Background and purpose An analysis of the ASTER 2 trial revealed similar final recanalisation levels and clinical outcomes in acute large vessel occlusion(LVO)stroke between stent retrieval(SR)alone as a first-line me...Background and purpose An analysis of the ASTER 2 trial revealed similar final recanalisation levels and clinical outcomes in acute large vessel occlusion(LVO)stroke between stent retrieval(SR)alone as a first-line mechanical thrombectomy(MT)technique(SR alone first-line)and concomitant use of contact aspiration(CA)plus SR as a first-line MT technique(SR+CA first-line).The purpose of the present study was to compare the safety and efficacy of SR+CA first-line with those of SR alone first-line for patients with LVO in China.Methods We conducted the present study by using the data from the ANGEL-ACT registry.We divided the selected patients into SR+CA first-line and SR alone first-line groups.We performed logistic regression and generalised linear models with adjustments to compare the angiographic and clinical outcomes,including successful/complete recanalisation after the first technique alone and all procedures,first-pass successful/complete recanalisation,number of passes,90-day modified Rankin Scale,procedure duration,rescue treatment and intracranial haemorrhage within 24 hours.Results Of the 1233 enrolled patients,1069(86.7%)received SR alone first-line,and 164(13.3%)received SR+CA first-line.SR+CA first-line was associated with more thrombectomy passes(3(2-4)vs 2(1-2);β=1.77,95%CI=1.55 to 1.99,p<0.001),and longer procedure duration(86(60-129)min vs 80(50-122)min;β=10.76,95%CI=1.08 to 20.43,p=0.029)than SR alone first-line group.Other outcomes were comparable(all p>0.05)between the two groups.Conclusions Patients undergoing SR+CA first-line had more thrombectomy passes and longer procedure duration than patients undergoing SR alone first-line.Additionally,we suggested that SR+CA first-line was not superior to SR alone first-line in final recanalisation level,first-pass recanalisation level and 90-day clinical outcomes in the Chinese population.展开更多
Objectives To investigate the safety and efficacy of endovascular treatment(EVT)for acute medium vessel occlusion(MeVO)in the anterior circulation and to explore the independent predictors of the 90-day good outcome f...Objectives To investigate the safety and efficacy of endovascular treatment(EVT)for acute medium vessel occlusion(MeVO)in the anterior circulation and to explore the independent predictors of the 90-day good outcome for such patients.Methods Data from ANGEL-ACT Registry were analysed in our study.The outcomes,such as the modified Rankin Scale(mRS)at 90 days,successful recanalisation rate and symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage(SICH)rate,were compared between MeVO and acute large vessel occlusions(LVO).Then,the independent predictors of the good outcome at 90 days in MeVO patients were determined by the logistic regression analyses.Results We included 1032 subjects in the analysis,of which,147 were MeVO and 885 were LVO.mRS at 90 days distribution(3(0-4)vs 3(0-5),common odds ratio(OR)=1.00,95%confidence interval(CI)0.73 to 1.38,p=0.994),SICH rate(4.8%vs 8.9%;OR=0.59,95%CI 0.26 to 1.34,p=0.205)and successful recanalisation rate(89.8%vs 89.7%;OR=1.0095%CI 0.51 to 1.93,p=0.992)were similar between the MeVO and LVO groups after adjusting for the confounders.We identified that baseline neutrophil-to lymphocyte ratio≤4.1(OR=2.13,95%CI 1.14 to 3.99,p=0.019),baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale≤14(OR=1.96,95%CI 1.02 to 3.80,p=0.045)and mechanical thrombectomy passes≤1(OR=2.16,95%CI 1.14 to 4.11,p=0.021)were independent predictors of the 90-day good outcome in MeVO patients undergoing EVT.Conclusions Patients with MeVO achieved similar 90-day mRS,SICH rate and successful recanalisation rate after EVT compared with patients with LVO.Several independent predictors of 90-day good outcome in MeVO patients undergoing EVT were determined,which should be highly considered in MeVO stroke management.展开更多
