Protein-S-100-beta is increased in patients with decompensated cirrhosis admitted to ICU

Background Hepatic encephalopathy(HE)is highly prevalent in patients with liver diseases.The pathophysiology of HE is centered on the synergic role of hyperammonemia and systemic inflammation.However,some data suggest altered functioning of the blood–brain barrier(BBB).Assessing BBB function is challenging in clinical practice and at the bedside.Protein-S-100 Beta(PS100-Beta)could be a useful peripheral marker of BBB permeability in HE.This study aimed to assess plasmatic PS100-Beta levels in a prospective cohort of patients admitted to the intensive care unit(ICU)with decompensated cirrhosis with and without overt HE.Methods We retrospectively evaluated a prospective cohort of cirrhotic patients admitted to the ICU from October 2013 to September 2015 that had an available plasmatic PS100-Beta measurement.Patients with previous neurological impairment or limitation of intensive or resuscitative measures were excluded.Overt HE was defined as West-Haven grades 2 to 4.The patients were compared to a control cohort of outpatient clinic cirrhotic and non-cirrhotic patients explored for isolated elevation of liver enzymes.After ICU discharge,the patients were followed for at least 3 months for the occurrence of overt HE.Adverse outcomes(liver transplantation or death)were collected.The ability of PS100-Beta–in combination with other factors–to predict overt HE was evaluated in a multivariate analysis using logistic regression.Likelihood ratios were used to determine the effects and calculate odds ratios(OR).Survival analysis was performed by using the Kaplan–Meier method and survival between groups was compared using a Log-rank test.Results A total of 194 ICU patients and 207 outpatients were included in the study.Increased levels of plasmatic PS100-Beta were detected in the ICU decompensated cirrhotic patients compared with the outpatients([0.15±0.01]mg/L vs.[0.08±0]mg/L,P<0.001).ICU patients with overt HE had higher levels of PS100-Beta([0.19±0.03]mg/L)compared with the ICU patients without overt HE([0.13±0.01]mg/L)(P=0.003).PS100-Beta levels did not differ in outpatients with F 0–3 compared to F 4 fibrosis(P=0.670).PS100-Beta values were correlated with Child-Pugh score(P<0.001),Model for End-Stage Liver Disease(MELD)score(P=0.004),C-reactive protein(P<0.001),ammonemia(P<0.001),and chronic liver failure consortium(CLIF-C)organ failure(P<0.001)and CLIF-C acute-on-chronic(P=0.038)scores,but not with leukocytes(P=0.053),procalcitonin(PCT)(P=0.107),or the lymphocyte-to-neutrophil ratio in ICU patients(P=0.522).In a multivariate model including age,ammonemia,PS100-Beta,PCT,MELD,presence of transjugular portosystemic shunt,and sodium level,the diagnostic performance was 0.765 for the diagnosis of overt HE.Patients with a PS100-Beta level<0.12 mg/L had a better overall survival(P=0.019)and a better survival without liver transplantation(P=0.013).Conclusions Serum levels of PS100-Beta are elevated in ICU patients with decompensated cirrhosis,and even more so in those displaying overt HE,and the levels are correlated with outcome.This suggests an increase in the permeability of the BBB in these patients.

Variceal bleeding in cirrhotic patients

Variceal bleeding is one of the major causes of death in cirrhotic patients.The management during the acute phase and the secondary prophylaxis is well defined.Recent recommendations(2015 Baveno VI expert consensus)are available and should be followed for an optimal management,which must be performed as an emergency in a liver or general intensive-care unit.It is based on the early administration of a vasoactive drug(before endoscopy),an antibiotic prophylaxis and a restrictive transfusion strategy(hemoglobin target of 7 g/dL).The endoscopic treatment is based on band ligations.Sclerotherapy should be abandoned.In the most severe patients(Child Pugh C or B with active bleeding during initial endoscopy),transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt(TIPS)should be performed within 72 hours after admission to minimize the risk of rebleeding.Secondary prophylaxis is based on the association of non-selective beta-blockers(NSBBs)and repeated band ligations.TIPS should be considered when bleeding reoccurs in spite of a well-conducted secondary prophylaxis or when NSBBs are poorly tolerated.It should also be considered when bleeding is refractory.Liver transplantation should be discussed when bleeding is not controlled after TIPS insertion and in all cases when liver function is deteriorated.