Efficacy of image-enhanced endoscopy for colorectal adenoma detection:A multicenter,randomized trial

BACKGROUND Improved adenoma detection at colonoscopy has decreased the risk of developing colorectal cancer.However,whether image-enhanced endoscopy(IEE)further improves the adenoma detection rate(ADR)is controversial.AIM To compare IEE with white-light imaging(WLI)endoscopy for the detection and identification of colorectal adenoma.METHODS This was a multicenter,randomized,controlled trial.Participants were enrolled between September 2019 to April 2021 from 4 hospital in China.Patients were randomly assigned to an IEE group with WLI on entry and IEE on withdrawal(n=2113)or a WLI group with WLI on both entry and withdrawal(n=2098).The primary outcome was the ADR.The secondary endpoints were the polyp detection rate(PDR),adenomas per colonoscopy,adenomas per positive colonoscopy,and factors related to adenoma detection.RESULTS A total of 4211 patients(966 adenomas)were included in the analysis(mean age,56.7 years,47.1%male).There were 2113 patients(508 adenomas)in the IEE group and 2098 patients(458 adenomas)in the WLI group.The ADR in two group were not significantly different[24.0%vs 21.8%,1.10,95%confidence interval(CI):0.99-1.23,P=0.09].The PDR was higher with IEE group(41.7%)than with WLI group(36.1%,1.16,95%CI:1.07-1.25,P=0.01).Differences in mean withdrawal time(7.90±3.42 min vs 7.85±3.47 min,P=0.30)and adenomas per colonoscopy(0.33±0.68 vs 0.28±0.62,P=0.06)were not significant.Subgroup analysis found that with narrowband imaging(NBI),between-group differences in the ADR,were not significant(23.7%vs 21.8%,1.09,95%CI:0.97-1.22,P=0.15),but were greater with linked color imaging(30.9%vs 21.8%,1.42,95%CI:1.04-1.93,P=0.04).the second-generation NBI(2G-NBI)had an advantage of ADR than both WLI and the first-generation NBI(27.0%vs 21.8%,P=0.01;27.0%vs 21.2.0%,P=0.01).CONCLUSION This prospective study confirmed that,among Chinese,IEE didn’t increase the ADR compared with WLI,but 2G-NBI increase the ADR.

The efficacy of full-thickness endoscopic resection of subepithelial tumors in the gastric cardia

BACKGROUND Gastric subepithelial tumors(SETs)may harbor potential malignancy.Although it is well recognized that large SETs should be resected,the precise treatment strategy remains controversial.Compared to surgical resection,endoscopic resection(ER)has many advantages;however,ER of SETs in the cardia is challenging.AIM To evaluate the safety and efficacy of endoscopic full-thickness resection(EFTR)for the treatment of gastric cardia SETs.METHODS We retrospectively reviewed data from all patients with SETs originating from the muscularis propria layer in the gastric cardia that were treated by EFTR or submucosal tunneling ER(STER)at Zhongshan Hospital Fudan University between November 2014 and May 2022.Baseline characteristics and clinical outcomes,including procedure times and complications rates,were compared between groups of patients receiving EFTR and STER.RESULTS A total of 171 tumors were successfully removed[71(41.5%)tumors in the EFTR and 100(58.5%)tumors in the STER group].Gastrointestinal stromal tumors(GISTs)were the most common SET.The en bloc resection rate was 100%in the EFTR group vs 97.0%in STER group(P>0.05).Overall,the EFTR group had a higher complete resection rate than the STER group(98.6%vs 91.0%,P<0.05).The procedure time was also shorter in the EFTR group(44.63±28.66 min vs 53.36±27.34,P<0.05).The most common major complication in both groups was electrocoagulation syndrome.There was no significant difference in total complications between the two groups(21.1%vs 22.0%,P=0.89).CONCLUSION EFTR of gastric cardia SETs is a very promising method to facilitate complete resection with similar complications and reduced operative times compared to STER.In cases of suspected GISTs or an unclear diagnosis,EFTR should be recommended to ensure complete resection.

Comparative study on artificial intelligence systems for detecting early esophageal squamous cell carcinoma between narrow-band and white-light imaging

