院外心脏骤停期间心肺复苏的质量

Context: Cardiopulmonary resuscitation(CPR) guidelines recommend target values for compressions, ventilations, and CPR-free intervals allowed for rhythm analysis and defibrillation. There is little information on adherence to these guidelines during advanced cardiac life support in the field. Objective: To measure the quality of out-of-hospital CPR performed by ambulance personnel, as measured by adherence to CPR guidelines. Design and Setting: Case series of 176 adult patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest treated by paramedics and nurse anesthetists in Stockholm, Sweden, London, England, and Akershus, Norway, between March 2002 and October 2003. The defibrillators recorded chest compressions via a sternal pad fitted with an accelerometer and ventilations by changes in thoracic impedance between the defibrillator pads, in addition to standard event and electrocardiographic recordings. Main Outcome Measure: Adherence to international guidelines for CPR. Results: Chest compressions were not given 48%(95%CI, 45%-51%) of the time without spontaneous circulation; this percentage was 38%(95%CI, 36%-41%) when subtracting the time necessary for electrocardiographic analysis and defibrillation. Combining these data with a mean compression rate of 121/min(95%CI, 118-124/min) when compressions were given resulted in a mean compression rate of 64/min(95%CI, 61-67/min). Mean compression depth was 34mm(95%CI, 33-35 mm), 28%(95%CI, 24%-32%) of the compressions had a depth of 38 mm to 51 mm(guidelines recommendation), and the compression part of the duty cycle was 42%(95%CI, 41%-42%). A mean of 11(95%CI, 11-12) ventilations were given per minute. Sixty-one patients(35%) had return of spontaneous circulation, and 5 of 6 patients discharged alive from the hospital had normal neurological outcomes. Conclusions: In this study of CPR during outof-hospital cardiac arrest, chest compressions were not delivered half of the time, and most compressions were too shallow. Electrocardiographic analysis and defibrillation accounted for only small parts of intervals without chest compressions.

院内心脏骤停期间心肺复苏的质量

Context: The survival benefit of well-performed cardiopulmonary resuscitation(CPR) is well-documented, but little objective data exist regarding actual CPR quality during cardiac arrest. Recent studies have challenged the notion that CPR is uniformly performed according to established international guidelines. Objectives: To measure multiple parameters of in-hospital CPR quality and to determine compliance with published American Heart Association and international guidelines. Design and Setting: A prospective observational study of 67 patients who experienced in-hospital cardiac arrest at the University of Chicago Hospitals, Chicago, Ill, between December 11, 2002, and April 5, 2004. Using a monitor/-defibrillator with novel additional sensing capabilities, the parameters of CPR quality including chest compression rate, compression depth, ventilation rate, and the fraction of arrest time without chest compressions(no-flow fraction) were recorded. Main Outcome Measure: Adherence to American Heart Association and international CPR guidelines. Results: Analysis of the first 5 minutes of each resuscitation by 30-second segments revealed that chest compression rates were less than 90/min in 28.1%of segments. Compression depth was too shallow(defined as< 38 mm) for 37.4%of compressions. Ventilation rates were high, with 60.9%of segments containing a rate of more than 20/min. Additionally, the mean(SD) no-flow fraction was 0.24(0.18). A 10-second pause each minute of arrest would yield a no-flow fraction of 0.17. A total of 27 patients(40.3%) achieved return of spontaneous circulation and 7(10.4%) were discharged from the hospital. Conclusions: In this study of in-hospital cardiac arrest, the quality of multiple parameters of CPR was inconsistent and often did not meet published guideline recommendations, even when performed by well-trained hospital staff. The importance of high-quality CPR suggests the need for rescuer feedback and monitoring of CPR quality during resuscitation efforts.