选取长江上游地区生态环境相对脆弱的宜宾市为典型案例,分析其16年来NDVI所表征的植被生长动态变化。以MODIS MOD 13Q1为数据源,采用Sen+Manna-Kendall非参数检验方法和Hurst指数模型,分析NDVI时间变化特征、变化趋势与未来可持续特征,...选取长江上游地区生态环境相对脆弱的宜宾市为典型案例,分析其16年来NDVI所表征的植被生长动态变化。以MODIS MOD 13Q1为数据源,采用Sen+Manna-Kendall非参数检验方法和Hurst指数模型,分析NDVI时间变化特征、变化趋势与未来可持续特征,并应用空间转移矩阵和重心迁移模型分析其空间变化特征,最后应用地理探测器模型探测影响NDVI空间分布的主导因素,进一步揭示NDVI分异特征及其驱动力。结果表明:(1)2000—2015年宜宾市植被覆盖整体状况良好,自北向南逐渐优化,多年平均NDVI大于0.6的区域占52.06%。年际NDVI以极显著趋势波动增长,平均年际变化率达到0.007/a,极显著增长区域面积达70.18%。与此同时,NDVI增长整体持续性不强,未来可能出现波动的区域占53.65%。(2)2000—2015年间宜宾市植被生长以正向演进为主,演进过程和已有生态建设工程成效研究结论相符,生态环境不断优化。(3)宜宾市NDVI主要受一系列地表差异,包括海拔、年均温、土地利用类型、人口密度所决定,其因子解释力均超过25%,自然环境因素与人类活动共同作用对NDVI影响更加显著。展开更多
Assessing the effect of land use change on ecosystem service value(ESV) can provide reference for sustainable land use and ecological environment protection. The land use information was extracted and analyzed based o...Assessing the effect of land use change on ecosystem service value(ESV) can provide reference for sustainable land use and ecological environment protection. The land use information was extracted and analyzed based on Landsat TM images in Shuangliu County, Sichuan Province from 1992 to 2008, following remote sensing(RS) and GIS. The ESV of the land use change in study area was evaluated by adopting the service value method within Chinese terrestrial ecosystem. The results showed that:(1) the area of paddy field and forest land reduced in the 16 years, total area of construction land expanded fast on the basis of occupying paddy field and forest land.(2) The regional ESV increased by 4,508.859×104 RMB, but there is different change trend at different times, such as the ESV fell by 10.59% in 1992–2000, increased by 16.024% in 2000–2008.(3) The conversion from forest land and cultivated land to construction land caused a decline and negative flow in ESV, the total value was 2,197.233×104 RMB and 5,317.460×104 RMB.(4) All land use types showed that change of the ESV coefficient was less elastic, the relative sensitivity: forest land > cultivated land > water area. In terms of variability of ESV, water area change had greater influence on the change of ESV in the study area, and cultivated land and forest land had relatively smaller impact.展开更多
文摘选取长江上游地区生态环境相对脆弱的宜宾市为典型案例,分析其16年来NDVI所表征的植被生长动态变化。以MODIS MOD 13Q1为数据源,采用Sen+Manna-Kendall非参数检验方法和Hurst指数模型,分析NDVI时间变化特征、变化趋势与未来可持续特征,并应用空间转移矩阵和重心迁移模型分析其空间变化特征,最后应用地理探测器模型探测影响NDVI空间分布的主导因素,进一步揭示NDVI分异特征及其驱动力。结果表明:(1)2000—2015年宜宾市植被覆盖整体状况良好,自北向南逐渐优化,多年平均NDVI大于0.6的区域占52.06%。年际NDVI以极显著趋势波动增长,平均年际变化率达到0.007/a,极显著增长区域面积达70.18%。与此同时,NDVI增长整体持续性不强,未来可能出现波动的区域占53.65%。(2)2000—2015年间宜宾市植被生长以正向演进为主,演进过程和已有生态建设工程成效研究结论相符,生态环境不断优化。(3)宜宾市NDVI主要受一系列地表差异,包括海拔、年均温、土地利用类型、人口密度所决定,其因子解释力均超过25%,自然环境因素与人类活动共同作用对NDVI影响更加显著。
基金Funding for this study was provided by by National Natural Science Foundation of China(41371125)Scientific Research Fund of Sichuan Normal University(13ZDL03)Provincial Key Subject Foundation of Sichuan Normal University(Human Geography)
文摘Assessing the effect of land use change on ecosystem service value(ESV) can provide reference for sustainable land use and ecological environment protection. The land use information was extracted and analyzed based on Landsat TM images in Shuangliu County, Sichuan Province from 1992 to 2008, following remote sensing(RS) and GIS. The ESV of the land use change in study area was evaluated by adopting the service value method within Chinese terrestrial ecosystem. The results showed that:(1) the area of paddy field and forest land reduced in the 16 years, total area of construction land expanded fast on the basis of occupying paddy field and forest land.(2) The regional ESV increased by 4,508.859×104 RMB, but there is different change trend at different times, such as the ESV fell by 10.59% in 1992–2000, increased by 16.024% in 2000–2008.(3) The conversion from forest land and cultivated land to construction land caused a decline and negative flow in ESV, the total value was 2,197.233×104 RMB and 5,317.460×104 RMB.(4) All land use types showed that change of the ESV coefficient was less elastic, the relative sensitivity: forest land > cultivated land > water area. In terms of variability of ESV, water area change had greater influence on the change of ESV in the study area, and cultivated land and forest land had relatively smaller impact.