Background:Optic nerve head measurements extracted from optical coherence tomography(OCT)show promise for monitoring clinical conditions with elevated optic nerve heads.The aim of this study is to compare reliability ...Background:Optic nerve head measurements extracted from optical coherence tomography(OCT)show promise for monitoring clinical conditions with elevated optic nerve heads.The aim of this study is to compare reliability within and between raters and between image acquisition devices of optic nerve measurements derived from OCT scans in eyes with varying degrees of optic nerve elevation.Methods:Wide angle line scans and narrow angle radial scans through optic nerve heads were obtained using three spectral domain(SD)OCT devices on 5 subjects(6 swollen optic nerves,4 normal optic nerves).Three raters independently semi-manually segmented the internal limiting membrane(ILM)and Bruch’s membrane(BM)on each scan using customized software.One rater segmented each scan twice.Segmentations were qualitatively and quantitatively compared.Inter-rater,intra-rater and inter-device reliability was assessed for the optic nerve cross sectional area calculated from the ILM and BM segmentations using intraclass correlation coefficients and graphical comparison.Results:Line scans from all devices were qualitatively similar.Radial scans for which frame rate could not be adjusted were of lower quality.Intra-rater reliability for segmentation and optic nerve cross sectional area was better than inter-rater reliability,which was better than inter-device reliability,though all ICC exceeded 0.95.Reliability was not impacted by the degree of optic nerve elevation.Conclusions:SD-OCT devices acquired similar quality scans of the optic nerve head,with choice of scan protocol affecting the quality.For image derived markers,variability between devices was greater than that attributable to inter and intra-rater differences.展开更多
基金National Institutes of Health K23 EY024345(to Heather Moss)P30026877(to the Stanford Department of Ophthalmology)an unrestricted grant from Research to Prevent Blindness to the Stanford Department of Ophthalmology.
文摘Background:Optic nerve head measurements extracted from optical coherence tomography(OCT)show promise for monitoring clinical conditions with elevated optic nerve heads.The aim of this study is to compare reliability within and between raters and between image acquisition devices of optic nerve measurements derived from OCT scans in eyes with varying degrees of optic nerve elevation.Methods:Wide angle line scans and narrow angle radial scans through optic nerve heads were obtained using three spectral domain(SD)OCT devices on 5 subjects(6 swollen optic nerves,4 normal optic nerves).Three raters independently semi-manually segmented the internal limiting membrane(ILM)and Bruch’s membrane(BM)on each scan using customized software.One rater segmented each scan twice.Segmentations were qualitatively and quantitatively compared.Inter-rater,intra-rater and inter-device reliability was assessed for the optic nerve cross sectional area calculated from the ILM and BM segmentations using intraclass correlation coefficients and graphical comparison.Results:Line scans from all devices were qualitatively similar.Radial scans for which frame rate could not be adjusted were of lower quality.Intra-rater reliability for segmentation and optic nerve cross sectional area was better than inter-rater reliability,which was better than inter-device reliability,though all ICC exceeded 0.95.Reliability was not impacted by the degree of optic nerve elevation.Conclusions:SD-OCT devices acquired similar quality scans of the optic nerve head,with choice of scan protocol affecting the quality.For image derived markers,variability between devices was greater than that attributable to inter and intra-rater differences.