Impact of treatment modalities on patients with recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma after liver transplantation:Preliminary experience

Background:Post-liver transplantation(LT)hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC)recurrence still occurs in approximately 20%of patients and drastically affects their survival.This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of various treatments for recurrent HCC after LT in a Chinese population.Methods:A total of 64 HCC patients with tumor recurrence after LT were enrolled in this study.Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify factors affecting post-recurrence survival.Results:Of the 64 patients with recurrent HCC after LT,those who received radical resection followed by nonsurgical therapy had a median overall survival(OS)of 20.9 months after HCC recurrence,significantly superior to patients who received only nonsurgical therapy(9.4 months)or best supportive care(2.4 months).The one-and two-year OS following recurrence was favorable for patients receiving radical resection followed by nonsurgical therapy(93.8%,52.6%),poor for patients receiving only nonsurgical therapy(30.8%,10.8%),and dismal for patients receiving best supportive care(0%,0%;overall P<0.001).Median OS in sorafenib-tolerant patients treated with lenvatinib was 19.5 months,far surpassing the patients that discontinued sorafenib or were treated with regorafenib after sorafenib failure(12 months,P<0.001).Compared with tacrolimus-based immunosuppressive therapy,OS was significantly increased with sirolimus-based therapy at one and two years after HCC recurrence(P=0.035).Multivariate analysis showed radical resection combined with nonsurgical therapy for recurrent HCC and sorafenib-lenvatinib sequential therapy were independent favorable factors for post-recurrence survival.Conclusions:Aggressive surgical intervention in well-selected patients significantly improves OS after recurrence.A multidisciplinary treatment approach is required to slow down disease progression for patients with unresectable recurrent HCC.

Alpha-fetoprotein and 18F-FDG standard uptake value predict tumor recurrence after liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein tumor thrombosis:Preliminary experience

Background:Portal vein tumor thrombosis(PVTT)is regarded as a contraindication for liver transplantation(LT)in hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC).However,some of these patients may have a favorable prognosis after LT.In this study,we evaluated the biological behavior of HCC with PVTT using tumor biomarker(alpha-fetoprotein,AFP)and 18 F-FDG positron emission tomography(tumor standard uptake value)to identify a subset of patients who may be suitable for LT.Methods:Seventy-five HCC-PVTT liver recipients transplanted during February 2016 and June 2018 were analyzed.Different pre-transplant prognostic factors were identified by univariate and multivariate analyses.PVTT status was identified following Vp classification(Vp1-Vp4).Results:Three-year recurrence-free survival and overall survival rates were 40%and 65.4%in Vp2-Vp3 PVTT patients,21.4%and 30.6%in Vp4 PVTT patients(P<0.05).Total tumor diameter>8 cm,pretransplant AFP level>1000 ng/m L and intrahepatic tumor maximal standard uptake value(SUVmaxtumor>5)were independent risk factors for HCC recurrence and overall survival after LT in Vp2-3 PVTT patients.Low risk patients were defined as total tumor diameter≤8 cm;or if total tumor diameter more than 8 cm,with both pre-transplant AFP level less than 1000 ng/m L and intrahepatic tumor SUVmax less than 5,simultaneously.Twenty-two Vp2-3 PVTT HCC patients(46.8%)were identified as low risk patients,and their 3-year recurrence-free and overall survival rates were 67.6%and 95.2%,respectively.Conclusions:Patients with segmental or lobar PVTT and biologically favorable tumors defined by AFP and 18 F-FDG SUVmax might be suitable for LT.

The “No-touch” technique improves the survival of patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinomas treated by liver transplantation: A single-center prospective randomized controlled trial

Background:Liver transplantation(LT)is the best treatment for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC).However,the surgical technique needs to be improved.The present study aimed to evaluate the“no-touch”technique in LT.Methods:From January 2018 to December 2019,we performed a prospective randomized controlled trial on HCC patients who underwent LT.The patients were randomized into two groups:a no-touch technique LT group(NT group,n=38)and a conventional LT technique group(CT group,n=46).Operative outcomes and survival in the two groups were analyzed.Results:The perioperative parameters were comparable between the two groups(P>0.05).There was no significant difference between the two groups in disease-free survival(DFS)(P=0.732)or overall survival(OS)(P=0.891).Of 36 patients who were beyond the Hangzhou criteria for LT,the DFS of the patients in the NT group was significantly longer than that in the CT group(median 402 vs.126 days,P=0.025).In 31 patients who had portal vein tumor thrombosis(PVTT),DFS and OS in the NT group were significantly better than those in the CT group(median DFS 420 vs.167 days,P=0.022;2-year OS rate 93.8%vs.66.7%,P=0.043).In 14 patients who had diffuse-type HCCs,DFS and OS were significantly better in the NT group than those in the CT group(median DFS 141 vs.56 days,P=0.008;2-year OS rate 75.0%vs.33.3%,P=0.034).Multivariate analysis showed that for patients with PVTT and diffusetype HCCs,the no-touch technique was an independent favorable factor for OS(PVTT:HR=0.018,95%CI:0.001-0.408,P=0.012;diffuse-type HCCs:HR=0.034,95%CI:0.002-0.634,P=0.024).Conclusions:The no-touch technique improved the survival of patients with advanced HCC compared with the conventional technique.The no-touch technique may provide a new and effective LT technique for advanced HCCs.

