AIM: To investigate the clinicopathological features of intraductal neoplasm of the intrahepatic bile duct (INihB). METHODS: Clinicopathological features of 24 cases of INihB, which were previously diagnosed as biliar...AIM: To investigate the clinicopathological features of intraductal neoplasm of the intrahepatic bile duct (INihB). METHODS: Clinicopathological features of 24 cases of INihB, which were previously diagnosed as biliary papillomatosis or intraductal growth of intrahepatic biliary neoplasm, were reviewed. Mucin immunohistochemistry was performed for mucin (MUC)1, MUC2, MUC5AC and MUC6. Ki-67, P53 and β-catenin immunoreactivity were also examined. We categorized each tumor as adenoma (low grade), borderline (intermediate grade), and malignant (carcinoma in situ , high grade including tumors with microinvasion). RESULTS: Among 24 cases of INihB, we identified 24 tumors. Twenty of 24 tumors (83%) were composed of a papillary structure; the same feature observed in intraductal papillary neoplasm of the bile duct (IPNB). In contrast, the remaining four tumors (17%) showed both tubular and papillary structures. In three of the four tumors (75%), macroscopic mucin secretion was limited but microscopic intracellular mucin was evident. Histologically, 16 tumors (67%) were malignant, three (12%) were borderline, and five (21%) were adenoma. Microinvasion was found in four cases (17%). Immunohistochemical analysis revealed that MUC1 was not expressed in the borderline/adenoma group but was expressed only in malignant lesions (P = 0.0095). Ki-67 labeling index (LI) was significantly higher in the malignant group than in the borderline/adenoma group (22.2 ± 15.5 vs 7.5 ± 6.3, P < 0.01). In the 16 malignant cases, expression of MUC5AC showed borderline significant association with high Ki-67 LI (P = 0.0622). Nuclear expression of β-catenin was observed in two (8%) of the 24 tumors, and these two tumors also showed MUC1 expression. P53 was negative in all tumors. CONCLUSION: Some cases of INihB have a tubular structure, and are subcategorized as IPNB with tubular structure. MUC1 expression in INihB correlates positively with degree of malignancy.展开更多
Background:Antiangiogenic tyrosine kinase inhibitors(TKIs)provide one of the few therapeutic options for effective treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC).However,patients with HCC often develop resistance toward a...Background:Antiangiogenic tyrosine kinase inhibitors(TKIs)provide one of the few therapeutic options for effective treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC).However,patients with HCC often develop resistance toward antiangiogenic TKIs,and the underlying mechanisms are not understood.The aim of this study was to determine the mechanisms underlying antiangiogenic TKI resistance in HCC.Methods:We used an unbiased proteomic approach to define proteins that were responsible for the resistance to antiangiogenic TKIs in HCC patients.We evaluated the prognosis,therapeutic response,and serum insulin-like growth factor-binding protein-1(IGFBP-1)levels of 31 lenvatinib-treated HCC patients.Based on the array of results,a retrospective clinical study and preclinical experiments using mouse and human hepatoma cells were conducted.Additionally,in vivo genetic and pharmacological gain-and loss-of-function experiments were performed.Results:In the patient cohort,IGFBP-1 was identified as the signaling molecule with the highest expression that was inversely associated with overall survival.Mechanistically,antiangiogenic TKI treatment markedly elevated tumor IGFBP-1 levels via the hypoxia-hypoxia inducible factor signaling.IGFBP-1 stimulated angiogenesis through activation of the integrinα5β1-focal adhesion kinase pathway.Consequently,loss of IGFBP-1 and integrinα5β1 by genetic and pharmacological approaches re-sensitized HCC to lenvatinib treatment.Conclusions:Together,our data shed light onmechanisms underlying acquired resistance of HCC to antiangiogenic TKIs.Antiangiogenic TKIs induced an increase of tumor IGFBP-1,which promoted angiogenesis through activating the IGFBP-1-integrinα5β1 pathway.These data bolster the application of a new therapeutic concept by combining antiangiogenic TKIs with IGFBP-1 inhibitors.展开更多
