Conventional hepatectomy is an effective way to treat hepatocellular carcinoma.However,it is invasive and stressful.The use of laparoscopy in hepatectomy,while technically demanding,reduces surgical invasiveness and s...Conventional hepatectomy is an effective way to treat hepatocellular carcinoma.However,it is invasive and stressful.The use of laparoscopy in hepatectomy,while technically demanding,reduces surgical invasiveness and stressfulness but still achieves complete resection with adequate margins.Compared with conventional hepatectomy,laparoscopic hepatectomy provides a better chance and situation for further surgery in the case of recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma.Even aged patients can successfully endure repeated hepatectomy using laparoscopy,as shown in the present report.This report presents a case of repeated laparoscopic hepatectomy treating hepatocellular carcinoma and its recurrence in an aged patient having cirrhosis,a disease causing extra difficulty for performing laparoscopic hepatectomy.The report also describes techniques of the operation and displays characteristic results of laparoscopic hepatectomy such as smaller wounds,less blood loss,less pain,less scars and adhesion,shorter postoperative hospital stay,and faster recovery.展开更多
BACKGROUND: Chemoembolization with doxorubucin-eluting beads (DEB) has been used to treat hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) since 2007. This study compared the efifcacy and sur-vival between transarterial chemoembolizati...BACKGROUND: Chemoembolization with doxorubucin-eluting beads (DEB) has been used to treat hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) since 2007. This study compared the efifcacy and sur-vival between transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) with DEB and conventional approach (cTACE) in HCC treatment. METHODS: This retrospective case-control study compared the overall survival and tumor response of HCC patients to cTACE (n=190) and DEB (n=143) by the reassessment of com-puted tomography and serum alpha-fetoprotein (AFP). Mul-tivariate analysis was used to determine the factors affecting tumor response. RESULTS: The median post-treatment to pre-treatment AFP level was 0.8 for a DEB session (n=258) and 1.0 for a cTACE session (n=452), showing a signiifcantly greater decrease in AFP after DEB (P<0.05). More patients in the DEB group achieved objective response (complete and partial) compared with those in the cTACE group (P<0.05). Objective tumor re-sponse after DEB vs cTACE was 34.8% vs 15.4% in 0-3 months (P=0.001), 37.1% vs 20.0% in 3-6 months (P<0.05), and 50.0%vs 30.0% in 6-12 months (P=0.093). DEB predicted a 3.604 times odds of achieving at least one objective tumor response in a patient when compared to cTACE (P<0.0001). The median survival from ifrst transcatheter therapy of patients having undergone at least once DEB was 12.53 months, while those having received cTACE only was 10.53 months (P=0.086). A tendency of improved survival appeared to maintain until >80 months after the ifrst TACE session in the DEB group. CONCLUSION: DEB is a safe alternative to cTACE in HCC pa-tients with better therapeutic efifcacy.展开更多
文摘Conventional hepatectomy is an effective way to treat hepatocellular carcinoma.However,it is invasive and stressful.The use of laparoscopy in hepatectomy,while technically demanding,reduces surgical invasiveness and stressfulness but still achieves complete resection with adequate margins.Compared with conventional hepatectomy,laparoscopic hepatectomy provides a better chance and situation for further surgery in the case of recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma.Even aged patients can successfully endure repeated hepatectomy using laparoscopy,as shown in the present report.This report presents a case of repeated laparoscopic hepatectomy treating hepatocellular carcinoma and its recurrence in an aged patient having cirrhosis,a disease causing extra difficulty for performing laparoscopic hepatectomy.The report also describes techniques of the operation and displays characteristic results of laparoscopic hepatectomy such as smaller wounds,less blood loss,less pain,less scars and adhesion,shorter postoperative hospital stay,and faster recovery.
文摘BACKGROUND: Chemoembolization with doxorubucin-eluting beads (DEB) has been used to treat hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) since 2007. This study compared the efifcacy and sur-vival between transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) with DEB and conventional approach (cTACE) in HCC treatment. METHODS: This retrospective case-control study compared the overall survival and tumor response of HCC patients to cTACE (n=190) and DEB (n=143) by the reassessment of com-puted tomography and serum alpha-fetoprotein (AFP). Mul-tivariate analysis was used to determine the factors affecting tumor response. RESULTS: The median post-treatment to pre-treatment AFP level was 0.8 for a DEB session (n=258) and 1.0 for a cTACE session (n=452), showing a signiifcantly greater decrease in AFP after DEB (P<0.05). More patients in the DEB group achieved objective response (complete and partial) compared with those in the cTACE group (P<0.05). Objective tumor re-sponse after DEB vs cTACE was 34.8% vs 15.4% in 0-3 months (P=0.001), 37.1% vs 20.0% in 3-6 months (P<0.05), and 50.0%vs 30.0% in 6-12 months (P=0.093). DEB predicted a 3.604 times odds of achieving at least one objective tumor response in a patient when compared to cTACE (P<0.0001). The median survival from ifrst transcatheter therapy of patients having undergone at least once DEB was 12.53 months, while those having received cTACE only was 10.53 months (P=0.086). A tendency of improved survival appeared to maintain until >80 months after the ifrst TACE session in the DEB group. CONCLUSION: DEB is a safe alternative to cTACE in HCC pa-tients with better therapeutic efifcacy.
