期刊文献+
共找到5篇文章
< 1 >
每页显示 20 50 100
播期与种植密度对冬小麦新品种衡麦26产量及其构成因素的影响 被引量:3
1
作者 孟祥海 乔文臣 +4 位作者 赵明辉 李丁 孙书娈 李强 鲁关立 《河北农业科学》 2020年第5期24-28,共5页
为明确冬小麦新品种衡麦26的丰产高效栽培技术,实现良种良法配套,同时也为生产提供科学的理论依据,采用裂区试验设计,主处理播期设10月4日、10月9日、10月14日、10月19日、10月24日共5个水平,副处理种植密度(基本苗数量)设150万、225万... 为明确冬小麦新品种衡麦26的丰产高效栽培技术,实现良种良法配套,同时也为生产提供科学的理论依据,采用裂区试验设计,主处理播期设10月4日、10月9日、10月14日、10月19日、10月24日共5个水平,副处理种植密度(基本苗数量)设150万、225万、300万、375万和450万株/hm^2共6个水平,研究了不同播期与种植密度对该品种产量及其构成因素的影响。结果表明:播期对衡麦26穗粒数影响不大,对有效穗数和千粒重影响显著,表现为随着播期推迟,小麦有效穗数降低,千粒重提高。10月9日播种的小麦产量最高;此后随着播期推迟,产量下降,播期推迟至24日,由于穗粒数和千粒重的补偿效应增加,小麦产量有所提高。除基本苗150万株/hm^2处理的产量显著降低外,其他种植密度处理的产量差异均不显著,然而,随着种植密度的增大,小麦有效穗数虽然逐渐增多,但穗粒数和千粒重呈降低趋势。衡麦26产量构成三因素协调、丰产潜力较大,晚播有利于千粒重的提高,低密度有利于穗粒数的增加。衡麦26产量(Y)与播期(X1)和种植密度(X2)的回归方程为Y=449.033966+0.6587600000X1+10.398165714X2-0.05560571429X1^2-0.23081714286X2^2。综合分析认为,衡麦26的适宜播期为10月9~19日,适宜种植密度为基本苗数量225万~450万株/hm^2,最佳密度为基本苗300万~375万株/hm^2。 展开更多
关键词 冬小麦 衡麦26 播期 种植密度 产量 产量构成因素
下载PDF
衡麦节水小麦选育技术创新实践与思考 被引量:2
2
作者 乔文臣 孟祥海 +5 位作者 李强 李丁 孙书娈 赵明辉 王雪征 鲁关立 《河北农业科学》 2022年第1期90-94,共5页
针对我国北方干旱缺水、小麦生育后期高温热害频发的实际情况,河北省农林科学院旱作农业研究所利用衡水市独特的生态气候条件,立足冀中南,面向黄淮麦区,围绕小麦产业要求,以节水抗旱、高产广适为目标,以提高小麦品种的水分利用效率为核... 针对我国北方干旱缺水、小麦生育后期高温热害频发的实际情况,河北省农林科学院旱作农业研究所利用衡水市独特的生态气候条件,立足冀中南,面向黄淮麦区,围绕小麦产业要求,以节水抗旱、高产广适为目标,以提高小麦品种的水分利用效率为核心,同时关注耐热性等抗逆性筛选,先后育成衡观35、衡4399等衡麦系列节水高产冬小麦新品种26个(10个国审)。创新形成“衡麦选育技术体系”,注重产量三因素的协调选择和表型差异化的选育,在株型改良的基础上强化抗逆、抗病性的鉴选,不断加强常规技术与分子技术的有机结合,形成衡麦节水小麦选育研究的综合特色。 展开更多
关键词 节水 抗旱 高产 广适 冬小麦 品种选育 衡麦选育技术体系
下载PDF
节水 高产冬小麦新品种衡H116021的选育 被引量:1
3
作者 李丁 孙书娈 +7 位作者 孟祥海 李强 魏建伟 陈秀敏 赵明辉 李会敏 赵凤梧 乔文臣 《河北农业科学》 2019年第2期76-78,F0003,共4页
衡H116021是河北省农林科学院旱作农业研究所以(衡7228×衡94-5096) F1为母本、石97-6365 (石家庄8号)为父本,采用系谱选择法和水旱交替选择法选育的冬小麦新品种。该品种突出特点是抗寒耐低温,节水性强,高抗条锈,中感叶锈病,中抗... 衡H116021是河北省农林科学院旱作农业研究所以(衡7228×衡94-5096) F1为母本、石97-6365 (石家庄8号)为父本,采用系谱选择法和水旱交替选择法选育的冬小麦新品种。该品种突出特点是抗寒耐低温,节水性强,高抗条锈,中感叶锈病,中抗白粉病,抗干热风,熟相好。2014~2015年参加河北省冀中南水地组小麦品种区域试验,平均产量为8 839.1 kg/hm^2,较对照石4185增产8.4%。2016年参加河北省冀中南水地组小麦品种生产试验,平均产量为8 507.6 kg/hm^2,较对照衡4399增产2.3%。2018年7月通过河北省农作物品种审定委员会审定(审定编号:冀审麦20180033)。该品种适宜在冀中南冬麦区中高水肥地块种植。 展开更多
关键词 节水育种 高产育种 冬小麦 衡H116021 栽培技术
下载PDF
Evaluation of a new method for quantification of heat tolerance in different wheat cultivars 被引量:1
4
作者 LI Qiang WANG Zheng-rui +8 位作者 LI Ding WEI Jian-wei QIAO Wen-chen MENG Xiang-hai sun shu-luan LI Hui-min ZHAO Ming-hui CHEN Xiu-min ZHAO Feng-wu 《Journal of Integrative Agriculture》 SCIE CAS CSCD 2018年第4期786-795,共10页
Heat stress seriously affects wheat production in many regions of the world. At present, heat tolerance research remains one of the least understood fields in wheat genetics and breeding and there is a lack of effecti... Heat stress seriously affects wheat production in many regions of the world. At present, heat tolerance research remains one of the least understood fields in wheat genetics and breeding and there is a lack of effective methods to quantify heat stress and heat tolerance in different wheat cultivars. The objective of this study was to use various wheat cultivars to evaluate stress intensity(δ) and a new method for quantification of heat tolerance and compare this technique with three other currently utilized methods. This new parameter for heat tolerance quantification is referred to as the heat tolerance index(HTI) and is an indicator of both yield potential and yield stability. Heat treatments were applied in a controlled setting when anthesis had been reached for 80% of the wheat. The stress intensity evaluation indicated heat