Comparison of unenhanced magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasound in detecting very small hepatocellular carcinoma

BACKGROUND In hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC),detection and treatment prior to growth beyond 2 cm are important as a larger tumor size is more frequently associated with microvascular invasion and/or satellites.In the surveillance of very small HCC nodules(≤2 cm in maximum diameter,Barcelona clinical stage 0),we demonstrated that the tumor markers alpha-fetoprotein and PIVKA-Ⅱare not so useful.Therefore,we must survey with imaging modalities.The superiority of magnetic resonance imaging(MRI)over ultrasound(US)to detect HCC was confirmed in many studies.Although enhanced MRI is now performed to accurately diagnose HCC,in conventional clinical practice for HCC surveillance in liver diseases,unenhanced MRI is widely performed throughout the world.While,MRI has made marked improvements in recent years.AIM To make a comparison of unenhanced MRI and US in detecting very small HCC that was examined in the last ten years in patients in whom MRI and US examinations were performed nearly simultaneously.METHODS In 394 patients with very small HCC nodules,those who underwent MRI and US at nearly the same time(on the same day whenever possible or at least within 14 days of one another)at the first diagnosis of HCC were selected.The detection rate of HCC with unenhanced MRI was investigated and compared with that of unenhanced US.RESULTS The sensitivity of unenhanced MRI for detecting very small HCC was 95.1%(97/102,95%confidence interval:90.9-99.3)and that of unenhanced US was 69.6%(71/102,95%confidence interval:60.7-78.5).The sensitivity of unenhanced MRI for detecting very small HCC was significantly higher than that of unenhanced US(P<0.001).Regarding the location of HCC in the liver in patients in whom detection by US was unsuccessful,S7-8 was identified in 51.7%.CONCLUSION Currently,unenhanced MRI is a very useful tool for the surveillance of very small HCC in conventional clinical follow-up practice.

Real impact of tumor marker AFP and PIVKA-II in detecting very small hepatocellular carcinoma(≤2 cm,Barcelona stage 0)-assessment with large number of cases

BACKGROUND In hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC),detection and treatment prior to growth beyond 2 cm are relevant as a larger tumor size is more frequently associated with microvascular invasion and/or satellites.AIM To examine the impact of the tumor marker alpha-fetoprotein(AFP)or PIVKA-II in detecting very small HCC nodules(≤2 cm in maximum diameter,Barcelona stage 0)in the large number of very small HCC.The difference in the behavior of these tumor markers in HCC development was also examined.METHODS A total of 933 patients with single-nodule HCC were examined.They were subdivided into 394 patients with HCC nodules≤2 cm in maximum diameter and 539 patients whose nodules were>2 cm.The rates of patients whose AFP and PIVKA-II showed normal values were examined.RESULTS The positive ratio of the marker PIVKA-II was significantly different(P<0.0001)between patients with nodules≤2 cm in diameter and those with nodules>2 cm,but there was no significant difference in AFP(P=0.4254).In the patients whose tumor was≤2 cm,50.5%showed normal levels in AFP and 68.8%showed normal levels in PIVKA-II.In 36.4%of those patients,both AFP and PIVKA-II showed normal levels.The PIVKA-II-positive ratio was markedly increased with an increase in the tumor size.In contrast,the positivity in AFP was increased gradually and slowly.CONCLUSION In the surveillance of very small HCC nodules(≤2 cm in diameter,Barcelona clinical stage 0)the tumor markers AFP and PIVKA-II are not so useful.

Effectiveness of entecavir in preventing hepatocellular carcinoma development is genotype-dependent in hepatitis B virus-associated liver cirrhosis

BACKGROUND The oral nucleos(t)ide analogue,entecavir(ETV)was demonstrated to reduce the rate of hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC)in patients with hepatitis B virus(HBV)-associated liver cirrhosis.However,the reduction of HCC differs in various regions of the world.AIM To investigate the reduction of HCC development due to ETV therapy by metaanalysis.METHODS We surveyed the differences in HCC development following ETV treatment based on published articles using PubMed(2004-2019).RESULTS The regions with the most marked reduction in HCC development due to ETV therapy were Spain(1.0%/year)and Canada(Southern part,1.3%/year),and the most ineffective areas were South Korea(3.6%-3.8%/year),China(3.3%/year),Taiwan(2.4%-3.1%/year),and Hong Kong(2.8%/year).Following ETV administration,the incidence of HCC in genotype D regions(1.89%±0.28%/year,mean±SE)was significantly lower than that in genotype C regions(2.91%±0.24%/year,P<0.01).With regard to the initial HBV-DNA level,in genotype C patients(average:5.61 Log10IU/mL)this was almost the same as that in genotype D patients(average:5.46 Log10IU/mL).Moreover,there was no association between the prevalence ratio of HBV and the incidence of HCC on ETV treatment.CONCLUSION The effectiveness of ETV in preventing HCC development in HBV-associated liver cirrhosis is genotype-dependent.

Lenvatinib for large hepatocellular carcinomas with portal trunk invasion:Two case reports

BACKGROUND In a phase III trial of lenvatinib as first-line treatment for advanced unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma(uHCC),the drug proved non-inferior to sorafenib in terms of the overall survival,but offered better progression-free survival.However,the effects of lenvatinib in uHCC patients with a tumor thrombus in the main portal vein and/or a high tumor burden(tumor occupancy more than 50%of the total liver volume),remain unclear,because these were set as exclusion criteria in the aforementioned trial.CASE SUMMARY A 53-year-old man(case 1)and 66-year-old woman(case 2)with uHCC presented to us with a tumor thrombus in both the main portal vein and inferior vena cava,a high tumor burden accompanied by a tumor diameter greater than>100 mm,and distant metastasis,with the residual liver function classified as grade 2A according to the modified Albumin–Bilirubin grading.We started both patients on lenvatinib.The therapeutic effect,as evaluated by the modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors,was rated as partial response in both case 1 and case 2(at 8 wk and 4 wk after the start of lenvatinib administration,respectively).The therapeutic effect was sustained for 6 mo in case 1 and 20 mo in case 2.Fever occurred as an adverse event in both case 1 and 2,and hyperthyroidism and thrombocytopenia in only case 2,neither of which,however,necessitated treatment discontinuation.CONCLUSION Even in hepatocellular carcinoma patients with poor prognostic factors,if the liver function is well-preserved,lenvatinib is effective and safe.