Global prevalence of hepatitis B virus serological markers among healthcare workers:A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND The hepatitis B virus(HBV)infection is a global public health concern that affects about 2 billion people and causes 1 million people deaths yearly.HBV is a bloodborne disease and healthcare workers(HCWs)are a high-risk group because of occupational hazard to patients’blood.Different regions of the world show a highly variable proportion of HCWs infected and/or immunized against HBV.Global data on serologic markers of HBV infection and immunization in HCWs are very important to improve strategies for HBV control.AIM To determine the worldwide prevalence of HBV serological markers among HCWs.METHODS In this systematic review and meta–analyses,we searched PubMed and Excerpta Medica Database(Embase)to identify studies published between 1970 and 2019 on the prevalence of HBV serological markers in HCWs worldwide.We also manually searched for references of relevant articles.Four independent investigators selected studies and included those on the prevalence of each of the HBV serological markers including hepatitis B surface antigen(HBsAg),hepatitis e antigen(HBeAg),immunoglobulin M anti-HBc,and anti-HBs.Methodological quality of eligible studies was assessed and random-effect model meta-analysis resulted in the pooled prevalence of HBV serological markers HBV infection in HCWs.Heterogeneity(I²)was assessed using theχ²test on Cochran’s Q statistic and H parameters.Heterogeneity’sources were explored through subgroup and metaregression analyses.This study is registered with PROSPERO,number CRD42019137144.RESULTS We reviewed 14059 references,out of which 227 studies corresponding to 448 prevalence data among HCWs(224936 HCWs recruited from 1964 to 2019 in 71 countries)were included in this meta-analysis.The pooled seroprevalences of current HBsAg,current HBeAg,and acute HBV infection among HCWs were 2.3%[95% confidence interval(CI):1.9-2.7],0.2%(95%CI:0.0-1.7),and 5.3%(95%CI:1.4-11.2),respectively.The pooled seroprevalences of total immunity against HBV and immunity acquired by natural HBV infection in HCWs were 56.6%(95%CI:48.7-63.4)and 9.2%(95%CI:6.8-11.8),respectively.HBV infection was more prevalent in HCWs in low-income countries,particularly in Africa.The highest immunization rates against HBV in HCWs were recorded in urban areas and in high-income countries including Europe,the Eastern Mediterranean and the Western Pacific.CONCLUSION New strategies are needed to improve awareness,training,screening,vaccination,post-exposure management and treatment of HBV infection in HCWs,and particularly in low-income regions.

Global prevalence of occult hepatitis C virus: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND Occult hepatitis C infection(OCI)is characterized by the presence of hepatitis C virus(HCV)RNA in the liver,peripheral blood mononuclear cells(PBMC)and/or ultracentrifuged serum in the absence of detectable HCV-RNA in serum.OCI has been described in several categories of populations including hemodialysis patients,patients with a sustained virological response,immunocompromised individuals,patients with abnormal hepatic function,and apparently healthy subjects.AIM To highlight the global prevalence of OCI.METHODS We performed a systematic and comprehensive literature search in the following 4 electronic databases PubMed,EMBASE,Global Index Medicus,and Web of Science up to 6th May 2021 to retrieve relevant studies published in the field.Included studies were unrestricted population categories with known RNA status in serum,PBMC,liver tissue and/or ultracentrifuged serum.Data were extracted independently by each author and the Hoy et al tool was used to assess the quality of the included studies.We used the random-effect meta-analysis model to estimate the proportions of OCI and their 95%confidence intervals(95%CI).The Cochran's Q-test and the I2 test statistics were used to assess heterogeneity between studies.Funnel plot and Egger test were used to examine publication bias.R software version 4.1.0 was used for all analyses.RESULTS The electronic search resulted in 3950 articles.We obtained 102 prevalence data from 85 included studies.The pooled prevalence of seronegative OCI was estimated to be 9.61%(95%CI:6.84-12.73)with substantial heterogeneity[I^(2)=94.7%(95%CI:93.8%-95.4%),P<0.0001].Seropositive OCI prevalence was estimated to be 13.39%(95%CI:7.85-19.99)with substantial heterogeneity[I^(2)=93.0%(90.8%-94.7%)].Higher seronegative OCI prevalence was found in Southern Europe and Northern Africa,and in patients with abnormal liver function,hematological disorders,and kidney diseases.Higher seropositive OCI prevalence was found in Southern Europe,Northern America,and Northern Africa.CONCLUSION In conclusion,in the present study,it appears that the burden of OCI is high and variable across the different regions and population categories.Further studies on OCI are needed to assess the transmissibility,clinical significance,long-term outcome,and need for treatment.