For sperm cryopreservation,the conventional method,which requires glycerol,has been used for a long time.In addition,the permeable cryoprotectant-free vitrification method has been continuously studied.Although the di...For sperm cryopreservation,the conventional method,which requires glycerol,has been used for a long time.In addition,the permeable cryoprotectant-free vitrification method has been continuously studied.Although the differences of cryopreservation effects between the two methods have being studied,differences in microRNA(miRNA)profiles between them remain unclear.In this study,we investigated the differences in miRNA expression profiles among conventional freezing sperm,droplet vitrification freezing sperm and fresh human sperm.We also analyzed the differences between these methods in terms of differentially expressed miRNAs(DEmiRs)related to early embryonic development and paternal epigenetics.Our results showed no significant differences between the cryopreservation methods in terms of sperm motility ratio,plasma membrane integrity,DNA integrity,mitochondrial membrane potential,acrosome integrity,and ultrastructural damage.However,sperm miRNA-sequencing showed differences between the two methods in terms of the numbers of DEmiRs(28 and 19 with vitrification using a nonpermeable cryoprotectant and the conventional method,respectively)in postthaw and fresh sperm specimens.DEmiRs related to early embryonic development and paternal epigenetics mainly included common DEmiRs between the groups.Our results showed that the differences between conventional freezing and droplet vitrification were minimal in terms of miRNA expression related to embryonic development and epigenetics.Changes in sperm miRNA expression due to freezing are not always detrimental to embryonic development.This study compared differences in miRNA expression profiles before and after cryopreservation between cryopreservation by conventional and vitrification methods.It offers a new perspective to evaluate various methods of sperm cryopreservation.展开更多
文摘For sperm cryopreservation,the conventional method,which requires glycerol,has been used for a long time.In addition,the permeable cryoprotectant-free vitrification method has been continuously studied.Although the differences of cryopreservation effects between the two methods have being studied,differences in microRNA(miRNA)profiles between them remain unclear.In this study,we investigated the differences in miRNA expression profiles among conventional freezing sperm,droplet vitrification freezing sperm and fresh human sperm.We also analyzed the differences between these methods in terms of differentially expressed miRNAs(DEmiRs)related to early embryonic development and paternal epigenetics.Our results showed no significant differences between the cryopreservation methods in terms of sperm motility ratio,plasma membrane integrity,DNA integrity,mitochondrial membrane potential,acrosome integrity,and ultrastructural damage.However,sperm miRNA-sequencing showed differences between the two methods in terms of the numbers of DEmiRs(28 and 19 with vitrification using a nonpermeable cryoprotectant and the conventional method,respectively)in postthaw and fresh sperm specimens.DEmiRs related to early embryonic development and paternal epigenetics mainly included common DEmiRs between the groups.Our results showed that the differences between conventional freezing and droplet vitrification were minimal in terms of miRNA expression related to embryonic development and epigenetics.Changes in sperm miRNA expression due to freezing are not always detrimental to embryonic development.This study compared differences in miRNA expression profiles before and after cryopreservation between cryopreservation by conventional and vitrification methods.It offers a new perspective to evaluate various methods of sperm cryopreservation.
