<strong>Introduction</strong><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><strong>: </strong></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Improving teenagers’ knowledg...<strong>Introduction</strong><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><strong>: </strong></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Improving teenagers’ knowledge </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">on</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> sexual and reproductive health (SRH) is important to prevent unintended pregnancies. We aimed to assess comprehensive sexuality education (CSE)</span><b> </b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">programs and knowledge, attitudes </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">and</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> practices of adolescents and teachers towards contraception.</span> <span style="font-family:Verdana;"><b>Methods</b></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><b>: </b></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Based on the reasoned action theory and CSE guidelines, a qualitative study was conducted with seven teachers and 62 adolescents aged 15</span> <span style="font-family:Verdana;">-</span> <span style="font-family:Verdana;">19. The data were collected through six focus groups (FG) of adolescents and seven semi-structured interviews of teachers. The program of the family life education course (FLEC) was assessed. The Atlas Ti software helped to analyze the data, using a deductive approach.</span> <span style="font-family:Verdana;"><b>Results</b></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><b>: </b></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">The periodic abstinence, male condoms </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">and</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> pills were the most known contraceptive methods. Adolescents and teachers were reluctant to use artificial contraceptive methods, apart from the male condom which they used irregularly. Girls especially prefer</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">red</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> natural contraceptive methods, fearing side effects, such as the risk of infertility. Almost all adolescents wanted to be informed on SRH and family planning in school. However, they estimated </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">that </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">the content of the FLEC </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">was </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">insufficient</span> <span style="font-family:Verdana;">and criticize</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">d</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> the teachers</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">’</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> lack of openness. Their main sources of information were peers, siblings </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">and</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> the internet. Mothers were an important source of information for girls, unlike fathers considered to be indifferent or even frightening.</span> <span style="font-family:Verdana;"><b>Conclusion</b></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><b>: </b></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Adolescents’ and teachers’ knowledge </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">are</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> weak;and their attitude</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">s</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> unfavorable towards contraception. Misconceptions about contraception lead to the use of ineffective practices to prevent unwanted pregnancies. To improve knowledge, a teacher training program should be developed and the content of the FLEC improved</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">, </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">formalized and regulated.</span>展开更多
<strong>Background: </strong>Poor regulation is a barrier to adolescents’ accessing family planning (FP) services. We aimed to assess policies, laws, and regulations according to the contraceptive needs o...<strong>Background: </strong>Poor regulation is a barrier to adolescents’ accessing family planning (FP) services. We aimed to assess policies, laws, and regulations according to the contraceptive needs of adolescents in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC). <strong>Methods:</strong> A mixed method study was conducted in 74 structures, including 13 administrative structures and 61 facilities offering FP. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews and document review. Using a health policy analysis framework, we analyzed the types of policies;their availability at the delivery points;the actors and the context of the policy formulation process. The content of policies was analyzed on the basis of WHO recommendations to ensure respect for human rights in the provision of contraceptive information and services. <strong>Results: </strong>Of the policies targeting the sexual and reproductive health (SRH), 18 were mainly focused on the FP of which 5 were the standards and directives;5 implementing documents;3 guidelines;3 laws and 2 policies. Twelve documents were classified “important” for the FP extension. However, a few targeted adolescents and were translated into operational instructions for providers. Of 9 WHO recommendations, one was fully and two partially integrated into FP policies. Adolescents and FP providers were less involved in the policy formulation process. <strong>Conclusion:</strong> The FP regulation remains problematic in the DRC. FP policies are unsuitable to adolescents’ expectation;they do not guarantee a secure and unrestricted access to FP services. The ministry of health should put in place evidence-based regulations to improve access to SRH services by adolescents.展开更多
文摘<strong>Introduction</strong><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><strong>: </strong></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Improving teenagers’ knowledge </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">on</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> sexual and reproductive health (SRH) is important to prevent unintended pregnancies. We aimed to assess comprehensive sexuality education (CSE)</span><b> </b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">programs and knowledge, attitudes </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">and</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> practices of adolescents and teachers towards contraception.</span> <span style="font-family:Verdana;"><b>Methods</b></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><b>: </b></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Based on the reasoned action theory and CSE guidelines, a qualitative study was conducted with seven teachers and 62 adolescents aged 15</span> <span style="font-family:Verdana;">-</span> <span style="font-family:Verdana;">19. The data were collected through six focus groups (FG) of adolescents and seven semi-structured interviews of teachers. The program of the family life education course (FLEC) was assessed. The Atlas Ti software helped to analyze the data, using a deductive approach.</span> <span style="font-family:Verdana;"><b>Results</b></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><b>: </b></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">The periodic abstinence, male condoms </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">and</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> pills were the most known contraceptive methods. Adolescents and teachers were reluctant to use artificial contraceptive methods, apart from the male condom which they used irregularly. Girls especially prefer</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">red</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> natural contraceptive methods, fearing side effects, such as the risk of infertility. Almost all adolescents wanted to be informed on SRH and family planning in school. However, they estimated </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">that </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">the content of the FLEC </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">was </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">insufficient</span> <span style="font-family:Verdana;">and criticize</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">d</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> the teachers</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">’</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> lack of openness. Their main sources of information were peers, siblings </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">and</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> the internet. Mothers were an important source of information for girls, unlike fathers considered to be indifferent or even frightening.</span> <span style="font-family:Verdana;"><b>Conclusion</b></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><b>: </b></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Adolescents’ and teachers’ knowledge </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">are</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> weak;and their attitude</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">s</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> unfavorable towards contraception. Misconceptions about contraception lead to the use of ineffective practices to prevent unwanted pregnancies. To improve knowledge, a teacher training program should be developed and the content of the FLEC improved</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">, </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">formalized and regulated.</span>
文摘<strong>Background: </strong>Poor regulation is a barrier to adolescents’ accessing family planning (FP) services. We aimed to assess policies, laws, and regulations according to the contraceptive needs of adolescents in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC). <strong>Methods:</strong> A mixed method study was conducted in 74 structures, including 13 administrative structures and 61 facilities offering FP. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews and document review. Using a health policy analysis framework, we analyzed the types of policies;their availability at the delivery points;the actors and the context of the policy formulation process. The content of policies was analyzed on the basis of WHO recommendations to ensure respect for human rights in the provision of contraceptive information and services. <strong>Results: </strong>Of the policies targeting the sexual and reproductive health (SRH), 18 were mainly focused on the FP of which 5 were the standards and directives;5 implementing documents;3 guidelines;3 laws and 2 policies. Twelve documents were classified “important” for the FP extension. However, a few targeted adolescents and were translated into operational instructions for providers. Of 9 WHO recommendations, one was fully and two partially integrated into FP policies. Adolescents and FP providers were less involved in the policy formulation process. <strong>Conclusion:</strong> The FP regulation remains problematic in the DRC. FP policies are unsuitable to adolescents’ expectation;they do not guarantee a secure and unrestricted access to FP services. The ministry of health should put in place evidence-based regulations to improve access to SRH services by adolescents.