BACKGROUND Hemodynamic instability and shock are associated with untoward outcomes in gastrointestinal bleeding.However,there are no studies in the existing literature on the proportion of patients who developed these...BACKGROUND Hemodynamic instability and shock are associated with untoward outcomes in gastrointestinal bleeding.However,there are no studies in the existing literature on the proportion of patients who developed these outcomes after gastrointestinal bleeding.AIM To determine the pooled event rates in the available literature and specify them based on the bleeding source.METHODS The protocol was registered on PROSPERO in advance(CRD42021283258).A systematic search was performed in three databases(PubMed,EMBASE,and CENTRAL)on 14^(th) October 2021.Pooled proportions with 95%CI were calculated with a random-effects model.A subgroup analysis was carried out based on the time of assessment(on admission or during hospital stay).Heterogeneity was assessed by Higgins and Thompson’s I^(2) statistics.The Joanna Briggs Institute Prevalence Critical Appraisal Tool was used for the risk of bias assessment.The Reference Citation Analysis(https://www.referencecitationanalysis.com/)tool was applied to obtain the latest highlight articles.RESULTS We identified 11589 records,of which 220 studies were eligible for data extraction.The overall proportion of shock and hemodynamic instability in general gastrointestinal bleeding patients was 0.25(95%CI:0.17-0.36,I^(2)=100%).In non-variceal bleeding,the proportion was 0.22(95%CI:0.14-0.31,I^(2)=100%),whereas it was 0.25(95%CI:0.19-0.32,I^(2)=100%)in variceal bleeding.The proportion of patients with colonic diverticular bleeding who developed shock or hemodynamic instability was 0.12(95%CI:0.06-0.22,I^(2)=90%).The risk of bias was low,and heterogeneity was high in all analyses.CONCLUSION One in five,one in four,and one in eight patients develops shock or hemodynamic instability on admission or during hospitalization in the case of non-variceal,variceal,and colonic diverticular bleeding,respectively.展开更多
基金The Ministry of Innovation and Technology of Hungary from the National Research,Development,and Innovation Fund(ITM-NRDIF),No.TKP2021-EGA-23.
文摘BACKGROUND Hemodynamic instability and shock are associated with untoward outcomes in gastrointestinal bleeding.However,there are no studies in the existing literature on the proportion of patients who developed these outcomes after gastrointestinal bleeding.AIM To determine the pooled event rates in the available literature and specify them based on the bleeding source.METHODS The protocol was registered on PROSPERO in advance(CRD42021283258).A systematic search was performed in three databases(PubMed,EMBASE,and CENTRAL)on 14^(th) October 2021.Pooled proportions with 95%CI were calculated with a random-effects model.A subgroup analysis was carried out based on the time of assessment(on admission or during hospital stay).Heterogeneity was assessed by Higgins and Thompson’s I^(2) statistics.The Joanna Briggs Institute Prevalence Critical Appraisal Tool was used for the risk of bias assessment.The Reference Citation Analysis(https://www.referencecitationanalysis.com/)tool was applied to obtain the latest highlight articles.RESULTS We identified 11589 records,of which 220 studies were eligible for data extraction.The overall proportion of shock and hemodynamic instability in general gastrointestinal bleeding patients was 0.25(95%CI:0.17-0.36,I^(2)=100%).In non-variceal bleeding,the proportion was 0.22(95%CI:0.14-0.31,I^(2)=100%),whereas it was 0.25(95%CI:0.19-0.32,I^(2)=100%)in variceal bleeding.The proportion of patients with colonic diverticular bleeding who developed shock or hemodynamic instability was 0.12(95%CI:0.06-0.22,I^(2)=90%).The risk of bias was low,and heterogeneity was high in all analyses.CONCLUSION One in five,one in four,and one in eight patients develops shock or hemodynamic instability on admission or during hospitalization in the case of non-variceal,variceal,and colonic diverticular bleeding,respectively.
