Topography and space are two important factors determining plant species assemblages in forest communities.Quantification of the contribution of these two factors in determining species distribution helps us to evalua...Topography and space are two important factors determining plant species assemblages in forest communities.Quantification of the contribution of these two factors in determining species distribution helps us to evaluate their relative importance in determining species assemblages.This study aims to disentangle the effect of topography and space on the distributions of 14 dominant species in a subtropical mixed forest.Spearman correlation analysis and the torustranslation test were used to test the species–habitat associations.Variation partitioning was used to quantify the relative contributions of topography and space at three sampling scales and three life stages.Correlation analyses and torus-translation tests showed species abundance was mostly correlated with topographic wetness index,vertical distance from the channel network and convexity.Variation partitioning showed that pure topography,pure space and spatially structured topography explained about 2.1 %,41.2 % and 13.8 %of the variation in species distributions,respectively.For nine species,total topography fractions peaked in 20 m quadrats.For ten species,the pure space fractions peaked in 50 m quadrats.For many species,the total topography fraction andthe pure space fraction were larger for the most abundant life stages,which reflected the importance of sampling effect.However,some cases did not follow this trend suggesting that the effects of ecological processes such as habitat filtering,density dependence or dispersal limitation may exceed the sampling effects.In conclusion,we found that spatially structured topography and pure space primarily shaped the distribution of dominant tree species.Furthermore,their effects were both scale- and life stage-dependent.展开更多
Aims seedlings are vulnerable to many kinds of fatal abiotic and biotic agents,and examining the causes of seedling dynamics can help understand mechanisms of species coexistence.To disentangle the relative importance...Aims seedlings are vulnerable to many kinds of fatal abiotic and biotic agents,and examining the causes of seedling dynamics can help understand mechanisms of species coexistence.To disentangle the relative importance of neighborhood densities,habitat factors and phylogenetic relatedness on focal seedling survival,we monitored the survival of 5306 seedlings of 104 species>15 months.We address the following questions:(i)How do neighborhood densities,habitat variables and phylogenetic relatedness affect seedling survival?What is the relative importance of conspecific densities,habitat variables and phylogenetic relatedness to seedling survival?(ii)Does the importance of the neighborhood densities,habitat variables and phylogenetic relatedness vary among growth forms,leaf habits or dispersal modes?specially,does the conspecific negative density dependence inhibit tree and decidu-ous seedlings more compared with shrub and evergreen species?Does density dependence affect the wind and animal-dispersed species equally?Methods We established 135 census stations to monitor seedling dynamics in a 25-ha subtropical forest plot in central China.Conspecific and heterospecific seedling density in the 1-m2 seedling plot and adult basal area within a 20-m radius provided neighborhood density var-iables.mean elevation,convexity and aspect of every 5-×5-m grid with seedling plots were used to quantify habitat characteristics.We calculated the relative average phylodiversity between focal seed-ling and heterospecific neighbors to quantify the species related-ness in the neighborhood.Eight candidate generalized linear mixed models with binominal error distribution were used to compare the relative importance of these variables to seedling survival.akaike’s information criteria were used to identify the most parsimonious models.Important Findingsat the community level,both the neighborhood densities and phylogenetic relatedness were important to seedling survival.We found negative effects of increasing conspecific seedlings,which suggested the existence of species-specific density-dependent mortality.Phylodiversity of heterospecific neighbors was negatively related to survival of focal seedlings,indicating similar habitat preference shared among phylogenetically closely related species may drive seedling survival.The relative importance of neighborhood densities,habitat variables and phylogenetic relatedness varied among ecological guilds.Conspecific densities had significant negative effect for deciduous and wind-dispersed species,and marginally significant for tree seedlings>10 cm tall and animal-dispersed species.Habitat variables had limited effects on seedling survival,and only elevation was related to the sur-vival of evergreen species in the best-fit model.We conclude that both negative density-dependent mortality and habitat preference reflected by the phylogenetic relatedness shape the species coex-istence at seedling stage in this forest.展开更多
