Several decomposed body parts were received for examination by the Forensic Anthropology section of the Medico-legal Institute of João Pessoa,Paraíba,Brazil.The portions of the lower and upper limbs,ribs,ver...Several decomposed body parts were received for examination by the Forensic Anthropology section of the Medico-legal Institute of João Pessoa,Paraíba,Brazil.The portions of the lower and upper limbs,ribs,vertebrae,and a skull were thoroughly examined.The biological profile indicated a male individual with an estimated age range between 23 and 57 years and a mean age of 35.2 years(SD=9.4;phase IV,Suchey-Brooks).The skeleton showed injuries caused by sharp force and sharp-blunt force trauma that affected all body segments.Macroscopically,the lesions are mainly in the diaphyseal segments of the long bones,sacrum,pelvis,mandible,maxilla,scapulae,sternum,vertebrae,the distal epiphysis of the left fibula,and the distal epiphysis of the left tibia displayed characteristics compatible with injuries produced perimortem.It was not possible to determine the cause of death.DNAanalysis resulted in a positive identification.Because of common difficulties faced in forensic practice,it is often not possible for forensic anthropologists to go to the crime scene,X-ray or body scanners are frequently unavailable,and the victim’s medical and/or dental records are sometimes absent.These difficulties make identification ultimately depend on genetic analysis,which is more time-consuming than other identification methods.Despite this,bone fragment examination in dismemberment cases is a complex task.Forensic Anthropology can shed light on cases involving the identification of dismembered remains,which are challenging because of the number of traumatic injuries,as well as different injury patterns,on bones.展开更多
文摘Several decomposed body parts were received for examination by the Forensic Anthropology section of the Medico-legal Institute of João Pessoa,Paraíba,Brazil.The portions of the lower and upper limbs,ribs,vertebrae,and a skull were thoroughly examined.The biological profile indicated a male individual with an estimated age range between 23 and 57 years and a mean age of 35.2 years(SD=9.4;phase IV,Suchey-Brooks).The skeleton showed injuries caused by sharp force and sharp-blunt force trauma that affected all body segments.Macroscopically,the lesions are mainly in the diaphyseal segments of the long bones,sacrum,pelvis,mandible,maxilla,scapulae,sternum,vertebrae,the distal epiphysis of the left fibula,and the distal epiphysis of the left tibia displayed characteristics compatible with injuries produced perimortem.It was not possible to determine the cause of death.DNAanalysis resulted in a positive identification.Because of common difficulties faced in forensic practice,it is often not possible for forensic anthropologists to go to the crime scene,X-ray or body scanners are frequently unavailable,and the victim’s medical and/or dental records are sometimes absent.These difficulties make identification ultimately depend on genetic analysis,which is more time-consuming than other identification methods.Despite this,bone fragment examination in dismemberment cases is a complex task.Forensic Anthropology can shed light on cases involving the identification of dismembered remains,which are challenging because of the number of traumatic injuries,as well as different injury patterns,on bones.