期刊文献+
共找到1篇文章
< 1 >
每页显示 20 50 100
Supervised vs home-based exercise program in kidney transplant recipients: A pilot pragmatic non-randomized study
1
作者 Anna Crepaldi Giovanni Piva +6 位作者 Nicola lamberti Michele Felisatti luca Pomidori Yuri Battaglia Fabio Manfredini Alda storari pablo jesús lópez-soto 《World Journal of Transplantation》 2024年第4期123-132,共10页
BACKGROUND Although the benefits of exercise for kidney transplant recipients(KTRs)have been widely demonstrated,these patients experience several barriers in undertaking a structured exercise program in hospital and ... BACKGROUND Although the benefits of exercise for kidney transplant recipients(KTRs)have been widely demonstrated,these patients experience several barriers in undertaking a structured exercise program in hospital and non-hospital facilities.AIM To compare the effects of a supervised moderate-intensity gym-based intervention with a home-based low-intensity walking program on exercise capacity in KTRs.METHODS KTRs were asked to choose between two six-month programs.The first group performed a low-intensity interval walking intervention at home-based exercise intervention (HBex). The second group performed a supervised training program at an adapted physical activitygym (Sgym), including aerobic and resistance training. The outcomes, collected at baseline and at the end of theprograms, included the 6-minute walking test, the peak oxygen consumption (VO_(2)peak) during a treadmill test,the 5-time sit-to-stand test, and blood pressure.RESULTSSeventeen patients agreed to participate and self-selected into the HBex (n = 9) and Sgym (n = 8) groups. Twopatients in the Sgym group dropped out because of familial problems. At baseline, patients in the HBex group weresignificantly older and had lower walking distance, VO_(2)peak, and lower limb strength. Primary outcome changeswere significantly greater in the HBex group than in the Sgym group (52 ± 23 m vs 8 ± 34;P = 0.005). No othersignificant differences between groups were observed. Both groups improved most of the outcomes in the withingroupcomparisons, with significant variations in VO_(2) peak.CONCLUSIONSix-month moderate-intensity supervised or low-intensity home-based training programs effectively improvedexercise capacity in KTRs. Gym-based programs combine aerobic and resistance training;however, in-homewalking may be proposed for frail KTRs. 展开更多
关键词 EXERCISE TRANSPLANTATION WALKING Training NEPHROLOGY Kidney disease
下载PDF
上一页 1 下一页 到第
使用帮助 返回顶部