Impacts of exercise interventions on different diseases and organ functions in mice

Background'. In recent years, much evidence has emerged to indicate that exercise can benefit people when performed properly. This reviewsummarizes the exercise interventions used in studies involving mice as they are related to special diseases or physiological status. To furtherunderstand the effects of exercise interventions in treating or preventing diseases, it is important to establish a template for exercise interventionsthat can be used in future exercise-related studies.Methods'. PubMed was used as the data resource for articles. To identify studies related to the effectiveness of exercise interventions for treatingvarious diseases and organ functions in mice, we used the following search language: (exercise [Title] OR training [Title] OR physical activity[Title]) AND (mice [title/abstract] OR mouse [title/abstract] OR mus [title/abstract]). To limit the range of search results, we included 2 filters:one that limited publication dates to "in 10 years,^ and one that sorted the results as "best match^^. Then we grouped the commonly used exercisemethods according to their similarities and differences. We then evaluated the effectiveness of the exercise interventions for their impact on diseasesand organ functions in 8 different systems.Results'. A total of 331 articles were included in the analysis procedure. The articles were then segmented into 8 systems for which the exerciseinterventions were used in targeting and treating disorders: motor system (60 studies), metabolic system (45 studies), cardio-cerebral vascularsystem (58 studies), nervous system (74 studies), immune system (32 studies), respiratory system (7 studies), digestive system (1 study), and thesystem related to the development of cancer (54 studies). The methods of exercise interventions mainly involved the use of treadmills, voluntarywheel-running, forced wheel-running, swimming, and resistance training. It was found that regardless of the specific exercise method used, mostof them demonstrated positive effects on various systemic diseases and organ functions. Most diseases were remitted with exercise regardless ofthe exercise method used, although some diseases showed the best remission effects when a specific method was used.Conclusion-. Our review strongly suggests that exercise intervention is a cornerstone in disease prevention and treatment in mice. Because exerciseinterventions in humans typically focus on chronic diseases, national fitness, and body weight loss, and typically have low intervention com・pliance rates, it is important to use mice models to investigate the molecular mechanisms underlying the health benefits from exerciseinterventions in humans.

The differential protein and lipid compositions of noncaveolar lipid microdomains and caveolae

Morphologically, caveolae and lipid rafts are two different membrane structures. They are often reported to share similar lipid and protein compositions, and are considered to be two subtypes of membrane lipid microdomains. By modifying sucrose density gradient flotation centrifugation, which is used to isolate lipid microdomains, we were able to separate caveolae and noncaveolar lipid microdomains into two distinct fractions. The caveolar membranes are membrane vesicles of 100-nm diameter, enriched with caveolin-1 and flotillin-1. The noncaveolar lipid microdomains are amorphous membranes and most likely the coalescence of heterogeneous lipid rafts. They are depleted of caveo- lin-1 and are more enriched with cholesterol and sphingolipids than the caveolae. Many membrane proteins, such as insulin-like growth factor-1 receptor （membrane receptor）, aquaporin-1 （membrane transporter）, Thy-1 and N- cadherin （glycosylphosphatidylinositol-anchored membrane protein and membrane glycoprotein）, are specifically as- sociated with noncaveolar lipid microdomains, but not with caveolae. These results indicate that the lipid and protein compositions of caveolae differ from those of noncaveolar lipid microdomains. The difference in their protein compo- sitions implies that these two membrane microdomains may have different cellular functions.

Diets,Gut Microbiota and Metabolites

The gut microbiota refers to the gross collection of microorganisms,estimated trillions of them,which reside within the gut and play crucial roles in the absorption and digestion of dietary nutrients.In the past decades,the new generation‘omics’(metagenomics,transcriptomics,proteomics,and metabolomics)technologies made it possible to precisely identify microbiota and metabolites and describe their variability between individuals,populations and even different time points within the same subjects.With massive efforts made,it is now generally accepted that the gut microbiota is a dynamically changing population,whose composition is influenced by the hosts’health conditions and lifestyles.Diet is one of the major contributors to shaping the gut microbiota.The components in the diets vary in different countries,religions,and populations.Some special diets have been adopted by people for hundreds of years aiming for better health,while the underlying mechanisms remain largely unknown.Recent studies based on volunteers or diet-treated animals demonstrated that diets can greatly and rapidly change the gut microbiota.The unique pattern of the nutrients from the diets and their metabolites produced by the gut microbiota has been linked with the occurrence of diseases,including obesity,diabetes,nonalcoholic fatty liver disease,cardiovascular disease,neural diseases,and more.This review will summarize the recent progress and current understanding of the effects of different dietary patterns on the composition of gut microbiota,bacterial metabolites,and their effects on the host's metabolism.