Auditory change detection studies have shown that a repetition effect occurs when the response-stimulus interval is less than 500 ms. However, this response repetition effect is variable. Forty healthy young subjects ...Auditory change detection studies have shown that a repetition effect occurs when the response-stimulus interval is less than 500 ms. However, this response repetition effect is variable. Forty healthy young subjects were asked to respond to target stimuli pertaining to event-related potentials as quickly and accurately as possible (10% target, inter-stimulus interval: 1500 ms). Reaction time (RT) for the targets was measured with electroencephalography. RT was found to be the fastest for the second instance of repeated targets and targets that appeared after 17 or more successive non-targets (p –0.9 μV baseline negative shift of the frontal scalpelectroencephalography100 ms before the upcoming stimulus, suggesting that SPN was observed after every target stimulus. The non-target stimuli immediately after target were accompanied by MMN. Therefore, we concluded that subjects prioritized instructions pertaining to quicker response than those pertaining to accuracy. That explains RTs of second instance of repeated target are one of the fastest and how mistakes occur for non-target immediately after target stimulus. Negative baseline shifts detected by electroencephalography in this variable task with target and non-target event-related potentials provide key elements in the understanding of auditory responses.展开更多
文摘Auditory change detection studies have shown that a repetition effect occurs when the response-stimulus interval is less than 500 ms. However, this response repetition effect is variable. Forty healthy young subjects were asked to respond to target stimuli pertaining to event-related potentials as quickly and accurately as possible (10% target, inter-stimulus interval: 1500 ms). Reaction time (RT) for the targets was measured with electroencephalography. RT was found to be the fastest for the second instance of repeated targets and targets that appeared after 17 or more successive non-targets (p –0.9 μV baseline negative shift of the frontal scalpelectroencephalography100 ms before the upcoming stimulus, suggesting that SPN was observed after every target stimulus. The non-target stimuli immediately after target were accompanied by MMN. Therefore, we concluded that subjects prioritized instructions pertaining to quicker response than those pertaining to accuracy. That explains RTs of second instance of repeated target are one of the fastest and how mistakes occur for non-target immediately after target stimulus. Negative baseline shifts detected by electroencephalography in this variable task with target and non-target event-related potentials provide key elements in the understanding of auditory responses.
