimethyl ammoniumbromide as a catalyst. In terms of the carbonation reaction time, the terpolymer poly(MMA-eo-GMA-co-2-oxo-l,3-dioxolane-4-yl-methyl methacrylate) was prepared in various yield of CO2 fixation (〉 90%). The peak intensity changes in the 1H-NMR and FTIR spectra provided excellent demonstrative techniques to monitor the carbonation reaction progression. In a comparative analytical viewpoint, the NMR and elemental analysis were recognized to be the most accurate ways to follow the cyclo-addition reaction progression. However, titration was recognized to be the most preferred method, because it is a very inexpensive, facile and available method with a reasonable cost- accuracy balance.展开更多
文摘This paper deals with the monitoring cyclo-addition of CO2 to methyl methacrylate (MMA)-glycidyl methacrylate (GMA) copolymers using spectral (IH-NMR and FTIR) and chemical (elemental analysis and titration) methods. Thus, poly(MMA-co-GMA), was first prepared via solution polymerization. The copolymer was then treated with CO2 gas flow in the presence of cetyltrimethyl ammoniumbromide as a catalyst. In terms of the carbonation reaction time, the terpolymer poly(MMA-eo-GMA-co-2-oxo-l,3-dioxolane-4-yl-methyl methacrylate) was prepared in various yield of CO2 fixation (〉 90%). The peak intensity changes in the 1H-NMR and FTIR spectra provided excellent demonstrative techniques to monitor the carbonation reaction progression. In a comparative analytical viewpoint, the NMR and elemental analysis were recognized to be the most accurate ways to follow the cyclo-addition reaction progression. However, titration was recognized to be the most preferred method, because it is a very inexpensive, facile and available method with a reasonable cost- accuracy balance.