Background:Our aim was to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of the automated computer-based Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score(e-ASPECTS)for acute stroke patients and compare the result with physicians at di...Background:Our aim was to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of the automated computer-based Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score(e-ASPECTS)for acute stroke patients and compare the result with physicians at different levels.Methods:In our center,e-ASPECTS and 9 physicians at different levels retrospectively and blindly assessed baseline computed tomography(CT)images of 55 patients.Sensitivity,specificity,receiver-operating characteristic curves,Bland–Altman plots with mean score error,and Matthews correlation coefficients were calculated.Comparisons were made between the scores by physicians and e-ASPECTS with diffusion-weighted imaging(DWI)being the ground truth.Two methods for clustered data were used to estimate sensitivity and specificity in the region-based analysis.Results:In total,1100(55 patients×20 regions per patient)ASPECTS regions were scored.In the region-based analysis,sensitivity of e-ASPECTS was better than junior doctors and residents(0.576 vs 0.165 and 0.111,p<0.05)but inferior to senior doctors(0.576 vs 0.617).Specificity was lower than junior doctors and residents(0.883 vs 0.971 and 0.914)but higher than senior doctors(0.883 vs 0.809,p<0.05).E-ASPECTS had the best Matthews correlation coefficient of 0.529,compared to senior doctors,junior doctors,and residents(0.463,0.251,and 0.087,respectively).Conclusions:e-ASPECTS showed a similar performance to that of senior physicians in the assessment of brain CT of acute ischemic stroke patients with the Alberta Stroke Program Early CT score method.展开更多
Background and purpose To investigate the safety and efficacy of oral antiplatelet therapy(APT)for patients who had acute ischaemic stroke(AIS),receiving endovascular therapy(EVT).Methods Patients were divided into no...Background and purpose To investigate the safety and efficacy of oral antiplatelet therapy(APT)for patients who had acute ischaemic stroke(AIS),receiving endovascular therapy(EVT).Methods Patients were divided into non-APT group and APT(single APT or dual APT(DAPT)group.The safety and efficacy endpoints at 3-month follow-up were symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage(sICH),recanalisation rate,clinical outcome and mortality.Results Among 915 patients who had AIS,those in APT group(n=199)showed shorter puncture-to recanalisation time,lower frequency of intravenous thrombolysis and more use of tirofiban compared with those in non-antiplatelet group(n=716)(p<0.05 for all).Oral APT was found to be associated with superior clinical outcome compared with non-APT(APT(44.2%)versus non-APT(41.1%)),adjusted OR=2.605,95% CI 1.244 to 5.455,p=0.011).DAPT showed superior clinical outcome compared with non-APT(DAPT(56.5%)versus non-APT(41.1%),adjusted OR=5.405,95% CI 1.614 to 18.102,p=0.006)and lower risk of mortality at 3-month follow-up(DAPT(4.8%)versus non-DAPT(17.7%),adjusted OR=0.008,95%CI 0.000 to 0.441,p=0.019).There was no significant difference in sICH between the two groups.Conclusions Oral APT prior to undergoing EVT is safe and may accompany with superior clinical outcomes.DAPT may associate with superior clinical outcomes and lower risk of mortality.展开更多
基金funded by the National Key Research and Development Program of China(grant number 2016YFC1301500).
文摘Background and purpose An analysis of the ASTER 2 trial revealed similar final recanalisation levels and clinical outcomes in acute large vessel occlusion(LVO)stroke between stent retrieval(SR)alone as a first-line mechanical thrombectomy(MT)technique(SR alone first-line)and concomitant use of contact aspiration(CA)plus SR as a first-line MT technique(SR+CA first-line).The purpose of the present study was to compare the safety and efficacy of SR+CA first-line with those of SR alone first-line for patients with LVO in China.Methods We conducted the present study by using the data from the ANGEL-ACT registry.We divided the selected patients into SR+CA first-line and SR alone first-line groups.We performed logistic regression and generalised linear models with adjustments to compare the angiographic and clinical outcomes,including successful/complete recanalisation after the first technique alone and all procedures,first-pass successful/complete recanalisation,number of passes,90-day modified Rankin Scale,procedure duration,rescue treatment and intracranial haemorrhage within 24 hours.Results Of the 1233 enrolled patients,1069(86.7%)received SR alone first-line,and 164(13.3%)received SR+CA first-line.SR+CA first-line was associated with more thrombectomy passes(3(2-4)vs 2(1-2);β=1.77,95%CI=1.55 to 1.99,p<0.001),and longer procedure duration(86(60-129)min vs 80(50-122)min;β=10.76,95%CI=1.08 to 20.43,p=0.029)than SR alone first-line group.Other outcomes were comparable(all p>0.05)between the two groups.Conclusions Patients undergoing SR+CA first-line had more thrombectomy passes and longer procedure duration than patients undergoing SR alone first-line.Additionally,we suggested that SR+CA first-line was not superior to SR alone first-line in final recanalisation level,first-pass recanalisation level and 90-day clinical outcomes in the Chinese population.
基金the National Key Research and Development Program of China,grant number 2016YFC1301500.
