Objective:To systematically review the clinical practice guidelines(CPGs)for the treatment of patients with coronavirus disease 2019(COVID-19)using Chinese herbal medicine(CHM),assess the methodological quality as wel...Objective:To systematically review the clinical practice guidelines(CPGs)for the treatment of patients with coronavirus disease 2019(COVID-19)using Chinese herbal medicine(CHM),assess the methodological quality as well as clinical credibility and implementability of specific recommendations,and summarize key recommendations.Methods:As of April 2022,we conducted a comprehensive search on major electronic databases,guideline websites,academic society websites,and government websites to assess the methodological quality and clinical applicability of the included CPGs using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation(AGREE)II tool and Evaluation-Recommendations EXcellence(AGREE-REX)instructions,respectively.Results:The search yielded 61 CPGs,which were mostly published in 2020;moreover,98.4%of the CPGs were published in China.Only five CPGs achieved a high-quality AGREE II rating;further,six CPGs could be directly recommended,with most of the CPGs still showing much room for improvement.CPGs had a low overall score in the AGREE-REX evaluation,with the domains of clinical applicability,values and preferences,and implementability being standardized in 21.80%±12.56%,16.00%±11.81%,and 31.33%±14.55%of the CPGs,respectively.Five high-quality CPGs mentioned 56 Chinese herbal formulas.Half of the recommendations had moderate or strong evidence level in the GRADE evaluation.The most frequently recommended herbal medicines were Lianhua Qingwen granule/capsule and Jinhua Qinggan granule;however,the strength of recommendation for each prescription varied across CPGs and populations.Conclusions:The overall quality of current CPGs for COVID-19 for CHM still needs to be improved;moreover,the strength of the evidence remains to be standardized across CPGs.展开更多
文摘Objective:To systematically review the clinical practice guidelines(CPGs)for the treatment of patients with coronavirus disease 2019(COVID-19)using Chinese herbal medicine(CHM),assess the methodological quality as well as clinical credibility and implementability of specific recommendations,and summarize key recommendations.Methods:As of April 2022,we conducted a comprehensive search on major electronic databases,guideline websites,academic society websites,and government websites to assess the methodological quality and clinical applicability of the included CPGs using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation(AGREE)II tool and Evaluation-Recommendations EXcellence(AGREE-REX)instructions,respectively.Results:The search yielded 61 CPGs,which were mostly published in 2020;moreover,98.4%of the CPGs were published in China.Only five CPGs achieved a high-quality AGREE II rating;further,six CPGs could be directly recommended,with most of the CPGs still showing much room for improvement.CPGs had a low overall score in the AGREE-REX evaluation,with the domains of clinical applicability,values and preferences,and implementability being standardized in 21.80%±12.56%,16.00%±11.81%,and 31.33%±14.55%of the CPGs,respectively.Five high-quality CPGs mentioned 56 Chinese herbal formulas.Half of the recommendations had moderate or strong evidence level in the GRADE evaluation.The most frequently recommended herbal medicines were Lianhua Qingwen granule/capsule and Jinhua Qinggan granule;however,the strength of recommendation for each prescription varied across CPGs and populations.Conclusions:The overall quality of current CPGs for COVID-19 for CHM still needs to be improved;moreover,the strength of the evidence remains to be standardized across CPGs.