Combination of renoportal anastomosis and inferior mesenteric vein-portal anastomosis in liver transplantation:A new portal reconstruction technique

Liver transplantation (LT) is the only way to cure end-stage liver disease with or without tumors in the last few decades [1].However,critical issues such as how to rebuild portal flow in patients with portal vein thrombosis (PVT) or superior mesenteric vein (SMV) thrombosis have been challenging for surgeons.Adequate portal flow is critical in LT because more than 75%of the liver’s blood supply comes from the portal vein and the rest comes from the hepatic artery.PVT is a universal problem in LT.

Causal roles of gut microbiota in cholangiocarcinoma etiology suggested by genetic study

BACKGROUND Cholangiocarcinoma(CCA)is a highly malignant biliary tract cancer with poor prognosis.Previous studies have implicated the gut microbiota in CCA,but evidence for causal mechanisms is lacking.AIM To investigate the causal relationship between gut microbiota and CCA risk.METHODS We performed a two-sample mendelian randomization study to evaluate potential causal associations between gut microbiota and CCA risk using genome-wide association study summary statistics for 196 gut microbial taxa and CCA.Genetic variants were used as instrumental variables.Multiple sensitivity analyses assessed result robustness.RESULTS Fifteen gut microbial taxa showed significant causal associations with CCA risk.Higher genetically predicted abundance of genus Eubacteriumnodatum group,genus Ruminococcustorques group,genus Coprococcus,genus Dorea,and phylum Actinobacteria were associated with reduced risk of gallbladder cancer and extrahepatic CCA.Increased intrahepatic CCA risk was associated with higher abundance of family Veillonellaceae,genus Alistipes,order Enterobacteriales,and phylum Firmicutes.Protective effects against CCA were suggested for genus Collinsella,genus Eisenbergiella,genus Anaerostipes,genus Paraprevotella,genus Parasutterella,and phylum Verrucomicrobia.Sensitivity analyses indicated these findings were reliable without pleiotropy.CONCLUSION This pioneering study provides novel evidence that specific gut microbiota may play causal roles in CCA risk.Further experimental validation of these candidate microbes is warranted to consolidate causality and mechanisms.

Survival comparison between primary hepatic neuroendocrine neoplasms and primary pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms and the analysis on prognosis-related factors

Background:Primary hepatic neuroendocrine neoplasms(PHNENs)are extremely rare and few articles have compared the prognosis of PHNENs with other neuroendocrine neoplasms(NENs).This study aimed to investigate the different prognosis between PHNENs and pancreatic NEN(Pan NENs)and evaluate the relevant prognosis-related factors.Methods:From January 2012 to October 2016,a total of 44 NENs patients were enrolled and divided into two groups according to the primary tumor location which were named group PHNENs(liver;n=12)and group Pan NENs(pancreas;n=32).Demographic,clinical characteristics and survival data were compared between the two groups with Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank tests.Prognostic factors were analyzed using the Cox regression model.Results:The overall survival of group PHNENs and group Pan NENs were 25.4±6.7 months and 39.8±3.7 months,respectively(P=0.037).The cumulative survival of group Pan NENs was significantly higher than that of group PHNENs(P=0.029).Univariate analysis revealed that sex,albumin,total bilirubin,total bile acid,aspartate aminotransferase,alkaline phosphatase,α-fetoprotein and carbohydrate antigen 19-9,histological types,treatments and primary tumor site were the prognostic factors.Further multivariate analysis indicated that albumin(P=0.008),histological types NEC(P=0.035)and treatments(P=0.005)were the independent prognostic factors.Based on the histological types,the cumulative survival of patients with well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumor was significant higher than that of patients with poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinoma in group PHNENs(P=0.022),but not in group Pan NENs(P>0.05).According to the different treatments,patients who received surgery had significantly higher cumulative survival than those with conservative treatment in both groups(P<0.05).Conclusions:PHNENs have lower survival compared to Pan NENs.Histological types and treatments affect the prognosis.Surgical resection still remains the first line of treatment for resectable lesions and can significantly improve the survival.

Surgical treatment for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma:Current status and challenges

Primary liver cancer is the sixth most commonly diagnosed cancer and was the third leading cause of cancer deaths worldwide in 2020.It includes hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC)(representing 75%-85%of cases),intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma(representing 10%-15%of cases),and other rare types.The survival rate of patients with HCC has risen with improved surgical technology and perioperative management in recent years;however,high tumor recurrence rates continue to limit long-term survival,even after radical surgical resection(exceeding 50%recurrence).For resectable recurrent liver cancer,surgical removal[either salvage liver transplantation(SLT)or repeat hepatic resection]remains the most effective therapy that is potentially curative for recurrent HCC.Thus,here,we introduce surgical treatment for recurrent HCC.Areas Covered:A literature search was performed for recurrent HCC using Medline and PubMed up to August 2022.Expert commentary:In general,long-term survival after the reresection of recurrent liver cancer is usually beneficial.SLT has equivalent outcomes to primary liver transplantation for unresectable recurrent illness in a selected group of patients;however,SLT is constrained by the supply of liver grafts.SLT seems to be inferior to repeat liver resection when considering operative and postoperative results but has the major advantage of disease-free survival.When considering the similar overall survival rate and the current situation of donor shortages,repeat liver resection remains an important option for recurrent HCC.