文摘AIM: To investigate the clinicopathological features of intraductal neoplasm of the intrahepatic bile duct (INihB). METHODS: Clinicopathological features of 24 cases of INihB, which were previously diagnosed as biliary papillomatosis or intraductal growth of intrahepatic biliary neoplasm, were reviewed. Mucin immunohistochemistry was performed for mucin (MUC)1, MUC2, MUC5AC and MUC6. Ki-67, P53 and β-catenin immunoreactivity were also examined. We categorized each tumor as adenoma (low grade), borderline (intermediate grade), and malignant (carcinoma in situ , high grade including tumors with microinvasion). RESULTS: Among 24 cases of INihB, we identified 24 tumors. Twenty of 24 tumors (83%) were composed of a papillary structure; the same feature observed in intraductal papillary neoplasm of the bile duct (IPNB). In contrast, the remaining four tumors (17%) showed both tubular and papillary structures. In three of the four tumors (75%), macroscopic mucin secretion was limited but microscopic intracellular mucin was evident. Histologically, 16 tumors (67%) were malignant, three (12%) were borderline, and five (21%) were adenoma. Microinvasion was found in four cases (17%). Immunohistochemical analysis revealed that MUC1 was not expressed in the borderline/adenoma group but was expressed only in malignant lesions (P = 0.0095). Ki-67 labeling index (LI) was significantly higher in the malignant group than in the borderline/adenoma group (22.2 ± 15.5 vs 7.5 ± 6.3, P < 0.01). In the 16 malignant cases, expression of MUC5AC showed borderline significant association with high Ki-67 LI (P = 0.0622). Nuclear expression of β-catenin was observed in two (8%) of the 24 tumors, and these two tumors also showed MUC1 expression. P53 was negative in all tumors. CONCLUSION: Some cases of INihB have a tubular structure, and are subcategorized as IPNB with tubular structure. MUC1 expression in INihB correlates positively with degree of malignancy.
基金Ishibashi Foundation for the Promotion of ScienceTakeda Science Foundation+3 种基金Shinnihon Foundation of Advanced Medical Treatment Researchthe Kurume University Branding Projectthe Yasuda Medical Foundationthe JSPS KAKENHI grant。
文摘Background:Antiangiogenic tyrosine kinase inhibitors(TKIs)provide one of the few therapeutic options for effective treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC).However,patients with HCC often develop resistance toward antiangiogenic TKIs,and the underlying mechanisms are not understood.The aim of this study was to determine the mechanisms underlying antiangiogenic TKI resistance in HCC.Methods:We used an unbiased proteomic approach to define proteins that were responsible for the resistance to antiangiogenic TKIs in HCC patients.We evaluated the prognosis,therapeutic response,and serum insulin-like growth factor-binding protein-1(IGFBP-1)levels of 31 lenvatinib-treated HCC patients.Based on the array of results,a retrospective clinical study and preclinical experiments using mouse and human hepatoma cells were conducted.Additionally,in vivo genetic and pharmacological gain-and loss-of-function experiments were performed.Results:In the patient cohort,IGFBP-1 was identified as the signaling molecule with the highest expression that was inversely associated with overall survival.Mechanistically,antiangiogenic TKI treatment markedly elevated tumor IGFBP-1 levels via the hypoxia-hypoxia inducible factor signaling.IGFBP-1 stimulated angiogenesis through activation of the integrinα5β1-focal adhesion kinase pathway.Consequently,loss of IGFBP-1 and integrinα5β1 by genetic and pharmacological approaches re-sensitized HCC to lenvatinib treatment.Conclusions:Together,our data shed light onmechanisms underlying acquired resistance of HCC to antiangiogenic TKIs.Antiangiogenic TKIs induced an increase of tumor IGFBP-1,which promoted angiogenesis through activating the IGFBP-1-integrinα5β1 pathway.These data bolster the application of a new therapeutic concept by combining antiangiogenic TKIs with IGFBP-1 inhibitors.