期刊文献+
共找到2篇文章
< 1 >
每页显示 20 50 100
2型糖尿病患者直接支持和间接支持量表的研制与信效度检验 被引量:1
1
作者 张旭熙 张幸 +5 位作者 王冯斌 吴士艳 胡康 玛依努尔·于苏甫 孙昕霙 Edwin B.Fisher 《International Journal of Nursing Sciences》 CSCD 2020年第4期453-459,I0007,共8页
目的本研究旨在开发2型糖尿病患者直接支持和间接支持量表,用来测量糖尿病患者获得的直接支持和间接支持以及患者偏好,并评估该量表的信度和效度。方法本研究采用了2015年7月至9月进行的北京市通州区社区诊断项目的横断面调查数据进行分... 目的本研究旨在开发2型糖尿病患者直接支持和间接支持量表,用来测量糖尿病患者获得的直接支持和间接支持以及患者偏好,并评估该量表的信度和效度。方法本研究采用了2015年7月至9月进行的北京市通州区社区诊断项目的横断面调查数据进行分析,共纳入474例2型糖尿病患者。根据已有研究结果和专家建议,设计了关于从家人和朋友那里获得的直接支持和间接支持、包含11个条目的原始量表。原始量表中,5个条目(第1~5条)为间接支持,6个条目(第6~11条)为直接支持。每个条目有两个平行问题,一个用于衡量对支持的偏好(“偏好”部分),另一个用于衡量现实中获得的支持(“现实”部分)。应用探索性因子分析评估原始11条目量表的结构效度并确定最终版量表。应用验证性因子分析评估最终版量表的结构效度。使用Cronbach'sα系数评估量表的内部一致性,进而用于评估最终版量表的信度。结果通过探索性因子分析确定最终版7条目量表,共2个因子,4个条目为间接支持,3个条目为直接支持。验证性因子分析显示7条目量表模型拟合良好,结构效度较好。7条目量表以及间接支持部分条目的内部一致性良好,Cronbach'sα系数≥7.0。结论本研究显示7条目的2型糖尿病患者直接支持和间接支持量表具有较好的信度和效度。未来需要对该量表在不同环境和人群中的应用做进一步研究。 展开更多
关键词 糖尿病 直接支持 间接支持 患者意愿 自我护理 社会支持
下载PDF
Development and evaluation of the health belief model scale for exercise 被引量:1
2
作者 shiyan wu Xinglin Feng Xinying Sun 《International Journal of Nursing Sciences》 CSCD 2020年第S01期23-30,共8页
Objectives:This study was aimed to develop a health belief model scale for exercise among Chinese residents to describe the relationships between health beliefs and exercise for promoting residents to adopt or maintai... Objectives:This study was aimed to develop a health belief model scale for exercise among Chinese residents to describe the relationships between health beliefs and exercise for promoting residents to adopt or maintain exercise programs.Methods:Participants were from two projects,Project 1 with 3833 participants and Project 2 with 7319 participants.A pool of 21 items was developed based on a small-scale qualitative study about health beliefs of exercise and literature.Internal consistency and construct validity of the scale were evaluated with Cronbach'sαcoefficient,exploratory factor analysis(EFA),confirmatory factor analysis(CFA)and second-order confirmatory factor analysis.Results:A final version of 18 items loaded on six factors which could explain 60.30-%of variance was observed after EFA.The internal consistency of the final version with 18 items performed in Project 1 was acceptable(0.609).The reliability of the six subscales was good with Cronbach'sαcoefficient of 0.628,0.713,0.628,0.801,0.676 and 0.838 for perceived benefits,perceived objective barriers,perceived subjective barriers,self-efficacy,perceived severity and cues to action,respectively.CFA and second-order CFA indicated a good fit to data.Conclusions:The Health Belief Model Scale for Exercise(HBMS-E)is a valid and reliable instrument to assess health beliefs of exercise among residents in China.Understanding the health beliefs of exercise will help health professionals to develop effective interventions for health and evaluate the effectiveness. 展开更多
关键词 EXERCISE EVALUATION Health belief model Physical activity SCALE
下载PDF
上一页 1 下一页 到第
使用帮助 返回顶部