Backgrounds:Azithromycin mass drug administration(MDA)is a key part of the strategy for controlling trachoma.This systematic review aimed to comprehensively summarize the present studies of azithromycin MDA on trachom...Backgrounds:Azithromycin mass drug administration(MDA)is a key part of the strategy for controlling trachoma.This systematic review aimed to comprehensively summarize the present studies of azithromycin MDA on trachoma;provide an overview of the impact of azithromycin MDA on trachoma in different districts;and explore the possible methods to enhance the effectiveness of azithromycin MDA in hyperendemic districts.Methods:PubMed,Embase,the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials,Web of Science,and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched up to February 2021 with no language restriction.Studies reporting the effect of azithromycin MDA on trachoma were included.Mathematical modeling studies,animal studies,case reports,and reviews were excluded.The trachomatous inflammation-follicular(TF)<5.0%was used to judge the effect of azithromycin MDA on eliminating trachoma as a public health problem.Two researchers independently conducted the selection process and risk of bias assessment.Results:A total of 1543 studies were screened,of which 67 studies including 13 cluster-randomized controlled trials and 54 non-randomized studies were included.The effect of azithromycin MDA on trachoma was closely related to the baseline prevalence in districts.For the districts with baseline prevalence between 5.0%and 9.9%,a single round of MDA achieved a TF<5.0%.For the districts with baseline between 10.0%and 29.9%,annual MDA for 3 to 5 years reduced TF<5.0%.However,for the districts with high level of baseline prevalence(TF>30.0%),especially with baseline TF>50.0%,annual MDA was unable to achieve the TF<5.0%even after 5 to 7 years of treatment.Quarterly MDA is more effective in controlling trachoma in these hyperendemic districts.Conclusions:Azithromycin MDA for controlling trachoma depends on the baseline prevalence.The recommendation by the World Health Organization that annual MDA for 3 to 5 years in the districts with TF baseline>10.0%is not appropriate for all eligible districts.展开更多
基金supported by grants from the National Science Foundation of China(Nos.81630038,81971433,81971428,81771634,and 81701499)WHO(WHO Registration 2018/859223-0)+3 种基金Deep Underground Space Medical(No.DUGM201809)Science and Technology Bureau of Sichuan Province(No.2016TD0002)the National Key R&D Program of China(No.2017YFA0104200)the Grant of clinical discipline program(Neonatology)from the Ministry of Health of China(No.1311200003303)。
文摘Backgrounds:Azithromycin mass drug administration(MDA)is a key part of the strategy for controlling trachoma.This systematic review aimed to comprehensively summarize the present studies of azithromycin MDA on trachoma;provide an overview of the impact of azithromycin MDA on trachoma in different districts;and explore the possible methods to enhance the effectiveness of azithromycin MDA in hyperendemic districts.Methods:PubMed,Embase,the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials,Web of Science,and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched up to February 2021 with no language restriction.Studies reporting the effect of azithromycin MDA on trachoma were included.Mathematical modeling studies,animal studies,case reports,and reviews were excluded.The trachomatous inflammation-follicular(TF)<5.0%was used to judge the effect of azithromycin MDA on eliminating trachoma as a public health problem.Two researchers independently conducted the selection process and risk of bias assessment.Results:A total of 1543 studies were screened,of which 67 studies including 13 cluster-randomized controlled trials and 54 non-randomized studies were included.The effect of azithromycin MDA on trachoma was closely related to the baseline prevalence in districts.For the districts with baseline prevalence between 5.0%and 9.9%,a single round of MDA achieved a TF<5.0%.For the districts with baseline between 10.0%and 29.9%,annual MDA for 3 to 5 years reduced TF<5.0%.However,for the districts with high level of baseline prevalence(TF>30.0%),especially with baseline TF>50.0%,annual MDA was unable to achieve the TF<5.0%even after 5 to 7 years of treatment.Quarterly MDA is more effective in controlling trachoma in these hyperendemic districts.Conclusions:Azithromycin MDA for controlling trachoma depends on the baseline prevalence.The recommendation by the World Health Organization that annual MDA for 3 to 5 years in the districts with TF baseline>10.0%is not appropriate for all eligible districts.
