期刊文献+
共找到2篇文章
< 1 >
每页显示 20 50 100
CASIA 2与IOLMaster 700测量眼前段参数的比较 被引量:1
1
作者 王抒阳 步绍翀 +5 位作者 蒋元丰 秦鲁宁 王婷婷 张敏 于宗 林松 《中华眼视光学与视觉科学杂志》 CAS CSCD 2022年第11期867-872,共6页
目的:比较新型扫频源眼前节相干光层析成像仪CASIA 2与扫频源光相干生物测量仪IOLMaster 700测量眼前段结构参数的差异性和一致性。方法:回顾性研究。选取2020年4—5月在天津医科大学眼科医院就诊的白内障患者95例(95眼),分别采用CASIA ... 目的:比较新型扫频源眼前节相干光层析成像仪CASIA 2与扫频源光相干生物测量仪IOLMaster 700测量眼前段结构参数的差异性和一致性。方法:回顾性研究。选取2020年4—5月在天津医科大学眼科医院就诊的白内障患者95例(95眼),分别采用CASIA 2和IOLMaster 700测量中央角膜厚度(CCT)、前房深度(ACD)、晶状体厚度(LT)、角膜曲率陡峭轴(Ks)、角膜曲率平坦轴(Kf)。采用配对样本t检验比较2种仪器对CCT、ACD、LT、Ks、Kf测量结果的差异性;采用Pearson检验分析各参数测量结果在2种仪器间的相关性;采用Bland-Altman法评价各参数测量结果在2种仪器之间的一致性。结果:CASIA 2和IOLMaster 700测量CCT、ACD、LT差异均有统计学意义(t=-11.94,P<0.001;t=8.52,P<0.001;t=-2.97,P=0.004);测量Ks、Kf差异无统计学意义;2种仪器间测量的CCT、ACD、LT、Ks、Kf均呈正相关(r=0.99、0.99、0.99、0.98、0.97,均P<0.001)。Bland-Altman一致性分析显示,2种仪器测量CCT、ACD、LT差值的均数分别为-7.516μm、0.043 mm、0.023 mm,95%一致性界限(LoA)分别为(-19.92,4.48)μm、(-0.055,0.139)mm、(-0.120,0.160)mm。2种仪器测量Ks、Kf差值的均数为0.028 D、0.061 D,95%LoA分别为(-0.65,0.77)D、(-0.52,0.58)D;在95%LoA外分别占了7.36%(7/95)、6.31%(6/95),一致性较差。结论:CASIA 2和IOL Master 700的眼前节参数测量结果存在一定差异,且一致性欠佳。 展开更多
关键词 眼前段参数 CASIA 2 IOLMaster 700 白内障
原文传递
The impact of posterior corneal astigmatism on the surgical planning of toric multifocal intraocular lens implantation 被引量:1
2
作者 shaochong bu Yuanfeng Jiang +4 位作者 Yichen Gao Xiaomei Bai Xiteng Chen Hong Zhang Fang Tian 《Advances in Ophthalmology Practice and Research》 2023年第1期39-46,共8页
Purpose:To investigate the influence of posterior corneal astigmatism on the prediction accuracy of toric multi­focal intraocular lens(IOL)calculation.Methods:The keratometric astigmatism measured by Lenstar LS 9... Purpose:To investigate the influence of posterior corneal astigmatism on the prediction accuracy of toric multi­focal intraocular lens(IOL)calculation.Methods:The keratometric astigmatism measured by Lenstar LS 900(KCA_(L)),keratometric astigmatism(KCAp)and total corneal astigmatism(TCA)measured by Scheimpflug camera(Pentacam HR)were documented and analyzed accordingly.Three deduction models using different parameters were compared.Model 1:KCA_(L)+keratometric comeal surgically induced astigmatism(KCSIA,0.30 D@50°);Model 2:KCA_(P)+KCSIA);Model 3:TCA 4-total CSIA(TCSIA,0.23 D@50°).The prediction errors of each model as the difference vector between the actual and the intended residual astigmatism were compared.Results:Seventy-six eyes implanted with toric multifocal IOLs were included in this study.The vector differences of the actual KCSIA and TCSIA were statistically significant in the total sample and against-the-rule(ATR)sub­group(both P<0.05).Model 1 deduced the smallest mean values of prediction error,while that of Model 3 were smaller than that of Model 2,both in the total sample and the ATR subgroups(all P<0.05).Meanwhile,in the total sample and ATR subgroups,the centroid vector magnitudes of Model 3 were smaller than that of Model 1(0.31±0.76 D and 0.39±0.76 D).Conclusions:The calculation of toric multifocal IOL should be individualized especially in the ATR eyes for the impact of PCA on the estimation of the preoperative comeal astigmatism and the CSIA. 展开更多
关键词 Posterior corneal astigmatism Toric multifocal intraocular lens Corneal surgically induced astigmatism
原文传递
上一页 1 下一页 到第
使用帮助 返回顶部