Can trans-anal reinforcing sutures after double stapling in lower anterior resection reduce the need for a temporary diverting ostomy?

AIM:To evaluate trans-anal reinforcing sutures in low anterior resection using the double-stapled anastomosis technique for primary rectal cancers performed at a single institution.METHODS:The data of patients who received transanal reinforcing sutures were compared with those of patients who did not receive them after low anterior resection.Patients who underwent laparoscopic low anterior resection and the double-stapled anastomosis technique for primary rectal cancer between January2008 and December 2011 were included in this study.Patients with no anastomosis,a hand-sewn anastomosis,high anterior resection,or preoperative chemoradiation were excluded.The primary outcomes measured were the incidence of postoperative anastomotic complications and placement of a diverting ileostomy.RESULTS:Among 110 patients,the rate of placement of a diverting ileostomy was significantly lower in the suture group(SG)compared with the non-suture control group(CG)[SG,n=6(12.8%);CG,n=19(30.2%),P=0.031].No significant difference was observed in the rate of anastomotic leakage[SG,n=3(6.4%);CG,n=5(7.9%)].CONCLUSION:Trans-anal reinforcing sutures may reduce the need for diverting ileostomy.A randomized prospective study with a larger population should be performed in the future to demonstrate the efficacy of trans-anal reinforcing sutures.

Current status of robot-assisted gastric surgery

In an effort to minimize the limitations of laparoscopy,a robotic surgery system was introduced,but its role for gastric cancer is still unclear.The objective of this article is to assess the current status of robotic surgery for gastric cancer and to predict future prospects.Although the current study was limited by its small number of patients and retrospective nature,robot-assisted gastrectomy with lymphadenectomy for the treatment of gastric cancer is a feasible and safe procedure for experienced laparoscopic surgeons.Most studies have reported satisfactory results for postoperative short-term coutcomes,such as:postoperative oral feeding,gas out,hospital stay and complications,compared with laparoscopic surgery;the difference is a longer operation time.However,robotic surgery showed a shallow learning curve compared with the familarity of conventional open surgery;after the accumulation of several cases,robotic surgery could be expected to result in a similar operation time.Robotic-assisted gastrectomy can expand the indications of minimally invasive surgery to include advanced gastric cancer by improving the ability to perform lymphadenectomy.Moreover," total" robotic gastrectomy can be facilitated using a robotsewing technique and gastric submucosal tumors near the gastroesophageal junction or pylorus can be resected safely by this novel technique.In conclusion,robotassisted gastrectomy may offer a good alternative to conventional open or laparoscopic surgery for gastric cancer,provided that long-term oncologic outcomes can be confirmed.

Bowel function and quality of life after minimally invasive colectomy with D3 lymphadenectomy for right-sided colon adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND Changes in bowel function after right-sided colectomy are not well understood compared to those associated with left-sided colectomy or rectal resection.In particular,there are concerns about bowel function after right-sided colectomy with complete mesocolic excision,which has become popular in the West.AIM To evaluate the functional outcomes of patients who underwent right-sided colectomy with D3 lymphadenectomy for colon cancer.METHODS Functional data from patients who underwent minimally invasive right-sided colectomy for colon cancer from October 2017 to September 2018 were prospectively collected.Functional outcomes were evaluated preoperatively and at 3,6,12,and 18 mo postoperatively.RESULTS Prior to surgery,57 patients answered the questionnaire,and 47 responded at three months,52 at 6 mo,52 at 12 mo,and 25 at 18 mo postoperatively.Most scales of quality of life and bowel function improved significantly over time.Urgency persisted to a high degree throughout the period without a significant change over time.The use of medications for defecation was about 10%over the entire period.Gas(P=0.023)and fecal frequency(P<0.001)increased,and bowel dysfunction group(P=0.028)was more common among patients taking medication.At six months,resected bowel and colon lengths were significantly different as a risk factor between the dysfunction group and the no dysfunction group[odd ratio(OR):1.095,P=0.026;OR:1.147,P=0.031,respectively]in univariate analysis,but not in multivariate analysis.CONCLUSION Despite D3 lymphadenectomy,most bowel symptoms improved over time after right-sided colectomy using a minimally invasive approach,and continuous medication was needed in only approximately 10%of patients.

Hepatothorax due to a right diaphragmatic rupture related to duodenal ulcer perforation

Here, we present the case of a 53-year-old man with a hepatothorax due to a right diaphragmatic rupture related to duodenal ulcer perforation. On admission, the patient complained of severe acute abdominal pain, with physical examination findings suspicious for a perforated peptic ulcer. Of note, the patient had no history of other medical conditions or recent trauma, and the initial chest radiography and laboratory findings were not specific. A subsequent abdominal computed tomography revealed intrathoracic displacement of the liver, gallbladder, transverse colon and omentum through a right diaphragmatic defect. The patient then underwent an explorative laparotomy that confirmed duodenal ulcer perforation. A primary repair of the duodenal perforation was performed, and the diaphrag-matic defect was repaired using a polytetrafluoroeth-ylene patch after the organs were reduced and the cavity irrigated. This particular case proves interesting as right-sided spontaneous diaphragmatic ruptures are very rare and difficult to diagnose. Additionally, the best treatment for such large diaphragmatic defects is still controversial, especially in cases of intrathoracic or intra-abdominal contamination.

Clinical characteristics of patients in their forties who underwent surgical resection for colorectal cancer in Korea

BACKGROUND The proportion of young patients with colorectal cancer(CRC),especially in their 40s,is increasing worldwide.AIM To confirm the clinical characteristics of such patients,we planned a study comparing them to patients in their 30s and 50s.METHODS Patients undergoing primary resection for CRC,patients in their 30s,40s and 50s were included in the study.Patient and tumor characteristics,and perioperative and oncologic outcomes were compared.RESULTS Most clinical characteristics of 451(10.5%)patients in their 40s were more similar to those of patients in their 30s than those in their 50s.On pathology data,there were more metastatic lesions(30s vs 40s vs 50s;17.5%vs 21.1%vs 14.9%,P=0.012)in patients in their 40s.There was a trend toward less frequent K-ras mutations among patients in their 40s(48.5%vs 33.3%vs 44.5%,P=0.064).The proportion of patients receiving postoperative chemotherapy was also significantly greater among patients in their 40s(58.3%vs 63.9%vs 56.3%,P=0.032).Five-year overall survival(OS)and disease-free survival(DFS)did not differ between the three groups(5-year OS,92.2%vs 89.8%vs 92.2%,P=0.804;5-year total DFS,98.6%vs 95.7%vs 96.1%,P=0.754;5-year local DFS,98.6%vs 94.3%vs 94.9%,P=0.579;5-year systemic DFS,86.4%vs 87.9%vs 86.4%,P=0.908).CONCLUSION Patients with CRC in their 40s showed significantly more numerous metastatic lesions.The oncologic outcome of stage 1-3 patients in their 40s was not inferior compared to that of those in their 30s and 50s.