Nest predation and avian brood parasitism are the main sources of nest failure in many passerine birds.Large predators threaten both brood and parents,whereas brood parasites pose only a danger to eggs or nestlings.Th...Nest predation and avian brood parasitism are the main sources of nest failure in many passerine birds.Large predators threaten both brood and parents,whereas brood parasites pose only a danger to eggs or nestlings.The fan-tailed gerygone Gerygone flavolateralis from New Caledonia is subjected to high rates of nest predation by the New Caledonian crow Corvus moneduloides(responsible for about 20-40%of predation)and moderate rates of brood parasitism by the shining bronze-cuckoo Chalcites lucidus(parasitizing about 18%of nests),which also depredates nests that are too advanced for parasitism(13%of nests).To test if fan-tailed gerygones are able to discriminate predators from brood parasites,we presented 3 bird models at active gerygone nests:a brood parasite/small nest predator(shining bronze-cuckoo),a large nest predator(crow),and a small non-native bird(common chaffinch Fringilla coelebs),which is unknown to the gerygone,as a control.We assessed the response of adult gerygones to the presentation of each model by measuring the minimum approach distance,number of alarm calls,number of attacks,and time to first nest visit after the presentation(latency).Adult gerygones often attacked the cuckoo,approached but never attacked the chaffinch and always avoided the crow.Latency was shorter after an attack response and during brooding,but similar among models.We did not find any link between the cuckoo model presentation and later ejection of cuckoo nestlings.We conclude that adult fan-tailed gerygones discriminate between different models and respond accordingly to the level of threat but do not show awareness of parasitism risk and increase of nestling ejection rates following exposure to the cuckoo model.展开更多
Nestling rejection is a rare type of host defense against brood parasitism compared with egg rejection.Theoretically,host defenses at both egg and nestling stages could be based on similar underlying discrimination me...Nestling rejection is a rare type of host defense against brood parasitism compared with egg rejection.Theoretically,host defenses at both egg and nestling stages could be based on similar underlying discrimination mechanisms but,due to the rarity of nestling rejector hosts,few studies have actually tested this hypothesis.We investigated egg and nestling discrimination by the fan-tailed gerygone Gerygone flavolateralis,a host that seemingly accepts nonmimetic eggs of its parasite,the shining bronze-cuckoo Chalcites lucidus,but ejects mimetic parasite nestlings.We introduced artificial eggs or nestlings and foreign gerygone nestlings in gerygone nests and compared begging calls of parasite and host nestlings.We found that the gerygone ejected artificial eggs only if their size was smaller than the parasite or host eggs.Ejection of artificial nestlings did not depend on whether their color matched that of the brood.The frequency of ejection increased during the course of the breeding season mirroring the increase in ejection frequency of parasite nestlings by the host.Cross-fostered gerygone nestlings were frequently ejected when lacking natal down and when introduced in the nest before hatching of the foster brood,but only occasionally when they did not match the color of the foster brood.Begging calls differed significantly between parasite and host nestlings throughout the nestling period.Our results suggest that the fan-tailed gerygone accepts eggs within the size range of gerygone and cuckoo eggs and that nestling discrimination is based on auditory and visual cues other than skin color.This highlights the importance of using a combined approach to study discrimination mechanisms of hosts.展开更多
When the pdf version of this paper first published,there were a number of errors in the reference list:accented letters were displaying incorrectly,leading to errors in author names throughout the list.This has now be...When the pdf version of this paper first published,there were a number of errors in the reference list:accented letters were displaying incorrectly,leading to errors in author names throughout the list.This has now been corrected online.展开更多
基金This study was funded by the National Science Centre,Poland,NCN 2016/23/B/NZ8/03082.
文摘Nest predation and avian brood parasitism are the main sources of nest failure in many passerine birds.Large predators threaten both brood and parents,whereas brood parasites pose only a danger to eggs or nestlings.The fan-tailed gerygone Gerygone flavolateralis from New Caledonia is subjected to high rates of nest predation by the New Caledonian crow Corvus moneduloides(responsible for about 20-40%of predation)and moderate rates of brood parasitism by the shining bronze-cuckoo Chalcites lucidus(parasitizing about 18%of nests),which also depredates nests that are too advanced for parasitism(13%of nests).To test if fan-tailed gerygones are able to discriminate predators from brood parasites,we presented 3 bird models at active gerygone nests:a brood parasite/small nest predator(shining bronze-cuckoo),a large nest predator(crow),and a small non-native bird(common chaffinch Fringilla coelebs),which is unknown to the gerygone,as a control.We assessed the response of adult gerygones to the presentation of each model by measuring the minimum approach distance,number of alarm calls,number of attacks,and time to first nest visit after the presentation(latency).Adult gerygones often attacked the cuckoo,approached but never attacked the chaffinch and always avoided the crow.Latency was shorter after an attack response and during brooding,but similar among models.We did not find any link between the cuckoo model presentation and later ejection of cuckoo nestlings.We conclude that adult fan-tailed gerygones discriminate between different models and respond accordingly to the level of threat but do not show awareness of parasitism risk and increase of nestling ejection rates following exposure to the cuckoo model.
基金This study was funded by the National Science Centre,Poland:NCN 2012/05/E/NZ8/02694 and NCN 2016/23/B/NZ8/03082the Japan Society for Promotion of Science(JSPS):grant no.24-4578(to N.J.S.)+1 种基金24770028(to K.D.T.),23255004(to K.U.)by Rikkyo University:SFR 11-54(to N.J.S.).
文摘Nestling rejection is a rare type of host defense against brood parasitism compared with egg rejection.Theoretically,host defenses at both egg and nestling stages could be based on similar underlying discrimination mechanisms but,due to the rarity of nestling rejector hosts,few studies have actually tested this hypothesis.We investigated egg and nestling discrimination by the fan-tailed gerygone Gerygone flavolateralis,a host that seemingly accepts nonmimetic eggs of its parasite,the shining bronze-cuckoo Chalcites lucidus,but ejects mimetic parasite nestlings.We introduced artificial eggs or nestlings and foreign gerygone nestlings in gerygone nests and compared begging calls of parasite and host nestlings.We found that the gerygone ejected artificial eggs only if their size was smaller than the parasite or host eggs.Ejection of artificial nestlings did not depend on whether their color matched that of the brood.The frequency of ejection increased during the course of the breeding season mirroring the increase in ejection frequency of parasite nestlings by the host.Cross-fostered gerygone nestlings were frequently ejected when lacking natal down and when introduced in the nest before hatching of the foster brood,but only occasionally when they did not match the color of the foster brood.Begging calls differed significantly between parasite and host nestlings throughout the nestling period.Our results suggest that the fan-tailed gerygone accepts eggs within the size range of gerygone and cuckoo eggs and that nestling discrimination is based on auditory and visual cues other than skin color.This highlights the importance of using a combined approach to study discrimination mechanisms of hosts.
文摘When the pdf version of this paper first published,there were a number of errors in the reference list:accented letters were displaying incorrectly,leading to errors in author names throughout the list.This has now been corrected online.