期刊文献+
共找到3篇文章
< 1 >
每页显示 20 50 100
Calculation of watershed flow concentration based on the grid drop concept 被引量:9
1
作者 rui xiaofang Yu Mei +1 位作者 Liu Fanggui Gong Xinglong 《Water Science and Engineering》 EI CAS 2008年第1期1-9,共9页
The grid drop concept is introduced and used to develop a micromechanism-based methodology for calculating watershed flow concentration. The flow path and distance traveled by a grid drop to the outlet of the watershe... The grid drop concept is introduced and used to develop a micromechanism-based methodology for calculating watershed flow concentration. The flow path and distance traveled by a grid drop to the outlet of the watershed are obtained using a digital elevation model (DEM). Regarding the slope as an uneven carpet through which the grid drop passes, a formula for overland flow velocity differing from Manning's formula for stream flow as welt as Darcy's formula for pore flow is proposed. Compared with the commonly used unit hydrograph and isochronal methods, this new methodology has outstanding advantages in that it considers the influences of the slope velocity field and the heterogeneity of spatial distribution of rainfall on the flow concentration process, and includes only one parameter that needs to be calibrated. This method can also be effectively applied to the prediction of hydrologic processes in un-gauged basins. 展开更多
关键词 micromechanisms of watershed flow concentration grid drop overland flow velocity formula spatial velocity field watershed runoff concentration time digital elevation model
下载PDF
Nash Model Parameter Uncertainty Analysis by AM-MCMC Based on BFS and Probabilistic Flood Forecasting 被引量:4
2
作者 XING Zhenxiang rui xiaofang +2 位作者 FU Qiang JIYi ZHU Shijiang 《Chinese Geographical Science》 SCIE CSCD 2011年第1期74-83,共10页
A hydrologic model consists of several parameters which are usually calibrated based on observed hy-drologic processes. Due to the uncertainty of the hydrologic processes, model parameters are also uncertain, which fu... A hydrologic model consists of several parameters which are usually calibrated based on observed hy-drologic processes. Due to the uncertainty of the hydrologic processes, model parameters are also uncertain, which further leads to the uncertainty of forecast results of a hydrologic model. Working with the Bayesian Forecasting System (BFS), Markov Chain Monte Carlo simulation based Adaptive Metropolis method (AM-MCMC) was used to study parameter uncertainty of Nash model, while the probabilistic flood forecasting was made with the simu-lated samples of parameters of Nash model. The results of a case study shows that the AM-MCMC based on BFS proposed in this paper is suitable to obtain the posterior distribution of the parameters of Nash model according to the known information of the parameters. The use of Nash model and AM-MCMC based on BFS was able to make the probabilistic flood forecast as well as to find the mean and variance of flood discharge, which may be useful to estimate the risk of flood control decision. 展开更多
关键词 MCMC方法 概率洪水预报 模型参数 不确定性 纳什 矿渣 概率分析 马尔可夫链蒙特卡罗方法
下载PDF
Discussion of Muskingum method parameter X 被引量:3
3
作者 rui xiaofang Liu Fanggui Yu Mei 《Water Science and Engineering》 EI CAS 2008年第3期16-23,共8页
The parameter X of the Muskingum method is a physical parameter that reflects the flood peak attenuation and hydrograph shape flattening of a diffusion wave in motion. In this paper, the historic process that hydrolog... The parameter X of the Muskingum method is a physical parameter that reflects the flood peak attenuation and hydrograph shape flattening of a diffusion wave in motion. In this paper, the historic process that hydrologists have undergone to find a physical explanation of this parameter is briefly discussed. Based on the fact that the Muskingum method is the second-order accuracy difference solution to the diffusion wave equation, its numerical stability condition is analyzed, and a conclusion is drawn: X ≤ 0.5 is the uniform condition satisfying the demands for its physical meaning and numerical stability. It is also pointed out that the methods that regard the sum of squares of differences between the calculated and observed discharges or stages as the objective function and the routing coefficients C0, C1 and C2 of the Muskingum method as the optimization parameters cannot guarantee the physical meaning of X. 展开更多
关键词 Muskingum method parameter X physical meaning numerical analysis stability condition parameter calibration
下载PDF
上一页 1 下一页 到第
使用帮助 返回顶部