Aims Topography has long been recognized as an important factor in shaping species distributions.Many studies revealed that species may show species-habitat associations.However,few studies inves-tigate how species as...Aims Topography has long been recognized as an important factor in shaping species distributions.Many studies revealed that species may show species-habitat associations.However,few studies inves-tigate how species assemblages are associated with local habitats,and it still remains unclear how the community-habitat associa-tions vary with species abundance class and life stage.In this study,we analyzed the community-habitat associations in a subtropical montane forest.Methods The fully mapped 25-ha(500×500 m)forest plot is located in Badagongshan Nature Reserve in Hunan Province,Central China.It was divided into 625(20×20 m)quadrats.Habitat types were classified by multivariate regression tree analyses that cluster areas with similar species composition according to the topographic characteristics.Indicator species analysis was used to identify the most important species for structuring species assemblages.We also compared the community-habitat associations for two levels of species abundances(i.e.abundant and rare)and three different life stages(i.e.saplings,juveniles and adults),while accounting for sample size effects.Important Findings The Badagongshan plot was divided into five distinct habitat types,which explained 34.7%of the variance in tree species composi-tion.Even with sample size taken into account,community-habi-tat associations for rare species were much weaker than those for abundant species.Also when accounting for sample size,very small differences were found in the variance explained by topography for the three life stages.Indicator species of habitat types were mainly abundant species,and nearly all adult stage indicator species were also indicators in juvenile and sapling stages.Our study manifested that topographical habitat filtering was important in shaping over-all local species compositions.However,habitat filtering was not important in shaping rare species’distributions in this forest.The community-habitat association patterns in this forest were mainly shaped by abundant species.In addition,during the transitions from saplings to juveniles,and from juveniles to adults,the relative importance of habitat filtering was very weak.展开更多
Aims Exploring species-genetic diversity correlation(SGDC)is essential for understanding spatial patterns of diversity and the underlying mechanisms.Until now,latitudinal patterns of species diversity(SD)and genetic d...Aims Exploring species-genetic diversity correlation(SGDC)is essential for understanding spatial patterns of diversity and the underlying mechanisms.Until now,latitudinal patterns of species diversity(SD)and genetic diversity(GD)were rarely studied simultaneously.As the freezing-tolerance hypothesis predicts a decrease of SD from low to high latitudes and the central-marginal hypothesis predicts a unimodal pattern of GD along latitude,we hypothesized that SD and GD are uncorrelated.We also tested how climatic and edaphic factors affect the correlation between the two levels of biodiversity.Methods We measured(i)SD(species richness and Simpson’s diversity index)and community dissimilarity of woody plants(63 plots),(ii)GD(al-lelic richness and expected heterozygosity)and genetic differen-tiation of a dominant tree species(Euptelea pleiospermum;678 individuals from 21 populations)using nuclear microsatellite data,and(iii)climatic(annual mean precipitation,annual mean tempera-ture,minimum temperature,maximum temperature,annual rela-tive moisture,solar radiation,photosynthetically active radiation)and edaphic(total C,total N,total P,available P,K,Ca,Mg,Al,Fe,Mn,Ni,Zn,B,Mo,Cu,pH)variables of 21 sites.We conducted both linear and quadratic regression analyses of diversity param-eters against latitude.Relationships between SD and GD were tested using Pearson’s correlation.Pearson’s and Spearman’sρcor-relation coefficients were calculated between diversity parameters and environmental variables.We used stepwise multiple regression analysis to identify the significant environmental predictors of SD and GD.Important Findings We observed no significant correlation between measures of SD and GD.SD decreases with increasing latitude,which can be partly explained by the freezing-tolerance hypothesis,whereas GD pre-sents a unimodal pattern along the latitudinal gradient,which is consistent with the prediction of the central-marginal hypothesis.The contrasting latitudinal patterns of SD and GD indicate that the two levels of biodiversity do not co-vary in space.Based on both correlation analysis and stepwise multiple regression analysis,SD is only related to climatic variables,whereas GD is mainly related to edaphic variables.Our results show that different geographical and environmental factors affect SD and GD,driving the non-significant correlation between the two fundamental levels of biodiversity.Furthermore,a significantly positive correlation was observed be-tween genetic distance and community dissimilarity,both of which were significantly correlated with geographical distance.展开更多
基金supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China(31270562 and 31200329)the Chinese Forest Biodiversity Monitoring Network(29200931131101919)
