Background:There is little information describing the perceptions of gastroenterology fellows and attending gastroenterologists of what constitutes effective teaching of endoscopy.We sought to identify common themes r...Background:There is little information describing the perceptions of gastroenterology fellows and attending gastroenterologists of what constitutes effective teaching of endoscopy.We sought to identify common themes regarding endoscopy training methods and their impact among fellows and attendings.Methods:Focus group exercises and surveys were conducted among fellows,about educational resources,teaching techniques and ways of improving the teaching of endoscopy.The fellows identified the‘best’teachers of endoscopy,who were interviewed regarding their training in endoscopy,their teaching methods,key points of information,and opinions on endoscopy curriculum.Results:Nineteen fellows(68%)had attended the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy First Year Fellows’Endoscopy course and found it very helpful.Thirteen fellows(46%)had exposure to an endoscopy simulator,but their median duration of use was only 1 hour.Only two out of five fellowship programs used a formal endoscopic skill assessment tool and none of the programs had an endoscopy curriculum of which the fellows were aware.Fellows reported that they learned endoscopy best by performing procedures.They also volunteered that attending gastroenterologists used variable teaching methods,and might benefit from instruction on how to teach endoscopy.Ten attending gastroenterologists(77%)had received training in advanced procedures;none received formal training on teaching endoscopy:they all felt that such training would be beneficial.Conclusions:A standardized endoscopy curriculum may be beneficial to fellows,who prefer to learn endoscopy by performing procedures—but they want explicit and specific instruction.Both those attending and the fellows thought that formal instruction for attending gastroenterologists on how to teach endoscopy would be beneficial,indicating a role for a‘teachthe-teacher’curriculum.展开更多
基金Dr.Robert C.Lowe acknowledges his faculty development grant fromthe Boston University Medical Center Department of Medicine for$1,000.
文摘Background:There is little information describing the perceptions of gastroenterology fellows and attending gastroenterologists of what constitutes effective teaching of endoscopy.We sought to identify common themes regarding endoscopy training methods and their impact among fellows and attendings.Methods:Focus group exercises and surveys were conducted among fellows,about educational resources,teaching techniques and ways of improving the teaching of endoscopy.The fellows identified the‘best’teachers of endoscopy,who were interviewed regarding their training in endoscopy,their teaching methods,key points of information,and opinions on endoscopy curriculum.Results:Nineteen fellows(68%)had attended the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy First Year Fellows’Endoscopy course and found it very helpful.Thirteen fellows(46%)had exposure to an endoscopy simulator,but their median duration of use was only 1 hour.Only two out of five fellowship programs used a formal endoscopic skill assessment tool and none of the programs had an endoscopy curriculum of which the fellows were aware.Fellows reported that they learned endoscopy best by performing procedures.They also volunteered that attending gastroenterologists used variable teaching methods,and might benefit from instruction on how to teach endoscopy.Ten attending gastroenterologists(77%)had received training in advanced procedures;none received formal training on teaching endoscopy:they all felt that such training would be beneficial.Conclusions:A standardized endoscopy curriculum may be beneficial to fellows,who prefer to learn endoscopy by performing procedures—but they want explicit and specific instruction.Both those attending and the fellows thought that formal instruction for attending gastroenterologists on how to teach endoscopy would be beneficial,indicating a role for a‘teachthe-teacher’curriculum.
