Summary: The aim of this work was to determine the frequency of rectal prolapse and to describe the therapeutic aspects. Material and Methods: A descriptive study with a retrospective collection was carried out betwee...Summary: The aim of this work was to determine the frequency of rectal prolapse and to describe the therapeutic aspects. Material and Methods: A descriptive study with a retrospective collection was carried out between January 2013 and May 2016 in 29 months in the pediatric surgery department at the Center University Hospital of Brazzaville. Children between the ages of 1 and 15 years of age, treated for rectal prolapse and whose records were exploitable were included. The variables studied were: age, gender, parental socio-economic status, consultation time, preference factors, pre-admission treatment, treatment initiated and progression. Results: In 29 months, 22 cases of rectal prolapse were collected, i.e. a hospital frequency of 0.96%. The mean age was 4.5 years extremes (1 and 11 years). The average time of consultation was 5 days extremes (1 and 21 days). Diarrhea 5 cases (23%), constipation diarrhea 3 cases (14%), constipation 10 cases (45%), bronchopneumopathy 4 cases (18%). The treatment was surgical according to the Thiersch technique in all cases. The evolution was favorable. Conclusion: Rectal prolapse, a benign pathology, is relatively uncommon. Constipation remains the main factor favoring the need to take care of upstream. Treatment by the Thiersch method remains the first choice in children.展开更多
文摘Summary: The aim of this work was to determine the frequency of rectal prolapse and to describe the therapeutic aspects. Material and Methods: A descriptive study with a retrospective collection was carried out between January 2013 and May 2016 in 29 months in the pediatric surgery department at the Center University Hospital of Brazzaville. Children between the ages of 1 and 15 years of age, treated for rectal prolapse and whose records were exploitable were included. The variables studied were: age, gender, parental socio-economic status, consultation time, preference factors, pre-admission treatment, treatment initiated and progression. Results: In 29 months, 22 cases of rectal prolapse were collected, i.e. a hospital frequency of 0.96%. The mean age was 4.5 years extremes (1 and 11 years). The average time of consultation was 5 days extremes (1 and 21 days). Diarrhea 5 cases (23%), constipation diarrhea 3 cases (14%), constipation 10 cases (45%), bronchopneumopathy 4 cases (18%). The treatment was surgical according to the Thiersch technique in all cases. The evolution was favorable. Conclusion: Rectal prolapse, a benign pathology, is relatively uncommon. Constipation remains the main factor favoring the need to take care of upstream. Treatment by the Thiersch method remains the first choice in children.
