Background:Lymphatic filariasis(LF)is one of the primary causes of lymphoedema in sub-Saharan Africa,and has a significant impact on the quality of life(QoL)of those affected.In this paper we assess the relative impac...Background:Lymphatic filariasis(LF)is one of the primary causes of lymphoedema in sub-Saharan Africa,and has a significant impact on the quality of life(QoL)of those affected.In this paper we assess the relative impact of lymphoedema on mobility and income in Chikwawa district,Malawi.Methods:A random sample of 31 people with lymphoedema and 31 matched controls completed a QoL questionnaire from which both an overall and a mobility-specific score were calculated.Two mobility tests were undertaken,namely the 10 m walking test[10MWT]and timed up and go[TUG]test,and a subset of 10 casescontrol pairs wore GPS data loggers for 3 weeks to measure their mobility in a more natural setting.Retrospective economic data was collected from all 31 case-control pairs,and each participant undertaking the GPS activity recorded daily earnings and health expenditure throughout the observation period.Results:Cases had a significantly poorer overall QoL(cases=32.2,controls=6.0,P<0.01)and mobility-specific(cases=43.1,controls=7.4,P<0.01)scores in comparison to controls.Cases were also significantly slower(P<0.01)at completing the timed mobility tests,e.g.mean 10MWT speed of 0.83 m/s in comparison to 1.10 m/s for controls.An inconsistent relationship was observed between mobility-specific QoL scores and the timed test results for cases(10MWT correlation=−0.06,95%CI=(−0.41,0.30)),indicating that their perceived disability differed from their measured disability,whereas the results were consistent for controls(10MWT correlation=−0.61,95%CI=(−0.79,−0.34)).GPS summaries indicated that cases generally walk shorter distances at slower speeds than control,covering a smaller geographical area(median area by kernel smoothing:cases=1.25 km2,controls=2.10 km^(2),P=0.16).Cases reported earning less than half that earned by controls per week(cases=$0.70,controls=$1.86,P=0.064),with a smaller proportion of their earnings(16%vs 22%,P=0.461)being spent on healthcare.Conclusions:Those affected by lymphoedema are at a clear disadvantage to their unaffected peers,experiencing a lower QoL as confirmed by both subjective and objective mobility measures,and lower income.This study also indicates that objective measures of mobility may be a useful supplement to self-assessed QoL questionnaires when assessing the future impact of lymphoedema management interventions.展开更多
基金Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine with grant support from the UK Department for International Development(DFID)The funder did not have any role in any aspect of this study.
文摘Background:Lymphatic filariasis(LF)is one of the primary causes of lymphoedema in sub-Saharan Africa,and has a significant impact on the quality of life(QoL)of those affected.In this paper we assess the relative impact of lymphoedema on mobility and income in Chikwawa district,Malawi.Methods:A random sample of 31 people with lymphoedema and 31 matched controls completed a QoL questionnaire from which both an overall and a mobility-specific score were calculated.Two mobility tests were undertaken,namely the 10 m walking test[10MWT]and timed up and go[TUG]test,and a subset of 10 casescontrol pairs wore GPS data loggers for 3 weeks to measure their mobility in a more natural setting.Retrospective economic data was collected from all 31 case-control pairs,and each participant undertaking the GPS activity recorded daily earnings and health expenditure throughout the observation period.Results:Cases had a significantly poorer overall QoL(cases=32.2,controls=6.0,P<0.01)and mobility-specific(cases=43.1,controls=7.4,P<0.01)scores in comparison to controls.Cases were also significantly slower(P<0.01)at completing the timed mobility tests,e.g.mean 10MWT speed of 0.83 m/s in comparison to 1.10 m/s for controls.An inconsistent relationship was observed between mobility-specific QoL scores and the timed test results for cases(10MWT correlation=−0.06,95%CI=(−0.41,0.30)),indicating that their perceived disability differed from their measured disability,whereas the results were consistent for controls(10MWT correlation=−0.61,95%CI=(−0.79,−0.34)).GPS summaries indicated that cases generally walk shorter distances at slower speeds than control,covering a smaller geographical area(median area by kernel smoothing:cases=1.25 km2,controls=2.10 km^(2),P=0.16).Cases reported earning less than half that earned by controls per week(cases=$0.70,controls=$1.86,P=0.064),with a smaller proportion of their earnings(16%vs 22%,P=0.461)being spent on healthcare.Conclusions:Those affected by lymphoedema are at a clear disadvantage to their unaffected peers,experiencing a lower QoL as confirmed by both subjective and objective mobility measures,and lower income.This study also indicates that objective measures of mobility may be a useful supplement to self-assessed QoL questionnaires when assessing the future impact of lymphoedema management interventions.
