A fixed particle number BCS （FBCS） approach is formulated in the relativistic mean field （RMF） model. It is shown that the RMF＋FBCS model obtained can describe the weak pairing limit. We calculate the ground-stat...A fixed particle number BCS （FBCS） approach is formulated in the relativistic mean field （RMF） model. It is shown that the RMF＋FBCS model obtained can describe the weak pairing limit. We calculate the ground-state properties of the calcium isotopes ＆32-74Ca and compare the results with those obtained from the usual RMF＋BCS model. Although the results are quite similar to each other, we observe the interesting phenomenon that for ^54Ca, the FBCS approach can enhance the occupation probability of the 2p1/2 single particle level and slightly increases its radius, compared with the RMF＋BCS model. This leads to the unusual scenario that although ^54Ca is more bound with a spherical configuration, the corresponding size is not the most compact. We anticipate that such a phenomenon might happen for other neutron-rich nuclei and should be checked by further more systematic studies.展开更多
基金Supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China(11522539,11735003,11775014,11375022)
文摘A fixed particle number BCS （FBCS） approach is formulated in the relativistic mean field （RMF） model. It is shown that the RMF＋FBCS model obtained can describe the weak pairing limit. We calculate the ground-state properties of the calcium isotopes ＆32-74Ca and compare the results with those obtained from the usual RMF＋BCS model. Although the results are quite similar to each other, we observe the interesting phenomenon that for ^54Ca, the FBCS approach can enhance the occupation probability of the 2p1/2 single particle level and slightly increases its radius, compared with the RMF＋BCS model. This leads to the unusual scenario that although ^54Ca is more bound with a spherical configuration, the corresponding size is not the most compact. We anticipate that such a phenomenon might happen for other neutron-rich nuclei and should be checked by further more systematic studies.