BACKGROUND Non-magnifying endoscopy with narrow-band imaging(NM-NBI)has been frequently used in routine screening of esophagus squamous cell carcinoma(ESCC).The performance of NBI for screening of early ESCC is,however,significantly affected by operator experience.Artificial intelligence may be a unique approach to compensate for the lack of operator experience.AIM To construct a computer-aided detection(CAD)system for application in NMNBI to identify early ESCC and to compare it with our previously reported CAD system with endoscopic white-light imaging(WLI).METHODS A total of 2167 abnormal NM-NBI images of early ESCC and 2568 normal images were collected from three institutions(Zhongshan Hospital of Fudan University,Xuhui Hospital,and Kiang Wu Hospital)as the training dataset,and 316 pairs of images,each pair including images obtained by WLI and NBI(same part),were collected for validation.Twenty endoscopists participated in this study to review the validation images with or without the assistance of the CAD systems.The diagnostic results of the two CAD systems and improvement in diagnostic efficacy of endoscopists were compared in terms of sensitivity,specificity,accuracy,positive predictive value,and negative predictive value.RESULTS The area under receiver operating characteristic curve for CAD-NBI was 0.9761.For the validation dataset,the sensitivity,specificity,accuracy,positive predictive value,and negative predictive value of CAD-NBI were 91.0%,96.7%,94.3%,95.3%,and 93.6%,respectively,while those of CAD-WLI were 98.5%,83.1%,89.5%,80.8%,and 98.7%,respectively.CAD-NBI showed superior accuracy and specificity than CAD-WLI(P=0.028 and P≤0.001,respectively),while CAD-WLI had higher sensitivity than CAD-NBI(P=0.006).By using both CAD-WLI and CAD-NBI,the endoscopists could improve their diagnostic efficacy to the highest level,with accuracy,sensitivity,and specificity of 94.9%,92.4%,and 96.7%,respectively.CONCLUSION The CAD-NBI system for screening early ESCC has higher accuracy and specificity than CAD-WLI.Endoscopists can achieve the best diagnostic efficacy using both CAD-WLI and CAD-NBI.

Management of iatrogenic colorectal perforation: From surgery to endoscopy

Iatrogenic colon perforation is one the most pernicious complications for patients undergoing endoscopic screening or therapy.It is a serious but rare complication of colonoscopy.However,with the expansion of the indications for endoscopic therapies for gastrointestinal diseases,the frequency of colorectal perforation has increased.The management of iatrogenic colorectal perforation is still a challenge for many endoscopists.The methods for treating this complication vary,including conservative treatment,surgical treatment,laparoscopy and endoscopy.In this review,we highlight the etiology,recognition and treatment of colorectal iatrogenic perforation.Specifically,we shed light on the endoscopic management of this rare complication.

Endoscopic resection of colorectal granular cell tumors

AIM: To determine the feasibility and effectiveness of endoscopic resection for the treatment of colorectal granular cell tumors(GCTs). METHODS: This was a retrospective study performed at a single institution. From January 2008 to April 2015, we examined a total of 11 lesions in 11 patients who were treated by an endoscopic procedure for colorectal GCTs in the Endoscopy Center, Zhongshan hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, China. Either endoscopic mucosal resection or endoscopic submucosal dissection(ESD) was performed by three surgeons with expertise in endoscopic treatment. The pre- and postoperative condition and follow-up of these patients were evaluated by colonoscopy and endoscopic ultrasonography(EUS).RESULTS: Of these 11 lesions, 2 were located in the cecum, 3 were in the ileocecal junction, 5 were in the ascending colon, and 1 was in the rectum. The median maximum diameter of the tumors was 0.81 cm(range 0.4-1.2 cm). The en bloc rate was 100%, and the complete resection rate was 90.9%(10/11). postoperative pathology in one patient showed a tumor at the cauterization margin. however, during ESD, this lesion was removed en bloc, and no tumor tissue was seen in the wound. No perforations or delayed perforations were observed and emergency surgery was not required for complications. All patients were followed up to May 2015, and none had recurrence, metastasis, or complaints of discomfort.CONCLUSION: Endoscopic treatment performed by endoscopists with sufficient experience appears to be feasible and effective for colorectal GCTs.

Ligation-assisted endoscopic submucosal resection with circumferential mucosal incision for duodenal carcinoid tumor

Here we present the case of a 64-year-old female with a duodenal carcinoid tumor treated by ligation-assisted endoscopic submucosal resection(ESMR-L) with circumferential mucosal incision(CMI). Band ligation was effective in resecting the duodenal carcinoid tumor after CMI,with an uneventful post-procedural course. Histopathological examination showed clear tumor margins at deeper tissue levels. Thus,in the present case,ESMR-L with CMI was useful for the treatment of duodenal carcinoid tumor.

Endoscopy Endoscopic resection of tumors in the lower digestive tract

As endoscopic technology has developed and matured,the endoscopic resection of gastrointestinal tract polyps has become a widely used treatment. Colorectal polyps are the most common type of polyp, which are best managed by early resection before the polyp undergoes malignant transformation. Methods for treating colorectal tumors are numerous, including argon plasma coagulation, endoscopic mucosal resection, endoscopic submucosal dissection, and laparoscopic-endoscopic cooperative surgery. In this review, we will highlight several currently used clinical endoscopic resection methods and how they are selected based on the characteristics of the targeted tumor. Specifically, we will focus on laparoscopic-endoscopic cooperative surgery.