青少年特发性脊柱侧凸术后快速康复管理方案及效果评价

目的总结青少年特发性脊柱侧凸术后快速康复(enhanced recovery after surgery,ERAS)综合措施,评价其对术后康复的影响。方法2007年1月至2017年1月在北京协和医院骨科住院接受外科矫形治疗的青少年特发性脊柱侧凸患者连续队列中最初100例(第1~100例,传统组)和最后100例(第1193~1292例,ERAS组)患者入选本研究。ERAS组围手术期采用包括术前、术中及术后的快速康复诊疗方案,回顾性比较两组术后康复情况,包括总住院日、术后住院日、异体输血量、出院时疼痛评分、30 d内并发症发生率及1年内非计划再手术发生率。结果两组患者一般临床资料及1年内非计划再手术率无统计学差异,传统组患者的总住院日及术后住院日均显著长于ERAS组[总住院日:传统组(17.18±2.67)d,ERAS组(11.35±1.49)d,P<0.05;术后住院日:传统组(9.34±0.52)d,ERAS组(7.19±0.71)d,P<0.05];传统组异体输血人数及异体红细胞输血量均多于ERAS组[异体输血人数:传统组41%(41/100),ERAS组20%(20/100),P<0.05;异体红细胞输血量:传统组(1.43±0.39)U,ERAS组(0.59±0.12)U,P<0.05];传统组出院时疼痛评分[(3.40±0.63)分]略高于ERAS组[(3.00±0.47)分],但差异无统计学意义。结论青少年特发性脊柱侧凸围手术期实施加速康复诊疗方案,可在不增加患者并发症和非计划再手术发生率的情况下,减少住院时间及输血量,加快患者康复。

Comparing minimally invasive and open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for treatment of degenerative lumbar disease： a meta-analysis

Background Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion （TLIF） through a minimally invasive approach （mTLIF） was introduced to reduce soft tissue injury and speed recovery. Studies with small numbers of patients have been carried out, comparing mTLIF with traditional open TLIF （oTLIF）, but inconsistent outcomes were reported.

Comparison of initial efficacy between single and dual growing rods in treatment of early onset scoliosis

Background Initial results for the use of single and dual growing rod techniques in the treatment of early onset scoliosis （EOS） has been seldom documented. The aim of this research was to investigate the initial efficacy of single and dual growing rods in treatment of EOS. Methods A retrospective study of 25 early onset scoliosis cases treated with growing rod technique between November 2002 and May 2010 was performed, including six cases in the single growing rod group and 19 cases in the dual growing rod group. Operation time, intra-operative bleeding, correction rate, changes in C7-S1 distance, and incidence of complications of the first operation were compared for the two techniques. Results The average post-operative follow-up duration was 31.9 months. There was no statistical difference observed between operation time, intra-operative bleeding, and complication incidence between the single and dual growing rod groups. In addition, no statistical difference was observed in the pre-operative coronal Cobb＇s angle （P 〉0.05）, or in the pre-operative sagittal Cobb＇s angle between both groups （P 〉0.05）. The correction rate of the dual growing rod group was significantly superior to that of the single growing rod group in the coronal plane （P 〈0.01）, but not in the sagittal plane （P 〉0.05）. The C7-S1 distance in the dual growing rod group was significantly larger than that in the single growing rod group （P 〈0.05）. Conclusions The growing rod technique is an effective option for surgical treatment of EOS. The dual growing rod technique shows relative superiority in the correction outcome as compared to the single growing rod technique.

Clinical presentation and surgical treatment of scoliosis in Marfan syndrome

Marfan syndrome （MFS） as an autosomal dominant connective tissue disease is characterized by ocular, cardiovascular, and skeletal deformities including scoliosis. A group of 12 patients with Marfan syndrome associated with scoliosis were surgically treated at our hospital from January 1990 to January 2004.

Humanism and sciences of orthopedics

Ten years have silently passed by since the beginning of the 21st century. Looking back upon the history of