文摘Objectives To investigate the safety and efficacy of endovascular treatment(EVT)for acute medium vessel occlusion(MeVO)in the anterior circulation and to explore the independent predictors of the 90-day good outcome for such patients.Methods Data from ANGEL-ACT Registry were analysed in our study.The outcomes,such as the modified Rankin Scale(mRS)at 90 days,successful recanalisation rate and symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage(SICH)rate,were compared between MeVO and acute large vessel occlusions(LVO).Then,the independent predictors of the good outcome at 90 days in MeVO patients were determined by the logistic regression analyses.Results We included 1032 subjects in the analysis,of which,147 were MeVO and 885 were LVO.mRS at 90 days distribution(3(0-4)vs 3(0-5),common odds ratio(OR)=1.00,95%confidence interval(CI)0.73 to 1.38,p=0.994),SICH rate(4.8%vs 8.9%;OR=0.59,95%CI 0.26 to 1.34,p=0.205)and successful recanalisation rate(89.8%vs 89.7%;OR=1.0095%CI 0.51 to 1.93,p=0.992)were similar between the MeVO and LVO groups after adjusting for the confounders.We identified that baseline neutrophil-to lymphocyte ratio≤4.1(OR=2.13,95%CI 1.14 to 3.99,p=0.019),baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale≤14(OR=1.96,95%CI 1.02 to 3.80,p=0.045)and mechanical thrombectomy passes≤1(OR=2.16,95%CI 1.14 to 4.11,p=0.021)were independent predictors of the 90-day good outcome in MeVO patients undergoing EVT.Conclusions Patients with MeVO achieved similar 90-day mRS,SICH rate and successful recanalisation rate after EVT compared with patients with LVO.Several independent predictors of 90-day good outcome in MeVO patients undergoing EVT were determined,which should be highly considered in MeVO stroke management.
基金supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China(2016YFC1301500)Beijing Hospitals Authority Youth Programme(QML20170502)China Postdoctoral Science Foundation(2020-YJ-008).
文摘Background:Our aim was to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of the automated computer-based Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score(e-ASPECTS)for acute stroke patients and compare the result with physicians at different levels.Methods:In our center,e-ASPECTS and 9 physicians at different levels retrospectively and blindly assessed baseline computed tomography(CT)images of 55 patients.Sensitivity,specificity,receiver-operating characteristic curves,Bland–Altman plots with mean score error,and Matthews correlation coefficients were calculated.Comparisons were made between the scores by physicians and e-ASPECTS with diffusion-weighted imaging(DWI)being the ground truth.Two methods for clustered data were used to estimate sensitivity and specificity in the region-based analysis.Results:In total,1100(55 patients×20 regions per patient)ASPECTS regions were scored.In the region-based analysis,sensitivity of e-ASPECTS was better than junior doctors and residents(0.576 vs 0.165 and 0.111,p<0.05)but inferior to senior doctors(0.576 vs 0.617).Specificity was lower than junior doctors and residents(0.883 vs 0.971 and 0.914)but higher than senior doctors(0.883 vs 0.809,p<0.05).E-ASPECTS had the best Matthews correlation coefficient of 0.529,compared to senior doctors,junior doctors,and residents(0.463,0.251,and 0.087,respectively).Conclusions:e-ASPECTS showed a similar performance to that of senior physicians in the assessment of brain CT of acute ischemic stroke patients with the Alberta Stroke Program Early CT score method.
基金Study funded by the National Key Research and Development Program of China,grant number 2016YFC1301500.
文摘Background and purpose To investigate the safety and efficacy of oral antiplatelet therapy(APT)for patients who had acute ischaemic stroke(AIS),receiving endovascular therapy(EVT).Methods Patients were divided into non-APT group and APT(single APT or dual APT(DAPT)group.The safety and efficacy endpoints at 3-month follow-up were symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage(sICH),recanalisation rate,clinical outcome and mortality.Results Among 915 patients who had AIS,those in APT group(n=199)showed shorter puncture-to recanalisation time,lower frequency of intravenous thrombolysis and more use of tirofiban compared with those in non-antiplatelet group(n=716)(p<0.05 for all).Oral APT was found to be associated with superior clinical outcome compared with non-APT(APT(44.2%)versus non-APT(41.1%)),adjusted OR=2.605,95% CI 1.244 to 5.455,p=0.011).DAPT showed superior clinical outcome compared with non-APT(DAPT(56.5%)versus non-APT(41.1%),adjusted OR=5.405,95% CI 1.614 to 18.102,p=0.006)and lower risk of mortality at 3-month follow-up(DAPT(4.8%)versus non-DAPT(17.7%),adjusted OR=0.008,95%CI 0.000 to 0.441,p=0.019).There was no significant difference in sICH between the two groups.Conclusions Oral APT prior to undergoing EVT is safe and may accompany with superior clinical outcomes.DAPT may associate with superior clinical outcomes and lower risk of mortality.