De novo malignancies after liver transplantation: The effect of immunosuppression-personal data and review of literature

BACKGROUND Immunosuppression has undoubtedly raised the overall positive outcomes in the post-operative management of solid organ transplantation. However, long-term exposure to immunosuppression is associated with critical systemic morbidities. De novo malignancies following orthotopic liver transplants (OLTs) are a serious threat in pediatric and adult transplant individuals. Data from different experiences were reported and compared to assess the connection between immunosuppression and de novo malignancies in liver transplant patients. AIM To study the role of immunosuppression on the incidence of de novo malignancies in liver transplant recipients. METHODS A systematic literature examination about de novo malignancies and immunosuppression weaning in adult and pediatric OLT recipients was described in the present review. Worldwide data were collected from highly qualified institutions performing OLTs. Patient follow-up, immunosuppression discontinuation and incidence of de novo malignancies were reported. Likewise, the review assesses the differences in adult and pediatric recipients by describing the adopted immunosuppression regimens and the different type of diagnosed solid and blood malignancy.RESULTS Emerging evidence suggests that the liver is an immunologically privileged organ able to support immunosuppression discontinuation in carefully selected recipients. Malignancies are often detected in liver transplant patients undergoing daily immunosuppression regimens. Post-transplant lymphoproliferative diseases and skin tumors are the most detected de novo malignancies in the pediatric and adult OLT population, respectively. To date, immunosuppression withdrawal has been achieved in up to 40% and 60% of well-selected adult and pediatric recipients, respectively. In both populations, a clear benefit of immunosuppression weaning protocols on de novo malignancies is difficult to ascertain because data have not been specified in most of the clinical experiences. CONCLUSION The selected populations of tolerant pediatric and adult liver transplant recipients greatly benefit from immunosuppression weaning. There is still no strong clinical evidence on the usefulness of immunosuppression withdrawal in OLT recipients on malignancies. An interesting focus is represented by the complete reconstitution of the immunological pathways that could help in decreasing the incidence of de novo malignancies and may also help in treating liver transplant patients suffering from cancer.

Chronic rejection after liver transplantation:Opening the Pandora’s box

Chronic rejection(CR)of liver allografts causes damage to intrahepatic vessels and bile ducts and may lead to graft failure after liver transplantation.Although its prevalence has declined steadily with the introduction of potent immunosuppressive therapy,CR still represents an important cause of graft injury,which might be irreversible,leading to graft loss requiring re-transplantation.To date,we still do not fully appreciate the mechanisms underlying this process.In addition to T cell-mediated CR,which was initially the only recognized type of CR,recently a new form of liver allograft CR,antibody-mediated CR,has been identified.This has indeed opened an era of thriving research and renewed interest in the field.Liver biopsy is needed for a definitive diagnosis of CR,but current research is aiming to identify new non-invasive tools for predicting patients at risk for CR after liver transplantation.Moreover,the minimization or withdrawal of immunosuppressive therapy might influence the establishment of subclinical CR-related injury,which should not be disregarded.Therapies for CR may only be effective in the“early”phases,and a tailored management of the immunosuppression regimen is essential for preventing irreversible liver damage.Herein,we provide an overview of the current knowledge and research on CR,focusing on early detection,identification of non-invasive biomarkers,immunosuppressive management,re-transplantation and future perspectives of CR.

Moving forward in the treatment of cholangiocarcinoma

Despite being the second most frequent primary liver tumor in humans,early diagnosis and treatment of cholangiocarcinoma(CCA)are still unsatisfactory.In fact,survival after 5 years is expected in less than one fourth of patients diagnosed with this disease.Rare incidence,late appearance of symptoms and heterogeneous biology are all factors contributing to our limited knowledge of this cancer and determining its poor prognosis in the clinical setting.Several efforts have been made in the last decades in order to achieve an improved classification/understanding with regard to the diverse CCA forms.Location within the biliary tree has helped to distinguish between intrahepatic,perihilar and distal CCA types.Sequence analysis contributed to identifying several characteristic genetic aberrations in CCA that may also serve as possible targets for therapy.Novel findings are expected to significantly improve the management of this malignancy in the near future.In this changing scenario our review focuses on the current and future strategies for CCA treatment.Both systemic and surgical treatments are discussed in detail.The results of the main studies in this field are reported,together with the ongoing trials.The current findings suggest that an integrated multidisciplinary approach to this malignancy would be helpful to improve its outcome.

Impact of immunosuppression minimization and withdrawal in long-term hepatitis C virus liver transplant recipients

