Objectives: To extend previous evaluations of costs of cystic fibrosis (CF) diagnosis and examine key issues in assessing the CF cost of care. Study design: Costs for CF newborn screening (NBS) including CF multi-muta...Objectives: To extend previous evaluations of costs of cystic fibrosis (CF) diagnosis and examine key issues in assessing the CF cost of care. Study design: Costs for CF newborn screening (NBS) including CF multi-mutation testing are analyzed by using data from the Wisconsin State Laboratory of Hygiene. Electronic data from 2 Wisconsin CF centers are used to illustrate the complexity of analyzing CF health care utilization and costs. Results: The current cost-per-newborn of a CF multi-mutation test is 50% higher than testing for a single mutation. Data collection for the cost-of-care study requires a combination of electronic and manual data collection; modeling of cost data requires consideration of any censoring. Hospitalizations are shown to have a large impact on costs and show high variability at the individual level. Sixty-nine percent of children with meconium ileus had some hospitalization versus 56% of children without meconium ileus. Conclusion: A cost-benefit analysis of CF multi-mutation testing is warranted. The study of health care cost data is complex and utilization varies between children. Individual-level modeling of CF costs must include factors contributing to the severity of the disease and allow for consideration of individual-level utilization, such as the number of hospitalizations.展开更多
文摘Objectives: To extend previous evaluations of costs of cystic fibrosis (CF) diagnosis and examine key issues in assessing the CF cost of care. Study design: Costs for CF newborn screening (NBS) including CF multi-mutation testing are analyzed by using data from the Wisconsin State Laboratory of Hygiene. Electronic data from 2 Wisconsin CF centers are used to illustrate the complexity of analyzing CF health care utilization and costs. Results: The current cost-per-newborn of a CF multi-mutation test is 50% higher than testing for a single mutation. Data collection for the cost-of-care study requires a combination of electronic and manual data collection; modeling of cost data requires consideration of any censoring. Hospitalizations are shown to have a large impact on costs and show high variability at the individual level. Sixty-nine percent of children with meconium ileus had some hospitalization versus 56% of children without meconium ileus. Conclusion: A cost-benefit analysis of CF multi-mutation testing is warranted. The study of health care cost data is complex and utilization varies between children. Individual-level modeling of CF costs must include factors contributing to the severity of the disease and allow for consideration of individual-level utilization, such as the number of hospitalizations.
