期刊文献+
共找到2篇文章
< 1 >
每页显示 20 50 100
帕博利珠单抗单药或联合化疗对PD-L1≥50%晚期NSCLC疗效的回顾性分析 被引量:1
1
作者 Ya CHEN Yanan WANG +7 位作者 Zhengyu YANG minjuan hu Yanwei ZHANG Fangfei QIAN Wei ZHANG Bo ZHANG Baohui HAN 王李强(翻译校对) 《中国肺癌杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2022年第2期I0007-I0016,共10页
目的该研究旨在评估及比较帕博利珠单抗联合含铂化疗(pembrolizumab plus platinum-based chemotherapy,PC)或帕博利珠单抗单药治疗(pembrolizumab monotherapy, PM)对程序性死亡配体1(programmed death ligand 1, PD-L1)肿瘤比例评分(t... 目的该研究旨在评估及比较帕博利珠单抗联合含铂化疗(pembrolizumab plus platinum-based chemotherapy,PC)或帕博利珠单抗单药治疗(pembrolizumab monotherapy, PM)对程序性死亡配体1(programmed death ligand 1, PD-L1)肿瘤比例评分(tumor proportion score, TPS)≥50%的晚期非小细胞肺癌(non-small cell lung cancer, NSCLC)患者的疗效。方法回顾性分析比较PM和PC作为一线治疗时,对PD-L1-TPS≥50%且无表皮生长因子受体(epidermal growth factor receptor,EGFR)和间变性淋巴瘤激酶(anaplastic lymphoma kinase, ALK)突变NSCLC患者的疗效。结果研究纳入115例PC和91例PM治疗患者。至2020年12月30日,中位随访时间为17.13个月。PC和PM组中位无进展生存期(progression-free survival, PFS)分别为12.37个月和9.60个月(HR:0.44, P<0.001)。中位总生存期(overall survival, OS)分别为未能评估(not evaluable, NE)和28.91个月(HR:0.40, P=0.005)。亚组分析发现,除脑转移患者外,PC对大多数患者的PFS均有显著改善。PC和PM组的1年OS率分别为89.3%和76.1%;客观缓解率分别为61.7和46.9%(P=0.004)。结论标准含铂化疗基础上联合帕博利珠单抗似乎是初治、PD-L1≥50%、无EGFR或ALK突变的晚期NSCLC患者治疗的更优方案,需前瞻性研究验证该结论。 展开更多
关键词 非小细胞肺癌 帕博利珠单抗 化疗 免疫治疗 程序性细胞死亡蛋白1
下载PDF
Equivalent efficacy assessment of QL1101 and bevacizumab in nonsquamous non-small cell lung cancer patients:A two-year follow-up data update 被引量:1
2
作者 Jun Lu Tianqing Chu +9 位作者 Hongyu Liu minjuan hu Yuqing Lou Yanwei Zhang Zhiqiang Gao Wei Zhang Xueyan Zhang huimin Wang hua Zhong Baohui Han 《Chinese Journal of Cancer Research》 SCIE CAS CSCD 2022年第1期28-39,共12页
Objective: Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor(VEGF) monoclonal antibodies are an effective means of treating non-small cell lung cancer(NSCLC). Here, we aim to update the equivalent efficacy assessment between QL... Objective: Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor(VEGF) monoclonal antibodies are an effective means of treating non-small cell lung cancer(NSCLC). Here, we aim to update the equivalent efficacy assessment between QL1101 and bevacizumab based on two-year follow-up data.Methods: In total, 535 eligible NSCLC patients were enrolled in this randomized controlled trial. Patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to the QL1101 group and the bevacizumab group. The full end time of this study was defined as 24 months after the last enrolled patient was randomized. The primary endpoint was the objective response rate(ORR);equivalence was confirmed if the two-sided 90% confidence interval(90% CI) of the relative risk was within the range of 0.75-1.33. The secondary endpoints were progression-free survival(PFS) and overall survival(OS).Results: The two-year updated data showed similar ORR(QL1101 vs. bevacizumab: 53.1% vs. 54.3%;relative risk=0.977;90% CI: 0.838-1.144), PFS(235 d vs. 254 d, log-rank P=0.311), and OS(577 d vs. 641 d, log-rank P=0.099) results between the QL1101 group and the bevacizumab group. The mean shrinkage ratio of targeted lesions was also similar between the QL1101 group and the bevacizumab group(22.5% vs. 23.5%). For patients who received QL1101 maintenance therapy, similar results were shown between the QL1101 group(n=157) and the bevacizumab group(n=148)(PFS: 253 d vs. 272 d, log-rank P=0.387;OS: 673 d vs. 790 d, log-rank P=0.101;mean tumor shrinkage rate: 26.6% vs. 27.5%).Conclusions: This study reported that QL1101 had similar efficacy in treating nonsquamous NSCLC in terms of ORR, PFS and OS based on two-year updated data, providing a basis for the clinical application of QL1101. 展开更多
关键词 QL1101 BIOSIMILAR non-small cell lung cancer BEVACIZUMAB VEGF
下载PDF
上一页 1 下一页 到第
使用帮助 返回顶部