Cassava productivity is hampered by pests and diseases including cassava<span style="font-family:;" "=""><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> mosaic disease (CMD) and cass...Cassava productivity is hampered by pests and diseases including cassava<span style="font-family:;" "=""><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> mosaic disease (CMD) and cassava brown streak disease (CBSD).</span><b> </b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">The main ob</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">jective of this study was to identify stable superior genotypes that combine</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> dis</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">ease resistance and high yield. Sixteen cassava genotypes were planted in a</span> <span style="font-family:Verdana;">randomized complete block design with three replications for six planting </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">seasons (years) at five sites in Tanzania. The genotypes were assessed using the additive main effect and multiplicative interaction (AMMI) analysis, and highly significant (</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">P </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">< 0.001) effects of genotype, environment, and genotype-</span><span style="font-family:;" "=""><span style="font-family:Verdana;">by-environment (</span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">G</span><sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;">*</span></sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;">E</span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">) interactions were observed for all traits studied. Per</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">cent sum of squares (SS) due to environment (12.66% - 85.23%) was the</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> highest followed by </span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">G</span><sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;">*</span></sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;">E</span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> (14.12% - 39.56%) for CMD foliar symptoms, root weight and dry matter. On the other hand, % SS due to genotype (52.14% - 69.14%) </span><span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">was highest followed by </span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">G</span><sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;">*</span></sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;">E</span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> (26.14% - 35.91%) for CBSD foliar and root</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> symptoms indicating that the environment and </span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">G</span><sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;">*</span></sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;">E</span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> greatly influenced trait expression. The most stable genotypes which combined disease resistance and high yield were NDL 2003/31 and NDL 2003/111. The findings of this study will give impetus for the release of new cassava varieties that are not only high yielding but are also dually resistant to both CMD and CBSD in different locations and sites.</span></span>展开更多
文摘Cassava productivity is hampered by pests and diseases including cassava<span style="font-family:;" "=""><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> mosaic disease (CMD) and cassava brown streak disease (CBSD).</span><b> </b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">The main ob</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">jective of this study was to identify stable superior genotypes that combine</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> dis</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">ease resistance and high yield. Sixteen cassava genotypes were planted in a</span> <span style="font-family:Verdana;">randomized complete block design with three replications for six planting </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">seasons (years) at five sites in Tanzania. The genotypes were assessed using the additive main effect and multiplicative interaction (AMMI) analysis, and highly significant (</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">P </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">< 0.001) effects of genotype, environment, and genotype-</span><span style="font-family:;" "=""><span style="font-family:Verdana;">by-environment (</span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">G</span><sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;">*</span></sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;">E</span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">) interactions were observed for all traits studied. Per</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">cent sum of squares (SS) due to environment (12.66% - 85.23%) was the</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> highest followed by </span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">G</span><sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;">*</span></sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;">E</span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> (14.12% - 39.56%) for CMD foliar symptoms, root weight and dry matter. On the other hand, % SS due to genotype (52.14% - 69.14%) </span><span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">was highest followed by </span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">G</span><sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;">*</span></sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;">E</span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> (26.14% - 35.91%) for CBSD foliar and root</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> symptoms indicating that the environment and </span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">G</span><sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;">*</span></sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;">E</span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> greatly influenced trait expression. The most stable genotypes which combined disease resistance and high yield were NDL 2003/31 and NDL 2003/111. The findings of this study will give impetus for the release of new cassava varieties that are not only high yielding but are also dually resistant to both CMD and CBSD in different locations and sites.</span></span>