BACKGROUND Post-polypectomy surveillance intervals are currently determined based on pathology results.AIM To evaluate a polyp-based resect and discard model that assigns surveillance intervals based solely on polyp n...BACKGROUND Post-polypectomy surveillance intervals are currently determined based on pathology results.AIM To evaluate a polyp-based resect and discard model that assigns surveillance intervals based solely on polyp number and size.METHODS Patients undergoing elective colonoscopies at the Montreal University Medical Center were enrolled prospectively.The polyp-based strategy was used to assign the next surveillance interval using polyp size and number.Surveillance intervals were also assigned using optical diagnosis for small polyps(<10 mm).The primary outcome was surveillance interval agreement between the polyp-based model,optical diagnosis,and the pathology-based reference standard using the 2020 United States Multi-Society Task Force guidelines.Secondary outcomes included the proportion of reduction in required histopathology evaluations and proportion of immediate post-colonoscopy recommendations provided to patients.RESULTS Of 944 patients(mean age 62.6 years,49.3%male,933 polyps)were enrolled.The surveillance interval agreement for the polyp-based strategy was 98.0%[95%confidence interval(CI):0.97-0.99]compared with pathology-based assignment.Optical diagnosis-based intervals achieved 95.8%(95%CI:0.94-0.97)agreement with pathology.When using the polyp-based strategy and optical diagnosis,the need for pathology assessment was reduced by 87.8%and 70.6%,respectively.The polyp-based strategy provided 93.7%of patients with immediate surveillance interval recommendations vs 76.1%for optical diagnosis.CONCLUSION The polyp-based strategy achieved almost perfect surveillance interval agreement compared with pathology-based assignments,significantly reduced the number of required pathology evaluations,and provided most patients with immediate surveillance interval recommendations.展开更多
基金The study protocol and data collection were approved by the local institutional research board as an amendment to the two prospective clinical studies(17.135 and 16.367,respectively).
文摘BACKGROUND Post-polypectomy surveillance intervals are currently determined based on pathology results.AIM To evaluate a polyp-based resect and discard model that assigns surveillance intervals based solely on polyp number and size.METHODS Patients undergoing elective colonoscopies at the Montreal University Medical Center were enrolled prospectively.The polyp-based strategy was used to assign the next surveillance interval using polyp size and number.Surveillance intervals were also assigned using optical diagnosis for small polyps(<10 mm).The primary outcome was surveillance interval agreement between the polyp-based model,optical diagnosis,and the pathology-based reference standard using the 2020 United States Multi-Society Task Force guidelines.Secondary outcomes included the proportion of reduction in required histopathology evaluations and proportion of immediate post-colonoscopy recommendations provided to patients.RESULTS Of 944 patients(mean age 62.6 years,49.3%male,933 polyps)were enrolled.The surveillance interval agreement for the polyp-based strategy was 98.0%[95%confidence interval(CI):0.97-0.99]compared with pathology-based assignment.Optical diagnosis-based intervals achieved 95.8%(95%CI:0.94-0.97)agreement with pathology.When using the polyp-based strategy and optical diagnosis,the need for pathology assessment was reduced by 87.8%and 70.6%,respectively.The polyp-based strategy provided 93.7%of patients with immediate surveillance interval recommendations vs 76.1%for optical diagnosis.CONCLUSION The polyp-based strategy achieved almost perfect surveillance interval agreement compared with pathology-based assignments,significantly reduced the number of required pathology evaluations,and provided most patients with immediate surveillance interval recommendations.