文摘Topography and space are two important factors determining plant species assemblages in forest communities.Quantification of the contribution of these two factors in determining species distribution helps us to evaluate their relative importance in determining species assemblages.This study aims to disentangle the effect of topography and space on the distributions of 14 dominant species in a subtropical mixed forest.Spearman correlation analysis and the torustranslation test were used to test the species–habitat associations.Variation partitioning was used to quantify the relative contributions of topography and space at three sampling scales and three life stages.Correlation analyses and torus-translation tests showed species abundance was mostly correlated with topographic wetness index,vertical distance from the channel network and convexity.Variation partitioning showed that pure topography,pure space and spatially structured topography explained about 2.1 %,41.2 % and 13.8 %of the variation in species distributions,respectively.For nine species,total topography fractions peaked in 20 m quadrats.For ten species,the pure space fractions peaked in 50 m quadrats.For many species,the total topography fraction andthe pure space fraction were larger for the most abundant life stages,which reflected the importance of sampling effect.However,some cases did not follow this trend suggesting that the effects of ecological processes such as habitat filtering,density dependence or dispersal limitation may exceed the sampling effects.In conclusion,we found that spatially structured topography and pure space primarily shaped the distribution of dominant tree species.Furthermore,their effects were both scale- and life stage-dependent.
基金National Natural Science Foundation of China(31070465 and 31200329)Chinese Forest Biodiversity Monitoring Network(29200931131101919).
文摘Aims seedlings are vulnerable to many kinds of fatal abiotic and biotic agents,and examining the causes of seedling dynamics can help understand mechanisms of species coexistence.To disentangle the relative importance of neighborhood densities,habitat factors and phylogenetic relatedness on focal seedling survival,we monitored the survival of 5306 seedlings of 104 species>15 months.We address the following questions:(i)How do neighborhood densities,habitat variables and phylogenetic relatedness affect seedling survival?What is the relative importance of conspecific densities,habitat variables and phylogenetic relatedness to seedling survival?(ii)Does the importance of the neighborhood densities,habitat variables and phylogenetic relatedness vary among growth forms,leaf habits or dispersal modes?specially,does the conspecific negative density dependence inhibit tree and decidu-ous seedlings more compared with shrub and evergreen species?Does density dependence affect the wind and animal-dispersed species equally?Methods We established 135 census stations to monitor seedling dynamics in a 25-ha subtropical forest plot in central China.Conspecific and heterospecific seedling density in the 1-m2 seedling plot and adult basal area within a 20-m radius provided neighborhood density var-iables.mean elevation,convexity and aspect of every 5-×5-m grid with seedling plots were used to quantify habitat characteristics.We calculated the relative average phylodiversity between focal seed-ling and heterospecific neighbors to quantify the species related-ness in the neighborhood.Eight candidate generalized linear mixed models with binominal error distribution were used to compare the relative importance of these variables to seedling survival.akaike’s information criteria were used to identify the most parsimonious models.Important Findingsat the community level,both the neighborhood densities and phylogenetic relatedness were important to seedling survival.We found negative effects of increasing conspecific seedlings,which suggested the existence of species-specific density-dependent mortality.Phylodiversity of heterospecific neighbors was negatively related to survival of focal seedlings,indicating similar habitat preference shared among phylogenetically closely related species may drive seedling survival.The relative importance of neighborhood densities,habitat variables and phylogenetic relatedness varied among ecological guilds.Conspecific densities had significant negative effect for deciduous and wind-dispersed species,and marginally significant for tree seedlings>10 cm tall and animal-dispersed species.Habitat variables had limited effects on seedling survival,and only elevation was related to the sur-vival of evergreen species in the best-fit model.We conclude that both negative density-dependent mortality and habitat preference reflected by the phylogenetic relatedness shape the species coex-istence at seedling stage in this forest.
基金supported by the Strategic Priority Research Program of Chinese Academy of Sciences(XDA19050401)Maps in this article were reviewed by Ministry of Natural Resources of the People’s Republic of China(GS(2020)1044)。
基金National Natural Science Foundation of China(31270562,30900178,31200329 and 31500337)Key Laboratory of Aquatic Botany and Watershed Ecology,CAS(Y455432J02)the Chinese Forest Biodiversity Monitoring Network(29200931131101919).
