Background: In patients with Parkinson’s disease (PD), real-time quaking-induced conversion (RT-QuIC) detection of pathological α-synuclein (α-syn) in olfactory mucosa (OM) is not as accurate as in other α-synucle...Background: In patients with Parkinson’s disease (PD), real-time quaking-induced conversion (RT-QuIC) detection of pathological α-synuclein (α-syn) in olfactory mucosa (OM) is not as accurate as in other α-synucleinopathies. It is unknown whether these variable results might be related to a different distribution of pathological α-syn in OM. Thus, we investigated whether nasal swab (NS) performed in areas with a different coverage by olfactory neuroepithelium, such as agger nasi (AN) and middle turbinate (MT), might affect the detection of pathological α-syn. Methods: NS was performed in 66 patients with PD and 29 non-PD between September 2018 and April 2021. In 43 patients, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) was also obtained and all samples were analyzed by RT-QuIC for α-syn. Results: In the first round, 72 OM samples were collected by NS, from AN (NSAN) or from MT (NSMT), and 35 resulted positive for α-syn RT-QuIC, including 27/32 (84%) from AN, 5/11 (45%) from MT, and 3/29 (10%) belonging to the non-PD patients. Furthermore, 23 additional PD patients underwent NS at both AN and MT, and RT-QuIC revealed α-syn positive in 18/23 (78%) NSAN samples and in 10/23 (44%) NSMT samples. Immunocytochemistry of NS prepara-tions showed a higher representation of olfactory neural cells in NSAN compared to NSMT. We also observed α-syn and phospho-α-syn deposits in NS from PD patients but not in controls. Finally, RT-QuIC was positive in 22/24 CSF samples from PD patients (92%) and in 1/19 non-PD. Conclusion: In PD patients, RT-QuIC sensitivity is significantly increased (from 45% to 84%) when NS is performed at AN, indicating that α-syn aggregates are preferentially detected in olfactory areas with higher concentration of olfactory neurons. Although RT-QuIC analysis of CSF showed a higher diagnostic accuracy compared to NS, due to the non-invasiveness, NS might be considered as an ancillary procedure for PD diagnosis.展开更多
Correction:Translational Neurodegeneration(2022)11:37 https://doi.org/10.1186/s40035-022-00311-3 In the original publication of this article[1],“AN”is miss-ing in the column heading“Patients underwent NS at the(n=...Correction:Translational Neurodegeneration(2022)11:37 https://doi.org/10.1186/s40035-022-00311-3 In the original publication of this article[1],“AN”is miss-ing in the column heading“Patients underwent NS at the(n=46)”in Table 1 due to a typesetting error.The correct column heading should be“Patients underwent NS at the AN(n=46)”.Moreover,the asterisk symbol*in“27(84)*”and“5(45)*”should be removed.In addition,the phrase“using FLOQBrushes(Copan Italia,Brescia,Italy)”needs be added in the first sentence under the header“OM sample collection”of the Methods section.展开更多
基金Fondazione Cariverona:“Development and validation of a novel molecular assay forα-synuclein in patients with Parkinson’s disease and otherα-synucleinopathies”#2018.0708 to GZ and Brain Research Verona Foundation to GZ.Dr.Elena Fontana is attending a doctoral fellowship supported by COPAN group.
文摘Background: In patients with Parkinson’s disease (PD), real-time quaking-induced conversion (RT-QuIC) detection of pathological α-synuclein (α-syn) in olfactory mucosa (OM) is not as accurate as in other α-synucleinopathies. It is unknown whether these variable results might be related to a different distribution of pathological α-syn in OM. Thus, we investigated whether nasal swab (NS) performed in areas with a different coverage by olfactory neuroepithelium, such as agger nasi (AN) and middle turbinate (MT), might affect the detection of pathological α-syn. Methods: NS was performed in 66 patients with PD and 29 non-PD between September 2018 and April 2021. In 43 patients, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) was also obtained and all samples were analyzed by RT-QuIC for α-syn. Results: In the first round, 72 OM samples were collected by NS, from AN (NSAN) or from MT (NSMT), and 35 resulted positive for α-syn RT-QuIC, including 27/32 (84%) from AN, 5/11 (45%) from MT, and 3/29 (10%) belonging to the non-PD patients. Furthermore, 23 additional PD patients underwent NS at both AN and MT, and RT-QuIC revealed α-syn positive in 18/23 (78%) NSAN samples and in 10/23 (44%) NSMT samples. Immunocytochemistry of NS prepara-tions showed a higher representation of olfactory neural cells in NSAN compared to NSMT. We also observed α-syn and phospho-α-syn deposits in NS from PD patients but not in controls. Finally, RT-QuIC was positive in 22/24 CSF samples from PD patients (92%) and in 1/19 non-PD. Conclusion: In PD patients, RT-QuIC sensitivity is significantly increased (from 45% to 84%) when NS is performed at AN, indicating that α-syn aggregates are preferentially detected in olfactory areas with higher concentration of olfactory neurons. Although RT-QuIC analysis of CSF showed a higher diagnostic accuracy compared to NS, due to the non-invasiveness, NS might be considered as an ancillary procedure for PD diagnosis.
文摘Correction:Translational Neurodegeneration(2022)11:37 https://doi.org/10.1186/s40035-022-00311-3 In the original publication of this article[1],“AN”is miss-ing in the column heading“Patients underwent NS at the(n=46)”in Table 1 due to a typesetting error.The correct column heading should be“Patients underwent NS at the AN(n=46)”.Moreover,the asterisk symbol*in“27(84)*”and“5(45)*”should be removed.In addition,the phrase“using FLOQBrushes(Copan Italia,Brescia,Italy)”needs be added in the first sentence under the header“OM sample collection”of the Methods section.