Flow field of weld pool during deep penetration electron beam welding of TA 15 titanium alloy was numerically and experimentally studied using a hybrid heat source of Gaussian surface heat source and rotational parabo...Flow field of weld pool during deep penetration electron beam welding of TA 15 titanium alloy was numerically and experimentally studied using a hybrid heat source of Gaussian surface heat source and rotational paraboloidal body heat source. And the formation mechanism of the weld pool flow field was analyzed. The results showed that the movement of the liquid metal in the top weld pool was the fiercest and weakened gradually in the middle and bottom of the weld pool. The maximum flow velocity of the liquid metal was about 0. 295 m/s in the top surface of weld pool. The primary driving forces of the movement of liquid metal in the weld pool were the recoil pressure of metal vapor and the surface tension.展开更多
目的对机器人辅助胸腔镜下肺癌根治术(robot-assisted thoracic surgery,RATS)和胸腔镜下肺癌根治术(video-assisted thoracic surgery,VATS)治疗早期肺癌患者的疗效进行客观评价。方法回顾性分析2016年1月至2017年12月甘肃省人民医院8...目的对机器人辅助胸腔镜下肺癌根治术(robot-assisted thoracic surgery,RATS)和胸腔镜下肺癌根治术(video-assisted thoracic surgery,VATS)治疗早期肺癌患者的疗效进行客观评价。方法回顾性分析2016年1月至2017年12月甘肃省人民医院80例行肺癌根治术患者的临床数据资料,其中男51例、女29例。VATS组43例,RATS组37例,用Stata v14.0统计软件进行数据处理。结果 RATS组手术时间明显较VATS组长(172.21 min vs. 162.20 min,P=0.018)。RATS组手术费用比VATS组高(74 076.69元vs. 54 814.73元,P<0.001)。RATS组术后住院时间比VATS组短(8.27 d vs. 10.76 d,P=0.001)。两组术中中转开胸例数(3例vs. 0例,P=0.144)、术中失血量(61.29 ml vs. 90.63 ml,P=0.213)、淋巴结清扫总数量(17.38 vs. 12.63,P=0.095),术后引流量(1 406.76 ml vs. 1 514.60 ml,P=0.617)以及术后引流管留置时间(7.92 d vs. 7.20 d,P=0.440)差异无统计学意义。结论行肺癌根治手术的早期肺癌患者中,机器人组术后住院时间明显比胸腔镜组短,手术时间较胸腔镜组长,其余近期手术指标与胸腔镜类似,机器人手术没有明显优势;但机器人在淋巴结清扫难度较大、周围组织粘连严重、解剖关系异常复杂的患者的治疗上有较大的优势。展开更多
文摘Flow field of weld pool during deep penetration electron beam welding of TA 15 titanium alloy was numerically and experimentally studied using a hybrid heat source of Gaussian surface heat source and rotational paraboloidal body heat source. And the formation mechanism of the weld pool flow field was analyzed. The results showed that the movement of the liquid metal in the top weld pool was the fiercest and weakened gradually in the middle and bottom of the weld pool. The maximum flow velocity of the liquid metal was about 0. 295 m/s in the top surface of weld pool. The primary driving forces of the movement of liquid metal in the weld pool were the recoil pressure of metal vapor and the surface tension.
文摘目的对机器人辅助胸腔镜下肺癌根治术(robot-assisted thoracic surgery,RATS)和胸腔镜下肺癌根治术(video-assisted thoracic surgery,VATS)治疗早期肺癌患者的疗效进行客观评价。方法回顾性分析2016年1月至2017年12月甘肃省人民医院80例行肺癌根治术患者的临床数据资料,其中男51例、女29例。VATS组43例,RATS组37例,用Stata v14.0统计软件进行数据处理。结果 RATS组手术时间明显较VATS组长(172.21 min vs. 162.20 min,P=0.018)。RATS组手术费用比VATS组高(74 076.69元vs. 54 814.73元,P<0.001)。RATS组术后住院时间比VATS组短(8.27 d vs. 10.76 d,P=0.001)。两组术中中转开胸例数(3例vs. 0例,P=0.144)、术中失血量(61.29 ml vs. 90.63 ml,P=0.213)、淋巴结清扫总数量(17.38 vs. 12.63,P=0.095),术后引流量(1 406.76 ml vs. 1 514.60 ml,P=0.617)以及术后引流管留置时间(7.92 d vs. 7.20 d,P=0.440)差异无统计学意义。结论行肺癌根治手术的早期肺癌患者中,机器人组术后住院时间明显比胸腔镜组短,手术时间较胸腔镜组长,其余近期手术指标与胸腔镜类似,机器人手术没有明显优势;但机器人在淋巴结清扫难度较大、周围组织粘连严重、解剖关系异常复杂的患者的治疗上有较大的优势。