目的为了便于活体肾移植供者的管理,设计并应用了活体肾移植供者信息管理系统。方法系统采用三层架构作为系统框架、B/S结构作为系统网络结构,选取Java作为开发语言,Java EE作为开发平台,采用SQL Server 2014进行数据库管理,本系统包括...目的为了便于活体肾移植供者的管理,设计并应用了活体肾移植供者信息管理系统。方法系统采用三层架构作为系统框架、B/S结构作为系统网络结构,选取Java作为开发语言,Java EE作为开发平台,采用SQL Server 2014进行数据库管理,本系统包括患者信息管理、术前评估管理、围术期信息管理、随访管理、健康教育管理、统计查询以及系统管理七个模块。结果系统运行稳定、可靠,输入数据简单、快捷,查询、统计方便。结论通过系统对供者信息进行有效管理和规划,保障了供者近期和远期安全,提高了临床工作效率。展开更多
Background Our goal was to evaluate the outcomes of kidney transplants from controlled cardiac death donors compared with brain death donors by conducting a meta-analysis of cohort studies.Methods The PubMed database ...Background Our goal was to evaluate the outcomes of kidney transplants from controlled cardiac death donors compared with brain death donors by conducting a meta-analysis of cohort studies.Methods The PubMed database and EMBASE were searched from January 1980 to July 2013 to identify studies that met pre-stated inclusion criteria.Reference lists of retrieved articles were also reviewed.Two authors independently extracted information on the designs of the studies,the characteristics of the study participants,and outcome assessments.Results Nine cohort studies involving 84 398 participants were included in this meta-analysis; 3 014 received kidneys from controlled cardiac death donors and 80 684 from brain death donors.Warm ischemia time was significantly longer for the controlled cardiac death donor group.The incidence of delayed graft function was 2.74 times （P 〈0.001） greater in the controlled cardiac death donor group.The results are in favor of the brain death donor group on short-term patient and graft survival while this difference became nonsignificant at mid-term and long term.Sensitivity analysis yielded similar results.No evidence of publication bias was observed.Conclusion This meta-analysis of retrospective cohort studies suggests that the outcome after controlled cardiac death donors is comparable with that obtained using kidneys from brain death donors.展开更多
文摘目的为了便于活体肾移植供者的管理,设计并应用了活体肾移植供者信息管理系统。方法系统采用三层架构作为系统框架、B/S结构作为系统网络结构,选取Java作为开发语言,Java EE作为开发平台,采用SQL Server 2014进行数据库管理,本系统包括患者信息管理、术前评估管理、围术期信息管理、随访管理、健康教育管理、统计查询以及系统管理七个模块。结果系统运行稳定、可靠,输入数据简单、快捷,查询、统计方便。结论通过系统对供者信息进行有效管理和规划,保障了供者近期和远期安全,提高了临床工作效率。
文摘Background Our goal was to evaluate the outcomes of kidney transplants from controlled cardiac death donors compared with brain death donors by conducting a meta-analysis of cohort studies.Methods The PubMed database and EMBASE were searched from January 1980 to July 2013 to identify studies that met pre-stated inclusion criteria.Reference lists of retrieved articles were also reviewed.Two authors independently extracted information on the designs of the studies,the characteristics of the study participants,and outcome assessments.Results Nine cohort studies involving 84 398 participants were included in this meta-analysis; 3 014 received kidneys from controlled cardiac death donors and 80 684 from brain death donors.Warm ischemia time was significantly longer for the controlled cardiac death donor group.The incidence of delayed graft function was 2.74 times （P 〈0.001） greater in the controlled cardiac death donor group.The results are in favor of the brain death donor group on short-term patient and graft survival while this difference became nonsignificant at mid-term and long term.Sensitivity analysis yielded similar results.No evidence of publication bias was observed.Conclusion This meta-analysis of retrospective cohort studies suggests that the outcome after controlled cardiac death donors is comparable with that obtained using kidneys from brain death donors.