AIM:To investigate the effects of different immunosuppressive regimens and avoidance on fibrosis progression in hepatitis C virus(HCV)liver transplant(LT)recipients.METHODS:We retrospectively compared the liver biopsies of well-matched HCV LT recipients under calcineurin inhibitors(CNI group,n=21)and mycophenolate(MMF group,n=15)monotherapy,with those patients who successfully withdrawn immunosuppression(IS)therapy from at least 3 years(TOL group,n=10).To perform the well-matched analysis,all HCV transplanted patients from December 1993 were screened.Only those HCV patients who reached the following criteria were considered for the analysis:(1)at least3 years of post-operative follow-up;(2)patients with normal liver graft function under low dose CNI monotherapy(CNI group);(3)patients with normal liver graft function under antimetabolite(Micophenolate Mofetil or coated mycophenolate sodium)monotherapy(MMF group);and(4)recipients with normal liver function without any IS.We excluded from the analysis recipients who were IS free or under monotherapy for<36 mo,recipients with cirrhosis or with unstable liver function tests.RESULTS:Thirty six recipients were enrolled in the study.Demographics,clinical data,time after LT and baseline liver biopsies were comparable in the three groups.After six years of follow-up,there was no worsening of hepatic fibrosis in the MMF group(2.5±1.5Ishak Units vs 2.9±1.7 Ishak Units,P=0.5)and TOL group(2.7±10.7 vs 2.5±1.2,P=0.2).In contrast,a significant increase in the fibrosis score was observed in the CNI group(2.2±1.7 vs 3.9±1.6,P=0.008).The yearly fibrosis progression rate was significantly worse in the CNI group(0.32±0.35)vs MMF group(0.03±0.31,P=0.03),and TOL group(-0.02±0.27,P=0.02).No differences have been reported in grading scores for CNI group(2.79±1.9,P=0.7),MMF group(3.2±1.5,P=0.9)and TOL group(3.1±1.4,P=0.2).Twenty four patients were treated with low dose ribavirin(8TOL,7 MMF,9 CNI).The hepatitis C titers were comparable in the three groups.No episodes of rejection have been reported despite differences of liver function test in the three groups during the observational period.CONCLUSION:IS withdrawal and MMF monotherapy is safe and seems to be associated with the slowest fibrosis progression in HCV LT recipients.

Hepatitis B virus recurrence after liver transplantation: An old tale or a clear and present danger?

Hepatitis B virus(HBV) recurrence after liver transplantation(LT) has been described more than 50 years ago. Similarly, to other clinical conditions, in which impairment of host immune defense favors viral replication, early reports described in details recurrence and reactivation of HBV in liver transplant recipients. The evidence of a possible, severe, clinical evolution of HBV reappearance in a significant percentage of these patients, allowed to consider,for some years, HBV positivity a contraindication for LT. Moving from the old to the new millennium this picture has changed dramatically. Several studies contributed to establish efficient prophylactic protocols for HBV recurrence and with the advent of more potent anti-viral drugs an increased control of infection was achieved in transplanted patients as well as in the general immunecompetent HBV population. Success obtained in the last decade led some authors to the conclusion that HBV is now to consider just as a "mere nuisance".However, with regard to HBV and LT, outstanding issues are still on the table:(1)A standard HBV prophylaxis protocol after transplant has not yet been clearly defined;(2) The evidence of HBV resistant strains to the most potent antiviral agents is claiming for a new generation of drugs;and(3) The possibility of prophylaxis withdrawal in some patients has been demonstrated, but reliable methods for their selection are still lacking. The evolution of LT for HBV is examined in detail in this review together with the description of the strategies adopted to prevent HBV recurrence and their pros and cons.

Combined endovascular-surgical treatment for complex congenital intrahepatic arterioportal fistula: A case report and review of the literature

BACKGROUND Congenital intrahepatic arterioportal fistula(IAPF) is a rare vascular malformation in infants that causes severe portal hypertension(PH) with poor prognosis if untreated. Currently, radiological embolisation is considered the first-line therapy for simple IAPF; however, it might be not resolutive for complex hepatic vascular lesions. When endovascular embolization is not sufficient to completely obliterate the IAPF, surgical intervention is needed, but it has been associated with severe morbidity and mortality in small children.Furthermore, indications are not defined.CASE SUMMARY We present the first case of a 6-month-old girl with trisomy 21 affected by a complex congenital IAFP, which caused severe PH, successfully treated with an endovascular-surgical hybrid procedure. The novel technique comprised a multistep endovascular embolisation, including a superselective transarterial embolisation of the afferent vessels and a direct transhepatic embolisation of the dilated portal vein segment, combined with selective surgical ligation of the arterial branches that supply the fistula, which were too small to be embolised.The complex IAPF was also associated with severe cholestasis and intra/extrahepatic biliary tree dilatation, which was successfully treated by a temporary biliary drainage. At 24-mo follow-up, the hybrid endovascularsurgical procedure achieved complete occlusion of the complex IAPF and resolution of the PH. A comprehensive review of the literature on congenital IAPF management, focussed on alternative treatment strategies, is also reported.CONCLUSION The combined radiological-surgical approach is a safe and effective treatment option for complex IAPF and avoids major invasive surgery.

Prophylactic drains in totally laparoscopic distal gastrectomy:are they always necessary?

Prophylactic drains have always been a useful tool to detect early complications and prevent postoperative fluid collections,particularly in gastrointestinal surgery.Recently,the utilization of such drains has been debated,due to mounting evidence that they could be harmful rather than beneficial.Based on recent published articles,Liu et al reported that the routine use of prophylactic drains in total laparoscopic distal gastrectomy might not be necessary for all patients.Herein,we express our opinion regarding this interesting publication.

COVID-19 in a pregnant kidney transplant recipient-what we need to know:A case report

BACKGROUND In the era of the coronavirus disease 2019(COVID-19)pandemic,kidney transplant recipients are more susceptible to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus(SARS-CoV-2)infection,developing severe morbidity and graft impairment.Pregnant women are also more likely to develop severe COVID-19 disease,causing pregnancy complications such as preterm births and acute kidney injury.CASE SUMMARY Herein,we report the case of a pregnant woman with a third kidney transplantation who developed COVID-19 disease.The reduction of immunosuppressive drugs and strict monitoring of trough blood levels were needed to avoid severe SARS-CoV-2-related complications,and permitted to continue a healthy pregnancy and maintain good graft function.In such a complex scenario,the concomitance of COVID-19-related morbidity,the risk of acute rejection in the hyperimmune recipient,graft dysfunction and pregnancy complications make the management of immunosuppression a very difficult task and clinicians must be aware.CONCLUSION Tailoring the immunosuppressive regimen is a key factor affecting both the graft outcome and pregnancy safety.