shock was the main factor associated with kernel weight reduction while grain yield reduction was mainly associated with chronic high temperature. The methods evaluation showed that a temperature difference of 5°C from natural temperatures was a suitable heat treatment to compare to the untreated controls. HTI was positively correlated with yield under heat stress(r=0.8657, δ=0.15, in 2009–2010; r=0.8418, δ=0.20, in 2010–2011; P<0.01), and negatively correlated with yield reduction rate(r=–0.8344, in 2009–2010; r=–0.7158, in 2010–2011; P<0.01). The results of this study validated the use of HTI and temperature difference control for quantifying wheat heat tolerance that included the yield potential and the stability of different wheat cultivars under heat stress. Additionally, 10 wheat cultivars showed high HTI and should be further tested for their heat confirming characteristics for use in wheat heat tolerance breeding. 展开更多
关键词 wheat breeding heat tolerance quantification HTI temperature difference controlling stress intensity
下载PDF
Heat stability of winter wheat depends on cultivars, timing and protective methods
5
作者 LI Qiang CHANG Xu-hong +5 位作者 MENG Xiang-hai LI Ding ZHAO Ming-hui sun shu-luan LI Hui-min QIAO Wen-chen 《Journal of Integrative Agriculture》 SCIE CAS CSCD 2020年第8期1984-1997,共14页
Heat stress negatively affects wheat production in many regions of the world.At present,sensitivity to heat stress remains one of the least understood aspects of wheat genetics and breeding,and measures for preventing... Heat stress negatively affects wheat production in many regions of the world.At present,sensitivity to heat stress remains one of the least understood aspects of wheat genetics and breeding,and measures for preventing heat stress are understudied.In this study,we used three cultivars of winter wheat(GY2018,SL02-1 and SY20)to evaluate the effect of heat stress at different days after anthesis(DAA)on yield and quality.Heat stability of the cultivars were analyzed and evaluated for the effects of two kinds of regulators on wheat under heat stress conditions.Heat treatment at 7 DAA led to the most substantial reduction in yield while GY2018 had the best heat stability with respect to yield,and demonstrated the most positive effects on several quality traits including protein content,sedimentation volume and glutenin and gliadin contents.Heat treatment at 14 DAA had the least reduction in yield,while SY20 had the best heat stability with respect to yield and heat treatment had minimal effects on quality.Heat treatment at 21 DAA had only a limited effect on yield,while SL02-1 had the best heat stability with respect to yield,but it showed the most negative effects on quality.Stable time at 14 DAA and protein content at 21 DAA can be used as indicators for detecting the stability of quality under heat stress.Among the three studied cultivars,SY20 was the most sensitive to heat stress with the stable time decreasing from 26.4 to 9.1 min,a higher sedimentation volume at 7 DAA,and a lowerγ-gliadin content which increased 2.4-fold under high-temperature treatment.The addition of various regulators had different effects:potassium dihydrogen phosphate(KDP)was more protective of yield with heat stress at 7 DAA,while Duntianbao(DTB)had better effects on quality with heat stress at 21 DAA. 展开更多
关键词 WHEAT high temperature heat stability YIELD quality prevention
下载PDF
上一页 1 下一页 到第
使用帮助 返回顶部