期刊文献+
共找到1篇文章
< 1 >
每页显示 20 50 100
前次剖宫产分娩后阴道分娩和前次阴道分娩后剖宫产分娩产妇的满意度比较
1
作者 Dunn E.A. o'herlihyc. 高雪莲 《世界核心医学期刊文摘(妇产科学分册)》 2005年第11期15-15,共1页
Abstract:Abstract:Objectives: To compare (i) satisfaction levels among women who delivered vaginally after one previous caesarean (VBAC)-with women delivered by caesarean after previous vaginal delivery (CSAVD) and (i... Abstract:Abstract:Objectives: To compare (i) satisfaction levels among women who delivered vaginally after one previous caesarean (VBAC)-with women delivered by caesarean after previous vaginal delivery (CSAVD) and (ii) to assess reasons why women may request caesarean delivery on subsequent pregnancies. Study design: We conducted a prospective questionnaire-based study of maternal satisfaction following both modes of delivery during an 8-month period. Results: One hundred and forty women completed an early postnatal questionnaire, 70 each in VBAC and CSAVD cohorts. The vast majority in both groups were satisfied with their respective mode of delivery, but would opt for vaginal delivery in their next pregnancy (89% in VBAC versus 94% in CSAVD). The VBAC group experienced minimal pain after delivery and had felt better prepared for delivery (74% versus 41% in the CSAVD group). Reasons for dissatisfaction in the VBAC group included the physical stress of labour and inadequacy of analgesia. Conclusion: Maternal satisfaction with vaginal delivery is high. Those who have experienced both modes of delivery would prefer vaginal birth on future pregnancies. These findings are reassuring to women contemplating vaginal delivery. 展开更多
关键词 剖宫产分娩 意度 产后早期 前瞻性调查 疼痛感 问卷调查 研究设计 前有 中更
下载PDF
上一页 1 下一页 到第
使用帮助 返回顶部