This is a retrospective cohort study comparing blastocyst transfer outcomes following intracytoplasmic sperm injection utilizing epididymal versus testicular sperm for men with obstructive azoospermia.All cases at a s...This is a retrospective cohort study comparing blastocyst transfer outcomes following intracytoplasmic sperm injection utilizing epididymal versus testicular sperm for men with obstructive azoospermia.All cases at a single center between 2012 and 2016 were included.Operative approach was selected at the surgeon’s discretion and included microepididymal sperm aspiration or testicular sperm extraction.Blastocyst culture was exclusively utilized prior to transfer.The primary outcome was live birth rate.Secondary outcomes included fertilization rate,blastulation rate,euploidy rate,and implantation rate.A mixed effects model was performed.Seventy-six microepididymal sperm aspiration cases and 93 testicular sperm extraction cases were analyzed.The live birth rate was equivalent(48.6%vs 50.5%,P=0.77).However,on mixed effects model,epididymal sperm resulted in a greater likelihood of fertilization(adjusted OR:1.37,95%CI:1.05–1.81,P=0.02)and produced a higher blastulation rate(adjusted OR:1.41,95%CI:1.1–1.85,P=0.01).As a result,the epididymal sperm group had more supernumerary blastocysts available(4.3 vs 3,P<0.05).The euploidy rate was no different.Pregnancy rates were no different through the first transfer cycle.However,intracytoplasmic sperm injection following microepididymal sperm aspiration resulted in a greater number of usable blastocysts per patient.Thus,the true benefit of epididymal sperm may only be demonstrated via a comparison of cumulative pregnancy rates after multiple transfers from one cohort.展开更多
Many azoospermic men do not possess mature spermatozoa at the time of surgical sperm extraction.This study is a systematic review and meta-analysis evaluating outcomes following round spermatid injection(ROSI),a techn...Many azoospermic men do not possess mature spermatozoa at the time of surgical sperm extraction.This study is a systematic review and meta-analysis evaluating outcomes following round spermatid injection(ROSI),a technique which utilizes immature precursors of spermatozoa for fertilization.An electronic search was performed to identify relevant articles published through October 2018.Human cohort studies in English involving male patients who had round spermatids identified and used for fertilization with human oocytes were included.Fertilization rate,pregnancy rate,and resultant delivery rate were assessed following ROSI.Meta-analysis outcomes were analyzed using a random-effects model.Data were extracted from 22 studies involving 1099 couples and 4218 embryo transfers.The fertilization rate after ROSI was 38.7%(95%confidence interval[CI]:31.5%–46.3%),while the pregnancy rate was 3.7%(95%CI:3.2%–4.4%).The resultant delivery rate was low,with 4.3%of embryo transfers resulting in a delivery(95%CI:2.3%–7.7%).The pregnancy rate per couple was 13.4%(95%CI:6.8%–19.1%)and the resultant delivery rate per couple was 8.1%(95%CI:6.1%–14.4%).ROSI has resulted in clinical pregnancies and live births,but success rates are considerably lower than those achieved with mature spermatozoa.While this technique may be a feasible alternative for men with azoospermia who decline other options,couples should be aware that the odds of a successful delivery are greatly diminished and the prognosis is relatively poor.展开更多
文摘This is a retrospective cohort study comparing blastocyst transfer outcomes following intracytoplasmic sperm injection utilizing epididymal versus testicular sperm for men with obstructive azoospermia.All cases at a single center between 2012 and 2016 were included.Operative approach was selected at the surgeon’s discretion and included microepididymal sperm aspiration or testicular sperm extraction.Blastocyst culture was exclusively utilized prior to transfer.The primary outcome was live birth rate.Secondary outcomes included fertilization rate,blastulation rate,euploidy rate,and implantation rate.A mixed effects model was performed.Seventy-six microepididymal sperm aspiration cases and 93 testicular sperm extraction cases were analyzed.The live birth rate was equivalent(48.6%vs 50.5%,P=0.77).However,on mixed effects model,epididymal sperm resulted in a greater likelihood of fertilization(adjusted OR:1.37,95%CI:1.05–1.81,P=0.02)and produced a higher blastulation rate(adjusted OR:1.41,95%CI:1.1–1.85,P=0.01).As a result,the epididymal sperm group had more supernumerary blastocysts available(4.3 vs 3,P<0.05).The euploidy rate was no different.Pregnancy rates were no different through the first transfer cycle.However,intracytoplasmic sperm injection following microepididymal sperm aspiration resulted in a greater number of usable blastocysts per patient.Thus,the true benefit of epididymal sperm may only be demonstrated via a comparison of cumulative pregnancy rates after multiple transfers from one cohort.
文摘Many azoospermic men do not possess mature spermatozoa at the time of surgical sperm extraction.This study is a systematic review and meta-analysis evaluating outcomes following round spermatid injection(ROSI),a technique which utilizes immature precursors of spermatozoa for fertilization.An electronic search was performed to identify relevant articles published through October 2018.Human cohort studies in English involving male patients who had round spermatids identified and used for fertilization with human oocytes were included.Fertilization rate,pregnancy rate,and resultant delivery rate were assessed following ROSI.Meta-analysis outcomes were analyzed using a random-effects model.Data were extracted from 22 studies involving 1099 couples and 4218 embryo transfers.The fertilization rate after ROSI was 38.7%(95%confidence interval[CI]:31.5%–46.3%),while the pregnancy rate was 3.7%(95%CI:3.2%–4.4%).The resultant delivery rate was low,with 4.3%of embryo transfers resulting in a delivery(95%CI:2.3%–7.7%).The pregnancy rate per couple was 13.4%(95%CI:6.8%–19.1%)and the resultant delivery rate per couple was 8.1%(95%CI:6.1%–14.4%).ROSI has resulted in clinical pregnancies and live births,but success rates are considerably lower than those achieved with mature spermatozoa.While this technique may be a feasible alternative for men with azoospermia who decline other options,couples should be aware that the odds of a successful delivery are greatly diminished and the prognosis is relatively poor.