Molecular mechanism of glucocorticoid resistance in inflammatory bowel disease

Natural and synthetic glucocorticoids (GCs) are widely employed in a number of inflammatory, autoimmune and neoplastic diseases, and, despite the introduction of novel therapies, remain the first-line treatment for inducing remission in moderate to severe active Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis. Despite their extensive therapeutic use and the proven effectiveness, considerable clinical evidence of wide inter-individual differences in GC efficacy among patients has been reported, in particular when these agents are used in inflammatory diseases. In recent years, a detailed knowledge of the GC mechanism of action and of the genetic variants affecting GC activity at the molecular level has arisen from several studies. GCs interact with their cytoplasmic receptor, and are able to repress inflammatory gene expression through several distinct mechanisms. The glucocorticoid receptor (GR) is therefore crucial for the effects of these agents: mutations in the GR gene (NR3C1, nuclear receptor subfamily 3, group C, member 1) are the primary cause of a rare, inherited form of GC resistance; in addition, several polymorphisms of this gene have been described and associated with GC response and toxicity.However, the GR is not self-standing in the cell and the receptor-mediated functions are the result of a complex interplay of GR and many other cellular partners. The latter comprise several chaperonins of the large cooperative hetero-oligomeric complex that binds the hormonefree GR in the cytosol, and several factors involved in the transcriptional machinery and chromatin remodeling, that are critical for the hormonal control of target genes transcription in the nucleus. Furthermore, variants in the principal effectors of GCs (e.g. cytokines and their regulators) have also to be taken into account for a comprehensive evaluation of the variability in GC response. Polymorphisms in genes involved in the transport and/or metabolism of these hormones have also been suggested as other possible candidates of interest that could play a role in the observed inter-individual differences in efficacy and toxicity. The best-characterized example is the drug efflux pump P-glycoprotein, a membrane transporter that extrudes GCs from cells, thereby lowering their intracellular concentration. This protein is encoded by the ABCB1/ MDR1 gene; this gene presents different known polymorphic sites that can influence its expression and function. This editorial reviews the current knowledge on this topic and underlines the role of genetics in predicting GC clinical response. The ambitious goal of pharmacogenomic studies is to adapt therapies to a patient’s specific genetic background, thus improving on efficacy and safety rates.

Pharmacogenetics of azathioprine in inflammatory bowel disease: A role for glutathione-S-transferase?

Azathioprine is a purine antimetabolite drug commonly used to treat inflammatory bowel disease(IBD).In vivo it is active after reaction with reduced glutathione(GSH)and conversion to mercaptopurine.Although this reaction may occur spontaneously,the presence of isoforms M and A of the enzyme glutathione-S-transferase(GST)may increase its speed.Indeed,in pediatric patients with IBD,deletion of GST-M1,which determines reduced enzymatic activity,was recently associated with reduced sensitivity to azathioprine and reduced production of azathioprine active metabolites.In addition to increase the activation of azathioprine to mercaptopurine,GSTs may contribute to azathioprine effects even by modulating GSH consumption,oxidative stress and apoptosis.Therefore,genetic polymorphisms in genes for GSTs may be useful to predict response to azathioprine even if more in vitro and clinical validation studies are needed.reserved.

Biomarkers for gastrointestinal adverse events related to thiopurine therapy

Thiopurines are immunomodulators used in the treatment of acute lymphoblastic leukemia and inflammatory bowel diseases.Adverse reactions to these agents are one of the main causes of treatment discontinuation or interruption.Myelosuppression is the most frequent adverse effect;however,approximately 5%-20%of patients develop gastrointestinal toxicity.The identification of biomarkers able to prevent and/or monitor these adverse reactions would be useful for clinicians for the proactive management of long-term thiopurine therapy.In this editorial,we discuss evidence supporting the use of PACSIN2,RAC1,and ITPA genes,in addition to TPMT and NUDT15,as possible biomarkers for thiopurine-related gastrointestinal toxicity.

Pharmacogenetics of thiopurines

Polychemotherapeutic protocols for the treatment of pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia(ALL)always include thiopurines.Specific approaches vary in terms of drugs,dosages and combinations.Such therapeutic schemes,including risk-adapted intensity,have been extremely successful for children with ALL who have reached an outstanding 5-year survival of greater than 90%in developed countries.Innovative drugs such as the proteasome inhibitor bortezomib and the bi-specific T cell engager blinatumomab are available to further improve therapeutic outcomes.Nevertheless,daily oral thiopurines remain the backbone maintenance or continuation therapy.Pharmacogenetics allows the personalization of thiopurine therapy in pediatric ALL and clinical guidelines to tailor therapy on the basis of genetic variants in TPMT and NUDT15 genes are already available.Other genes of interest,such as ITPA and PACSIN2,have been implicated in interindividual variability in thiopurines efficacy and adverse effects and need additional research to be implemented in clinical protocols.In this review we will discuss current literature and clinical guidelines available to implement pharmacogenetics for tailoring therapy with thiopurines in pediatric ALL.