文摘Aims Topography has long been recognized as an important factor in shaping species distributions.Many studies revealed that species may show species-habitat associations.However,few studies inves-tigate how species assemblages are associated with local habitats,and it still remains unclear how the community-habitat associa-tions vary with species abundance class and life stage.In this study,we analyzed the community-habitat associations in a subtropical montane forest.Methods The fully mapped 25-ha(500×500 m)forest plot is located in Badagongshan Nature Reserve in Hunan Province,Central China.It was divided into 625(20×20 m)quadrats.Habitat types were classified by multivariate regression tree analyses that cluster areas with similar species composition according to the topographic characteristics.Indicator species analysis was used to identify the most important species for structuring species assemblages.We also compared the community-habitat associations for two levels of species abundances(i.e.abundant and rare)and three different life stages(i.e.saplings,juveniles and adults),while accounting for sample size effects.Important Findings The Badagongshan plot was divided into five distinct habitat types,which explained 34.7%of the variance in tree species composi-tion.Even with sample size taken into account,community-habi-tat associations for rare species were much weaker than those for abundant species.Also when accounting for sample size,very small differences were found in the variance explained by topography for the three life stages.Indicator species of habitat types were mainly abundant species,and nearly all adult stage indicator species were also indicators in juvenile and sapling stages.Our study manifested that topographical habitat filtering was important in shaping over-all local species compositions.However,habitat filtering was not important in shaping rare species’distributions in this forest.The community-habitat association patterns in this forest were mainly shaped by abundant species.In addition,during the transitions from saplings to juveniles,and from juveniles to adults,the relative importance of habitat filtering was very weak.
基金This work was supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China(31270562 to M.J.and 31470515 to X.W.)the Youth Innovation Promotion Association,Chinese Academy of Sciences(2014314)to X.W.
文摘Aims Exploring species-genetic diversity correlation(SGDC)is essential for understanding spatial patterns of diversity and the underlying mechanisms.Until now,latitudinal patterns of species diversity(SD)and genetic diversity(GD)were rarely studied simultaneously.As the freezing-tolerance hypothesis predicts a decrease of SD from low to high latitudes and the central-marginal hypothesis predicts a unimodal pattern of GD along latitude,we hypothesized that SD and GD are uncorrelated.We also tested how climatic and edaphic factors affect the correlation between the two levels of biodiversity.Methods We measured(i)SD(species richness and Simpson’s diversity index)and community dissimilarity of woody plants(63 plots),(ii)GD(al-lelic richness and expected heterozygosity)and genetic differen-tiation of a dominant tree species(Euptelea pleiospermum;678 individuals from 21 populations)using nuclear microsatellite data,and(iii)climatic(annual mean precipitation,annual mean tempera-ture,minimum temperature,maximum temperature,annual rela-tive moisture,solar radiation,photosynthetically active radiation)and edaphic(total C,total N,total P,available P,K,Ca,Mg,Al,Fe,Mn,Ni,Zn,B,Mo,Cu,pH)variables of 21 sites.We conducted both linear and quadratic regression analyses of diversity param-eters against latitude.Relationships between SD and GD were tested using Pearson’s correlation.Pearson’s and Spearman’sρcor-relation coefficients were calculated between diversity parameters and environmental variables.We used stepwise multiple regression analysis to identify the significant environmental predictors of SD and GD.Important Findings We observed no significant correlation between measures of SD and GD.SD decreases with increasing latitude,which can be partly explained by the freezing-tolerance hypothesis,whereas GD pre-sents a unimodal pattern along the latitudinal gradient,which is consistent with the prediction of the central-marginal hypothesis.The contrasting latitudinal patterns of SD and GD indicate that the two levels of biodiversity do not co-vary in space.Based on both correlation analysis and stepwise multiple regression analysis,SD is only related to climatic variables,whereas GD is mainly related to edaphic variables.Our results show that different geographical and environmental factors affect SD and GD,driving the non-significant correlation between the two fundamental levels of biodiversity.Furthermore,a significantly positive correlation was observed be-tween genetic distance and community dissimilarity,both of which were significantly correlated with geographical distance.