Introduction: The epidemic of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease in the Western World accounts for the majority of morbidity and mortality in adults. This disease is on the increase, and previous recommendations u...Introduction: The epidemic of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease in the Western World accounts for the majority of morbidity and mortality in adults. This disease is on the increase, and previous recommendations using “risk equations” to prescribe preventive treatment have not been successful in reducing the prevalence of cardiovascular disease. Furthermore, compliance with statin medication has been limited, with approximately 50% of individuals being non-compliant within five years. This situation is unacceptable since atherosclerosis is both preventable and reversible. Methods: The guidelines presented in this article utilize coronary artery calcium scanning as the basis for preventative therapeutic decisions and identifying the presence of asymptomatic cardiovascular disease. This radiographic technique is superior to “risk equations” in predicting future cardiovascular events. It provides a comprehensive assessment of the lifelong insults to the coronary artery vascular endothelium and the resulting inflammation. Coronary artery calcium scanning is widely available, inexpensive, safe, and reproducible. It has the major advantage of increasing treatment compliance in patients with positive coronary artery calcium scores. Results: All suggested guidelines are supported by published scientific data. Citations are provided to allow the reader to obtain further information. The authors are available for further consultation. Each guideline provides specific recommendations that the primary caregiver can discuss with the patient. Patient involvement in decision-making is strongly recommended. Both treatment costs and adverse effects are minimal. Conclusion: It is anticipated that the early identification of asymptomatic cardiovascular disease and its aggressive treatment will result in regression of subclinical atherosclerosis. Adoption of these guidelines will stop the epidemic of symptomatic heart disease and result in healthier and more satisfied patients.展开更多
Purpose: Cardiovascular disease is the number one cause of death in the Western world. The purpose of this manuscript is to compare the benefits and deficiencies of coronary artery calcium scanning versus compute...Purpose: Cardiovascular disease is the number one cause of death in the Western world. The purpose of this manuscript is to compare the benefits and deficiencies of coronary artery calcium scanning versus computer generated risk equations in identifying atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. These two approaches provide significantly different cardiovascular risk assessments and often lead to therapeutic differences in recommendations from the physician to the patient. Methods: Pertinent medical literature is reviewed concerning both risk assessment approaches (i.e., coronary artery scanning and computer generated risk equations). The strengths and weaknesses of both approaches are discussed, and recommendations are provided based upon available data. Results: Cardiovascular risk equations are simple and readily obtained at no charge by physicians. However, their drawbacks are several, including non-applicability to specific populations, disagreements among different cardiovascular society risk equations, wide ranges of risk outputs (e.g., intermediate 10-year risk is between 5% and 20%), inability to definitively identify coronary artery plaques, and lack of definitive anatomical coronary disease. Alternatively, coronary artery calcium scanning costs approximately $100/scan (if not covered by insurance), requires time and effort by the patient, and exposes the patient to a minimal amount of radiation. However, coronary calcium scanning identifies specific atherosclerotic coronary disease and provides additional information about the anatomical location (i.e., coronary artery) of the atherosclerotic plaque. Conclusion: Based on the published literature, coronary artery calcium scanning is the preferred approach for identifying atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Although there are minor drawbacks, overall it provides superior clinical information compared with computer generated risk equations.展开更多
文摘Introduction: The epidemic of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease in the Western World accounts for the majority of morbidity and mortality in adults. This disease is on the increase, and previous recommendations using “risk equations” to prescribe preventive treatment have not been successful in reducing the prevalence of cardiovascular disease. Furthermore, compliance with statin medication has been limited, with approximately 50% of individuals being non-compliant within five years. This situation is unacceptable since atherosclerosis is both preventable and reversible. Methods: The guidelines presented in this article utilize coronary artery calcium scanning as the basis for preventative therapeutic decisions and identifying the presence of asymptomatic cardiovascular disease. This radiographic technique is superior to “risk equations” in predicting future cardiovascular events. It provides a comprehensive assessment of the lifelong insults to the coronary artery vascular endothelium and the resulting inflammation. Coronary artery calcium scanning is widely available, inexpensive, safe, and reproducible. It has the major advantage of increasing treatment compliance in patients with positive coronary artery calcium scores. Results: All suggested guidelines are supported by published scientific data. Citations are provided to allow the reader to obtain further information. The authors are available for further consultation. Each guideline provides specific recommendations that the primary caregiver can discuss with the patient. Patient involvement in decision-making is strongly recommended. Both treatment costs and adverse effects are minimal. Conclusion: It is anticipated that the early identification of asymptomatic cardiovascular disease and its aggressive treatment will result in regression of subclinical atherosclerosis. Adoption of these guidelines will stop the epidemic of symptomatic heart disease and result in healthier and more satisfied patients.
文摘Purpose: Cardiovascular disease is the number one cause of death in the Western world. The purpose of this manuscript is to compare the benefits and deficiencies of coronary artery calcium scanning versus computer generated risk equations in identifying atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. These two approaches provide significantly different cardiovascular risk assessments and often lead to therapeutic differences in recommendations from the physician to the patient. Methods: Pertinent medical literature is reviewed concerning both risk assessment approaches (i.e., coronary artery scanning and computer generated risk equations). The strengths and weaknesses of both approaches are discussed, and recommendations are provided based upon available data. Results: Cardiovascular risk equations are simple and readily obtained at no charge by physicians. However, their drawbacks are several, including non-applicability to specific populations, disagreements among different cardiovascular society risk equations, wide ranges of risk outputs (e.g., intermediate 10-year risk is between 5% and 20%), inability to definitively identify coronary artery plaques, and lack of definitive anatomical coronary disease. Alternatively, coronary artery calcium scanning costs approximately $100/scan (if not covered by insurance), requires time and effort by the patient, and exposes the patient to a minimal amount of radiation. However, coronary calcium scanning identifies specific atherosclerotic coronary disease and provides additional information about the anatomical location (i.e., coronary artery) of the atherosclerotic plaque. Conclusion: Based on the published literature, coronary artery calcium scanning is the preferred approach for identifying atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Although there are minor drawbacks, overall it provides superior clinical information compared with computer generated risk equations.